The Democrat Party Just Slit Their Own Wrist

[bendog]

The Phrump supporters to someone to blame for the violence that Donald continue to encourage at his. so called, rallies.

Have you ever really listened to him? All he does is talk about building a wall, blocking Muslim's, deporting illegals and, oh year. HOW GREAT, AND RICH AND MARVELOUS THAT HE IS!

"I have the greatest plans!" No one has actually seen or heard them, but they are great....?

The ones who support him have actually looked into his plans at his website and have read his book.

i've read his book. he's bankrupted four corporations and hung his investors out to dry.

and you were saying?

i suppose people who aren't very bright buy into his garbage. it's why he loves the uneducated.

And what did your dear leader do to the GM and Chrysler investors and vendors? Come on jillie, pull your head out of maobamas ass for a change and be honest.

Obama is running for the Third Term?

If the Donald is the gop nominee, Obama'd win.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The Phrump supporters to someone to blame for the violence that Donald continue to encourage at his. so called, rallies.

Have you ever really listened to him? All he does is talk about building a wall, blocking Muslim's, deporting illegals and, oh year. HOW GREAT, AND RICH AND MARVELOUS THAT HE IS!

"I have the greatest plans!" No one has actually seen or heard them, but they are great....?

The ones who support him have actually looked into his plans at his website and have read his book.

i've read his book. he's bankrupted four corporations and hung his investors out to dry.

and you were saying?

i suppose people who aren't very bright buy into his garbage. it's why he loves the uneducated.

And what did your dear leader do to the GM and Chrysler investors and vendors? Come on jillie, pull your head out of maobamas ass for a change and be honest.

Obama is running for the Third Term?

If the Donald is the gop nominee, Obama'd win.

Which proves yet again that yo do not grasp what is happening.

 

[OKTexas]

The Phrump supporters to someone to blame for the violence that Donald continue to encourage at his. so called, rallies.

Have you ever really listened to him? All he does is talk about building a wall, blocking Muslim's, deporting illegals and, oh year. HOW GREAT, AND RICH AND MARVELOUS THAT HE IS!

"I have the greatest plans!" No one has actually seen or heard them, but they are great....?

The ones who support him have actually looked into his plans at his website and have read his book.

i've read his book. he's bankrupted four corporations and hung his investors out to dry.

and you were saying?

i suppose people who aren't very bright buy into his garbage. it's why he loves the uneducated.

And what did your dear leader do to the GM and Chrysler investors and vendors? Come on jillie, pull your head out of maobamas ass for a change and be honest.

Obama is running for the Third Term?

Nope, just pointing out similarities between people jillie loves and hates, she doesn't have an intellectually honest bone in her flabby body.

 

[JimH52]

The hildabitch isn't talking about free college, oh ignorant one. Trump hasn't said anything racist, of course you can't say the same for the hildabitch and her esteemed rapist husband. You freaking hypocrites say nothing about that.

Yes, you keep saying that, but those non-white people- you know, the ones rioting outside his rallies, see it differently.

have ya notice the name calling these right wing nut jobs start when they see they are losing the debate here ...

To the libtards we will be 'losing the debate' when we have, in 2017, control of Congress, SCOTUS and the White House.

I like me some of that kind of losing, lolol.

And that is why the GOP Brass are running for the hills and predicting gloom and doom if Phrump wins the nomination. GOP Senators in blue states are shaking in their boots.

AND I LOVE IT!

 

[JimBowie1958]

The hildabitch isn't talking about free college, oh ignorant one. Trump hasn't said anything racist, of course you can't say the same for the hildabitch and her esteemed rapist husband. You freaking hypocrites say nothing about that.

Yes, you keep saying that, but those non-white people- you know, the ones rioting outside his rallies, see it differently.

have ya notice the name calling these right wing nut jobs start when they see they are losing the debate here ...

To the libtards we will be 'losing the debate' when we have, in 2017, control of Congress, SCOTUS and the White House.

I like me some of that kind of losing, lolol.

And that is why the GOP Brass are running for the hills and predicting gloom and doom if Phrump wins the nomination. GOP Senators in blue states are shaking in their boots.

AND I LOVE IT!

Lol, no, that is not why they are 'shaking in their boots'.

They quiver at the prospect of a champion of the American people taking over in DC next year, dolt.

 

[Papageorgio]

The Phrump supporters to someone to blame for the violence that Donald continue to encourage at his. so called, rallies.

Have you ever really listened to him? All he does is talk about building a wall, blocking Muslim's, deporting illegals and, oh year. HOW GREAT, AND RICH AND MARVELOUS THAT HE IS!

"I have the greatest plans!" No one has actually seen or heard them, but they are great....?

The ones who support him have actually looked into his plans at his website and have read his book.

i've read his book. he's bankrupted four corporations and hung his investors out to dry.

and you were saying?

i suppose people who aren't very bright buy into his garbage. it's why he loves the uneducated.

And what did your dear leader do to the GM and Chrysler investors and vendors? Come on jillie, pull your head out of maobamas ass for a change and be honest.

Obama is running for the Third Term?

No, but Obama ruined two companies and hung investors out to dry and he was re-elected, so obviously this is not a reason not to vote for Trump. I can't figure if you play dumb or really are, hard to believe someone is as stupid as you are making yourself out to be.

 

[JimH52]

Demographics say Phrump CANNOT win the General, against anyone! But you keep dreaming your warped dream.

 

[JimBowie1958]

 

[bendog]

The ones who support him have actually looked into his plans at his website and have read his book.

i've read his book. he's bankrupted four corporations and hung his investors out to dry.

and you were saying?

i suppose people who aren't very bright buy into his garbage. it's why he loves the uneducated.

And what did your dear leader do to the GM and Chrysler investors and vendors? Come on jillie, pull your head out of maobamas ass for a change and be honest.

Obama is running for the Third Term?

If the Donald is the gop nominee, Obama'd win.

Which proves yet again that yo do not grasp what is happening.

Trump's negatives are toppin 60%.

Demographics say Phrump CANNOT win the General, against anyone! But you keep dreaming your warped dream.

That's true, but Hillary still has to convince general election voters there's some reason to vote for her. It's going to be pretty easy to convince 55% or maybe even more of the electorate who generally bother to vote not to vote for Trump. But, possibly some who don't normally bother showing up will show up for Trump. So, if we have an historically low turnout, I don't think we can discount the possibility of Trump winning. It's not likely, but it's possible.

 

[Papageorgio]

i've read his book. he's bankrupted four corporations and hung his investors out to dry.

and you were saying?

i suppose people who aren't very bright buy into his garbage. it's why he loves the uneducated.

And what did your dear leader do to the GM and Chrysler investors and vendors? Come on jillie, pull your head out of maobamas ass for a change and be honest.

Obama is running for the Third Term?

If the Donald is the gop nominee, Obama'd win.

Which proves yet again that yo do not grasp what is happening.

Trump's negatives are toppin 60%.

Demographics say Phrump CANNOT win the General, against anyone! But you keep dreaming your warped dream.

That's true, but Hillary still has to convince general election voters there's some reason to vote for her. It's going to be pretty easy to convince 55% or maybe even more of the electorate who generally bother to vote not to vote for Trump. But, possibly some who don't normally bother showing up will show up for Trump. So, if we have an historically low turnout, I don't think we can discount the possibility of Trump winning. It's not likely, but it's possible.

Do you think Clinton can inspire voters to go to the polls and vote for her? The primaries are indicating low turnout for the Democratic Party. This has to be a concern for her and the party.

 

[bendog]

And what did your dear leader do to the GM and Chrysler investors and vendors? Come on jillie, pull your head out of maobamas ass for a change and be honest.

Obama is running for the Third Term?

If the Donald is the gop nominee, Obama'd win.

Which proves yet again that yo do not grasp what is happening.

Trump's negatives are toppin 60%.

Demographics say Phrump CANNOT win the General, against anyone! But you keep dreaming your warped dream.

That's true, but Hillary still has to convince general election voters there's some reason to vote for her. It's going to be pretty easy to convince 55% or maybe even more of the electorate who generally bother to vote not to vote for Trump. But, possibly some who don't normally bother showing up will show up for Trump. So, if we have an historically low turnout, I don't think we can discount the possibility of Trump winning. It's not likely, but it's possible.

Do you think Clinton can inspire voters to go to the polls and vote for her? The primaries are indicating low turnout for the Democratic Party. This has to be a concern for her and the party.

Turnout's actually been high for the dems, but I think that's because Bernie is sort of having the same effect as Trump on the GOP, though fortunately not with the incivility and violence.

So far, turnout in this year’s primaries rivals 2008 record

But yeah I think that's the question. IF it's Donald v. Hillary it would seem the eventual winner will be whomever gets the vote out. The dems historically have the better ground game because of blacks and they've invested in building vote drive machines with latinos. Reed got out the vote in Nev and that doomed Bernie's chances. Older women will turn out for Hillary, but aside from them, Hillary has no real constituency and is dependent on the party and negative views of the gop.

I suspect Hillary will have to have Bernie on the ticket

 

[Papageorgio]

Obama is running for the Third Term?

If the Donald is the gop nominee, Obama'd win.

Which proves yet again that yo do not grasp what is happening.

Trump's negatives are toppin 60%.

Demographics say Phrump CANNOT win the General, against anyone! But you keep dreaming your warped dream.

That's true, but Hillary still has to convince general election voters there's some reason to vote for her. It's going to be pretty easy to convince 55% or maybe even more of the electorate who generally bother to vote not to vote for Trump. But, possibly some who don't normally bother showing up will show up for Trump. So, if we have an historically low turnout, I don't think we can discount the possibility of Trump winning. It's not likely, but it's possible.

Do you think Clinton can inspire voters to go to the polls and vote for her? The primaries are indicating low turnout for the Democratic Party. This has to be a concern for her and the party.

Turnout's actually been high for the dems, but I think that's because Bernie is sort of having the same effect as Trump on the GOP, though fortunately not with the incivility and violence.

So far, turnout in this year’s primaries rivals 2008 record

But yeah I think that's the question. IF it's Donald v. Hillary it would seem the eventual winner will be whomever gets the vote out. The dems historically have the better ground game because of blacks and they've invested in building vote drive machines with latinos. Reed got out the vote in Nev and that doomed Bernie's chances. Older women will turn out for Hillary, but aside from them, Hillary has no real constituency and is dependent on the party and negative views of the gop.

I suspect Hillary will have to have Bernie on the ticket

Democratic turnout is less than Republican turnout.

 

[bendog]

If the Donald is the gop nominee, Obama'd win.

Which proves yet again that yo do not grasp what is happening.

Trump's negatives are toppin 60%.

Demographics say Phrump CANNOT win the General, against anyone! But you keep dreaming your warped dream.

That's true, but Hillary still has to convince general election voters there's some reason to vote for her. It's going to be pretty easy to convince 55% or maybe even more of the electorate who generally bother to vote not to vote for Trump. But, possibly some who don't normally bother showing up will show up for Trump. So, if we have an historically low turnout, I don't think we can discount the possibility of Trump winning. It's not likely, but it's possible.

Do you think Clinton can inspire voters to go to the polls and vote for her? The primaries are indicating low turnout for the Democratic Party. This has to be a concern for her and the party.

Turnout's actually been high for the dems, but I think that's because Bernie is sort of having the same effect as Trump on the GOP, though fortunately not with the incivility and violence.

So far, turnout in this year’s primaries rivals 2008 record

But yeah I think that's the question. IF it's Donald v. Hillary it would seem the eventual winner will be whomever gets the vote out. The dems historically have the better ground game because of blacks and they've invested in building vote drive machines with latinos. Reed got out the vote in Nev and that doomed Bernie's chances. Older women will turn out for Hillary, but aside from them, Hillary has no real constituency and is dependent on the party and negative views of the gop.

I suspect Hillary will have to have Bernie on the ticket

Democratic turnout is less than Republican turnout.

Yes. But dem turnout is still higher than it has been, except for the novelty of Obama. It's not like the dems aren't voting. But I suspect the turnout is largely because of Bernie. There are similarities and dissimilarities in the primaries. The people who are voting for Bernie share the same ideology of those who voted for Obama 8 years ago. But the people who want "four more years" of Obama are voting for Hillary. The people who feel Obama let them down and "is a republican" are voting for Bernie. Hillary's challenge is to get them without seeming a socialist. They seem mad because Obama turned out NOT to be a muslim Kenyan socialist Marxist. LOL

The Donald's turnout is a little bit similar. He's getting people who feel betrayed by the gop establishment. I too voted against the establishment candidates, because I'm sick of supply side tax cuts that do nothing but fuel deficits and make the very wealthy very very very wealthy. But I don't see the Donald's path to unifying the gop.

 

[Papageorgio]

Which proves yet again that yo do not grasp what is happening.

Trump's negatives are toppin 60%.

Demographics say Phrump CANNOT win the General, against anyone! But you keep dreaming your warped dream.

That's true, but Hillary still has to convince general election voters there's some reason to vote for her. It's going to be pretty easy to convince 55% or maybe even more of the electorate who generally bother to vote not to vote for Trump. But, possibly some who don't normally bother showing up will show up for Trump. So, if we have an historically low turnout, I don't think we can discount the possibility of Trump winning. It's not likely, but it's possible.

Do you think Clinton can inspire voters to go to the polls and vote for her? The primaries are indicating low turnout for the Democratic Party. This has to be a concern for her and the party.

Turnout's actually been high for the dems, but I think that's because Bernie is sort of having the same effect as Trump on the GOP, though fortunately not with the incivility and violence.

So far, turnout in this year’s primaries rivals 2008 record

But yeah I think that's the question. IF it's Donald v. Hillary it would seem the eventual winner will be whomever gets the vote out. The dems historically have the better ground game because of blacks and they've invested in building vote drive machines with latinos. Reed got out the vote in Nev and that doomed Bernie's chances. Older women will turn out for Hillary, but aside from them, Hillary has no real constituency and is dependent on the party and negative views of the gop.

I suspect Hillary will have to have Bernie on the ticket

Democratic turnout is less than Republican turnout.

Yes. But dem turnout is still higher than it has been, except for the novelty of Obama. It's not like the dems aren't voting. But I suspect the turnout is largely because of Bernie. There are similarities and dissimilarities in the primaries. The people who are voting for Bernie share the same ideology of those who voted for Obama 8 years ago. But the people who want "four more years" of Obama are voting for Hillary. The people who feel Obama let them down and "is a republican" are voting for Bernie. Hillary's challenge is to get them without seeming a socialist. They seem mad because Obama turned out NOT to be a muslim Kenyan socialist Marxist. LOL

The Donald's turnout is a little bit similar. He's getting people who feel betrayed by the gop establishment. I too voted against the establishment candidates, because I'm sick of supply side tax cuts that do nothing but fuel deficits and make the very wealthy very very very wealthy. But I don't see the Donald's path to unifying the gop.

Interesting theory. Trump is not a unifier, however neither is Clinton.

We have two very bad candidates.

 

[JimH52]

Trump's negatives are toppin 60%.
That's true, but Hillary still has to convince general election voters there's some reason to vote for her. It's going to be pretty easy to convince 55% or maybe even more of the electorate who generally bother to vote not to vote for Trump. But, possibly some who don't normally bother showing up will show up for Trump. So, if we have an historically low turnout, I don't think we can discount the possibility of Trump winning. It's not likely, but it's possible.

Do you think Clinton can inspire voters to go to the polls and vote for her? The primaries are indicating low turnout for the Democratic Party. This has to be a concern for her and the party.

Turnout's actually been high for the dems, but I think that's because Bernie is sort of having the same effect as Trump on the GOP, though fortunately not with the incivility and violence.

So far, turnout in this year’s primaries rivals 2008 record

But yeah I think that's the question. IF it's Donald v. Hillary it would seem the eventual winner will be whomever gets the vote out. The dems historically have the better ground game because of blacks and they've invested in building vote drive machines with latinos. Reed got out the vote in Nev and that doomed Bernie's chances. Older women will turn out for Hillary, but aside from them, Hillary has no real constituency and is dependent on the party and negative views of the gop.

I suspect Hillary will have to have Bernie on the ticket

Democratic turnout is less than Republican turnout.

Yes. But dem turnout is still higher than it has been, except for the novelty of Obama. It's not like the dems aren't voting. But I suspect the turnout is largely because of Bernie. There are similarities and dissimilarities in the primaries. The people who are voting for Bernie share the same ideology of those who voted for Obama 8 years ago. But the people who want "four more years" of Obama are voting for Hillary. The people who feel Obama let them down and "is a republican" are voting for Bernie. Hillary's challenge is to get them without seeming a socialist. They seem mad because Obama turned out NOT to be a muslim Kenyan socialist Marxist. LOL

The Donald's turnout is a little bit similar. He's getting people who feel betrayed by the gop establishment. I too voted against the establishment candidates, because I'm sick of supply side tax cuts that do nothing but fuel deficits and make the very wealthy very very very wealthy. But I don't see the Donald's path to unifying the gop.

Interesting theory. Trump is not a unifier, however neither is Clinton.

We have two very bad candidates.

Had Biden decided to run....?

 

[hazlnut]

What happened in Chicago is the equivalent of the Dems slitting a wrist, now it up to the leadership to determine if they're going to slit the other one and bleed out, or remedy the situation. The vast majority of the regressives on this board are crowing about shutting down an opposition rally, well get ready for the boomerang effect. If it happens again, you will see independents and moderate dims leaving the party in droves. The majority of Americans won't view this kind of behavior positively, the way the far left loons do. So you find yourselves at a cross roads, which path will you chose? Take the wrong one and you WILL lose this election and all the down ballot races as well. Please, feel free to keep it up.

That was a set up you idiot.

Everybody sees it.

Trump held a rally in the center of a diverse city on the campus of a diverse university. HE HAD NO INTENTION OF EVER COMING.

1) HE GOT ALL HIS FOLLOWERS (SHEEP) IN THE BUILDING

2) ALONG WITH PROTESTERS FROM CHICAGO--A CITY WITH PRE-EXISTING RACIAL TENSION BECAUSE OF POLICE SHOOTINGS AND COVER-UPS

3) ALL THIS JUST TWO DAYS AFTER STORY BREAKS OF BLACK MAN GETTING SUCKER PUNCHED AT ANOTHER RALLY.

4) THE CHICAGO POLICE NEVER TOLD HIM TO CALL IT OFF.

5) TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CREATE A HOSTILE ATMOSPHERE WHERE SHIT WOULD GO DOWN AND BLAME IT ON THE DEMS.

6) HE WAS NEVER GOING TO SHOW. IT WAS A SETUP. DUH!


You'd have to be complete idiot not to see it.

 

[JimH52]

What happened in Chicago is the equivalent of the Dems slitting a wrist, now it up to the leadership to determine if they're going to slit the other one and bleed out, or remedy the situation. The vast majority of the regressives on this board are crowing about shutting down an opposition rally, well get ready for the boomerang effect. If it happens again, you will see independents and moderate dims leaving the party in droves. The majority of Americans won't view this kind of behavior positively, the way the far left loons do. So you find yourselves at a cross roads, which path will you chose? Take the wrong one and you WILL lose this election and all the down ballot races as well. Please, feel free to keep it up.

That was a set up you idiot.

Everybody sees it.

Trump held a rally in the center of a diverse city on the campus of a diverse university. HE HAD NO INTENTION OF EVER COMING.

1) HE GOT ALL HIS FOLLOWERS (SHEEP) IN THE BUILDING

2) ALONG WITH PROTESTERS FROM CHICAGO--A CITY WITH PRE-EXISTING RACIAL TENSION BECAUSE OF POLICE SHOOTINGS AND COVER-UPS

3) ALL THIS JUST TWO DAYS AFTER STORY BREAKS OF BLACK MAN GETTING SUCKER PUNCHED AT ANOTHER RALLY.

4) THE CHICAGO POLICE NEVER TOLD HIM TO CALL IT OFF.

5) TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CREATE A HOSTILE ATMOSPHERE WHERE SHIT WOULD GO DOWN AND BLAME IT ON THE DEMS.

6) HE WAS NEVER GOING TO SHOW. IT WAS A SETUP. DUH!


You'd have to be complete idiot not to see it.

Love your signature photo. Bullies would not be so bad without a mouth.

 

[Papageorgio]

Do you think Clinton can inspire voters to go to the polls and vote for her? The primaries are indicating low turnout for the Democratic Party. This has to be a concern for her and the party.

Turnout's actually been high for the dems, but I think that's because Bernie is sort of having the same effect as Trump on the GOP, though fortunately not with the incivility and violence.

So far, turnout in this year’s primaries rivals 2008 record

But yeah I think that's the question. IF it's Donald v. Hillary it would seem the eventual winner will be whomever gets the vote out. The dems historically have the better ground game because of blacks and they've invested in building vote drive machines with latinos. Reed got out the vote in Nev and that doomed Bernie's chances. Older women will turn out for Hillary, but aside from them, Hillary has no real constituency and is dependent on the party and negative views of the gop.

I suspect Hillary will have to have Bernie on the ticket

Democratic turnout is less than Republican turnout.

Yes. But dem turnout is still higher than it has been, except for the novelty of Obama. It's not like the dems aren't voting. But I suspect the turnout is largely because of Bernie. There are similarities and dissimilarities in the primaries. The people who are voting for Bernie share the same ideology of those who voted for Obama 8 years ago. But the people who want "four more years" of Obama are voting for Hillary. The people who feel Obama let them down and "is a republican" are voting for Bernie. Hillary's challenge is to get them without seeming a socialist. They seem mad because Obama turned out NOT to be a muslim Kenyan socialist Marxist. LOL

The Donald's turnout is a little bit similar. He's getting people who feel betrayed by the gop establishment. I too voted against the establishment candidates, because I'm sick of supply side tax cuts that do nothing but fuel deficits and make the very wealthy very very very wealthy. But I don't see the Donald's path to unifying the gop.

Interesting theory. Trump is not a unifier, however neither is Clinton.

We have two very bad candidates.

Had Biden decided to run....?

If you can't vote for a liar, a divider or a person of low character, I can't see you voting for either Clinton or Trump. These are the worst two candidates in my life time.

 

[Papageorgio]

What happened in Chicago is the equivalent of the Dems slitting a wrist, now it up to the leadership to determine if they're going to slit the other one and bleed out, or remedy the situation. The vast majority of the regressives on this board are crowing about shutting down an opposition rally, well get ready for the boomerang effect. If it happens again, you will see independents and moderate dims leaving the party in droves. The majority of Americans won't view this kind of behavior positively, the way the far left loons do. So you find yourselves at a cross roads, which path will you chose? Take the wrong one and you WILL lose this election and all the down ballot races as well. Please, feel free to keep it up.

That was a set up you idiot.

Everybody sees it.

Trump held a rally in the center of a diverse city on the campus of a diverse university. HE HAD NO INTENTION OF EVER COMING.

1) HE GOT ALL HIS FOLLOWERS (SHEEP) IN THE BUILDING

2) ALONG WITH PROTESTERS FROM CHICAGO--A CITY WITH PRE-EXISTING RACIAL TENSION BECAUSE OF POLICE SHOOTINGS AND COVER-UPS

3) ALL THIS JUST TWO DAYS AFTER STORY BREAKS OF BLACK MAN GETTING SUCKER PUNCHED AT ANOTHER RALLY.

4) THE CHICAGO POLICE NEVER TOLD HIM TO CALL IT OFF.

5) TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CREATE A HOSTILE ATMOSPHERE WHERE SHIT WOULD GO DOWN AND BLAME IT ON THE DEMS.

6) HE WAS NEVER GOING TO SHOW. IT WAS A SETUP. DUH!


You'd have to be complete idiot not to see it.

You are a complete idiot to believe stupid poorly thought conspiracies, such as the one you posted.

 

[JimBowie1958]

What happened in Chicago is the equivalent of the Dems slitting a wrist, now it up to the leadership to determine if they're going to slit the other one and bleed out, or remedy the situation. The vast majority of the regressives on this board are crowing about shutting down an opposition rally, well get ready for the boomerang effect. If it happens again, you will see independents and moderate dims leaving the party in droves. The majority of Americans won't view this kind of behavior positively, the way the far left loons do. So you find yourselves at a cross roads, which path will you chose? Take the wrong one and you WILL lose this election and all the down ballot races as well. Please, feel free to keep it up.

That was a set up you idiot.

Everybody sees it.

Trump held a rally in the center of a diverse city on the campus of a diverse university. HE HAD NO INTENTION OF EVER COMING.

1) HE GOT ALL HIS FOLLOWERS (SHEEP) IN THE BUILDING

2) ALONG WITH PROTESTERS FROM CHICAGO--A CITY WITH PRE-EXISTING RACIAL TENSION BECAUSE OF POLICE SHOOTINGS AND COVER-UPS

3) ALL THIS JUST TWO DAYS AFTER STORY BREAKS OF BLACK MAN GETTING SUCKER PUNCHED AT ANOTHER RALLY.

4) THE CHICAGO POLICE NEVER TOLD HIM TO CALL IT OFF.

5) TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CREATE A HOSTILE ATMOSPHERE WHERE SHIT WOULD GO DOWN AND BLAME IT ON THE DEMS.

6) HE WAS NEVER GOING TO SHOW. IT WAS A SETUP. DUH!


You'd have to be complete idiot not to see it.

Lol, yeah, that mean ole Vast Right Wing Conspiracy did it.

roflmao