The democrat press doesn't want to hide anymore, they just want to work for Hilary...

Hilary has actually done things that have gotten real people killed.........Bh Nyasia, now her emails outed an Iranian scientist........,,,

Ooooh trump said something rude.....Hilary got people killed.......

Sadly every S of State has had events come up that have resulted in deaths. I know of no circumstance where she has murdered anyone save the conspiracy theories. She does have flaws, no doubt but to say she gets people killed is over the top.


Wrong...she was in charge of the safety of ambassador Stevens in Libya......she refused to increase security and was part of the group that did not send help.....now...her email server got an Iranian scientist hanged in Iran.......

Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?
 
Sadly every S of State has had events come up that have resulted in deaths. I know of no circumstance where she has murdered anyone save the conspiracy theories. She does have flaws, no doubt but to say she gets people killed is over the top.


Wrong...she was in charge of the safety of ambassador Stevens in Libya......she refused to increase security and was part of the group that did not send help.....now...her email server got an Iranian scientist hanged in Iran.......

Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.
 
Wrong...she was in charge of the safety of ambassador Stevens in Libya......she refused to increase security and was part of the group that did not send help.....now...her email server got an Iranian scientist hanged in Iran.......

Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.

It seems odd she could convince Obama to run weapons to multiple terrorist groups, bomb and overthrow countries, but couldn't convince him to save his own ambassador. That really doesn't make much sense to me. The team defending the Ambassador had laser equipment used to guide precision munitions. Everyone knew it was terrorist attack. To do nothing seems very odd.
 
Wrong...she was in charge of the safety of ambassador Stevens in Libya......she refused to increase security and was part of the group that did not send help.....now...her email server got an Iranian scientist hanged in Iran.......

Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.
Bill & Hillary did the same thing in Somalia in 93'.

They think they can get by looking harmless. Demilitarizing the military. You'd think they'd learned their lesson when Bill was president, but no. They don't give a shit as long as it's not their asses at risk.
 
There is a column in the New York Times ...the guy admits that they want to openly act against Donald Trump.....

Of course we know they are actively attacking Trump and hiding Hilary.......now...they don't want to have to pretend anymore...they want to be open and proud about it.....


Imagine if the Republican didn't have to face the coordinated efforts of Hollywood, the press and the federal bureacracy.........the democrat couldn't win.....

They should do whatever they can to shit out trump by any means possible.
 
The biased MSM hacks can do whatever they want, just stop pretending to be objective journalists because that's one big fat lie.
 
Wrong...she was in charge of the safety of ambassador Stevens in Libya......she refused to increase security and was part of the group that did not send help.....now...her email server got an Iranian scientist hanged in Iran.......

Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.


She put then in Libya without enough security and despite experts telling her they needed a hell of a lot more security on the ground.........and then, when they were under attack...she didn't lead the voices yelling to send in the cavalry.......they were her people...she put them there......
 
Wrong...she was in charge of the safety of ambassador Stevens in Libya......she refused to increase security and was part of the group that did not send help.....now...her email server got an Iranian scientist hanged in Iran.......

Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.


They were told those people were going to die by a security expert who reported to the State Department 9 months before the attack...


What We Do Know about the Benghazi Attack Demands a Reckoning

the State Department dispatched a security officer to assess the threat there.

In an interview with the House Select Committee on Benghazi, the officer recounted his report to a superior at State, then under the direction of Secretary Hillary Clinton:

I told him that this was a suicide mission; that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die; that there was absolutely no ability here to prevent an attack whatever. . . . He said, “Everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi and nobody is going to care until somebody does die.”
 
Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.

It seems odd she could convince Obama to run weapons to multiple terrorist groups, bomb and overthrow countries, but couldn't convince him to save his own ambassador. That really doesn't make much sense to me. The team defending the Ambassador had laser equipment used to guide precision munitions. Everyone knew it was terrorist attack. To do nothing seems very odd.

Yes it does seem odd but I would still look to the president and not the sec for answers.
 
Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.


She put then in Libya without enough security and despite experts telling her they needed a hell of a lot more security on the ground.........and then, when they were under attack...she didn't lead the voices yelling to send in the cavalry.......they were her people...she put them there......

It is my understanding that Stevens put himself in Benghazi. He could have stayed in the embassy during that dangerous time.
 
Sorry. I don't buy into those ideas. Things like Benghazi have happened dozens of times in my lifetime. The stupid Iranian committed suicide by returning to Iran.

I understand the mistrust of Hillary. I feel the same. I just will not attempt to exaggerate situations that were out of her hands. Hey! I get it. She is owned by the corps and beholding to the foreign donors to her charity. Her handling of emails was clumbsy but no worse than Bush's people.

I will not vote for her but on the same hand I will not help spread lies against her either.
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.


They were told those people were going to die by a security expert who reported to the State Department 9 months before the attack...


What We Do Know about the Benghazi Attack Demands a Reckoning

the State Department dispatched a security officer to assess the threat there.

In an interview with the House Select Committee on Benghazi, the officer recounted his report to a superior at State, then under the direction of Secretary Hillary Clinton:

I told him that this was a suicide mission; that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die; that there was absolutely no ability here to prevent an attack whatever. . . . He said, “Everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi and nobody is going to care until somebody does die.”

Then why did that dummy, Stevens, head out to Benghazi? It was bad judgement to separate himself from any immediate backup. I saw NOTHING that said Clinton ordered Stevens to go on that risky gambit.
 
Regarding Benghazi, why didn't she used the same war planes (that were an hour away) that she used to overthrow Gaddafi?

The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.


They were told those people were going to die by a security expert who reported to the State Department 9 months before the attack...


What We Do Know about the Benghazi Attack Demands a Reckoning

the State Department dispatched a security officer to assess the threat there.

In an interview with the House Select Committee on Benghazi, the officer recounted his report to a superior at State, then under the direction of Secretary Hillary Clinton:

I told him that this was a suicide mission; that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die; that there was absolutely no ability here to prevent an attack whatever. . . . He said, “Everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi and nobody is going to care until somebody does die.”

Then why did that dummy, Stevens, head out to Benghazi? It was bad judgement to separate himself from any immediate backup. I saw NOTHING that said Clinton ordered Stevens to go on that risky gambit.

Stevens was a dedicated man.......and trusted the system....that system was always that if you get in trouble.....your boss has your back...the cavalry will be sent.....and like many...he trusted Clinton.......and sadly, she let him die...
 
I love to hear these pre-emptive excuses to why Trump is losing.

Its never the fault of their candidate or their ideals. Its always someone elses fault.

That is...until they lose then the same bunch will claim he was conservative enough lol
as long as the news media is against trump, that's reason enough to vote for him.
 
The sec of state is not the president or a general in the field. She had no authority to order any kind of military action. You people are misplacing your anger at the wrong individual.

It was her personnel involved and she met with Obama. So are you saying Obama is the one that refused to help?

Well, that seems to be the case. He would need to send any military assistance. An emergency conference would need to be assembled and then reliable intel would have to be assessed. The president or a general somewhere would have to make the call. Blaming Hillary is silly. She was just one of several pieces of the input to those with the ability to act.


They were told those people were going to die by a security expert who reported to the State Department 9 months before the attack...


What We Do Know about the Benghazi Attack Demands a Reckoning

the State Department dispatched a security officer to assess the threat there.

In an interview with the House Select Committee on Benghazi, the officer recounted his report to a superior at State, then under the direction of Secretary Hillary Clinton:

I told him that this was a suicide mission; that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die; that there was absolutely no ability here to prevent an attack whatever. . . . He said, “Everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi and nobody is going to care until somebody does die.”

Then why did that dummy, Stevens, head out to Benghazi? It was bad judgement to separate himself from any immediate backup. I saw NOTHING that said Clinton ordered Stevens to go on that risky gambit.

Stevens was a dedicated man.......and trusted the system....that system was always that if you get in trouble.....your boss has your back...the cavalry will be sent.....and like many...he trusted Clinton.......and sadly, she let him die...

The sec doesn't order the use of military. Why is it that you people cannot understand that basic fact?
 

Forum List

Back
Top