The DNC did the right thing by opposing Sanders

"Sanders Supporters Protest: ‘Hell No, DNC, We Won’t Vote for Hillary’"





:lol:
 
so what's the big deal the DNC preferred hillary...? that was no big secret.

just as it was no big secret the DNC preferred obama to hillary in 2008...

and just as the RNC preferred ANYONE BUT TRUMP. so what??

the wasserman resignation was already coming regardless...

this DNC email hacker leak "scandal" is timed for appearance sake only, just to suit the partisan hacks who have no real solutions, just attacks and artful smears of insinuation on political opponents supposedly so "crooked" with "corruption".

RNC hackers gonna hack, nothing to see here... their agenda is more honorable, so just trust them mmkay?
 
so what's the big deal the DNC preferred hillary...? that was no big secret.

just as it was no big secret the DNC preferred obama to hillary in 2008...

and just as the RNC preferred ANYONE BUT TRUMP. so what??

the wasserman resignation was already coming regardless...

this DNC email hacker leak "scandal" is timed for appearance sake only, just to suit the partisan hacks who have no real solutions, just attacks and artful smears of insinuation on political opponents supposedly so "crooked" with "corruption".

RNC hackers gonna hack, nothing to see here... their agenda is more honorable, so just trust them mmkay?
Bigger story is that Trump has a lot of money ties to Russia so it makes sense that Russia is trying to help him win. What that means for America I hate to think.
 
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal"

"Uranium One’s Russian takeover was approved by the United States while Hillary Rodham Clinton was secretary of state."

JPURANIUM5-master315.jpg



"Still, the company’s story was hardly front-page news in the United States — until early 2008, in the midst of Mrs. Clinton’s failed presidential campaign, when The Times published an article revealing the 2005 trip’s link to Mr. Giustra’s Kazakhstan mining deal. It also reported that several months later, Mr. Giustra had donated $31.3 million to Mr. Clinton’s foundation."


JPURANIUM4-master675-v2.jpg


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

New York Times.... xD
 
First of all the DNC is expected to be neutral.

And the President is expected to be intelligent. So I guess Hillary is out.

Second of all Bernie Sanders has been a de facto Democrat for 40 years.

False. He's been a socialist, and an independent for 40 years. Are you claiming that socialists are de factor Democrats? Your problem is that you see things in binary terms. You are so crippled by the false dilemma that you can't get it through your head that it's not an either/or proposition.

Third of all Bernie Sanders, of all the players in this race so far, turns out to be the one with the most integrity on either side.

Well then, he's definitely not a Democrat.

That's what makes those of us who support him even more right in the end.

This isn't a question of whether or not you like him. Like him all you want. Support him all you want. Hell, go vote for him in November if that's what makes you happy. Nobody can stop you from supporting him or from voting for him. None of that is at issue here. And none of that changes the fact that the DNC was right to want a real Democrat to be their nominee. Someone who has been with the party through thick and thin.

How about this....how would you feel if Donald Trump decided to run as a Democrat?

I think Trump is a Democrat. I would love it.
 
so what's the big deal the DNC preferred hillary...? that was no big secret.

just as it was no big secret the DNC preferred obama to hillary in 2008...

and just as the RNC preferred ANYONE BUT TRUMP. so what??

the wasserman resignation was already coming regardless...

this DNC email hacker leak "scandal" is timed for appearance sake only, just to suit the partisan hacks who have no real solutions, just attacks and artful smears of insinuation on political opponents supposedly so "crooked" with "corruption".

RNC hackers gonna hack, nothing to see here... their agenda is more honorable, so just trust them mmkay?
so you're saying the DNC Primaries are a sham? Thanks for clarifying that missy Valerie :thup:
 
Wrong.

First of all the DNC is expected to be neutral. Second of all Bernie Sanders has been a de facto Democrat for 40 years.

Indeed. He simply took off his mask before the rest.

Third of all Bernie Sanders, of all the players in this race so far, turns out to be the one with the most integrity on either side.

Throwing his supporters under the bus and endorsing one who tried to destroy him ain't exactly integrity.

That's what makes those of us who support him even more right in the end.

No, willful ignorance and blind stupidity drive the Left. Facsimile backbones have nothing to do with it.

Wrong. Sanders vowed to do all he could to defeat Trump and he is sticking to that pledge.

No one is being thrown under the bus. No self-respecting, legitimate Bernie Sanders supporter would ever want the Republicans rather than the Democrats in power in Washington.

Gee the lies you will tell. You don't speak for self-respecting Sanders supporters. I doesn't work that way, all you have is one lonely opinion, like everyone else. You elitist nut jobs are way off base.
 
At the end of the day Bernie, who the DNC set out to screw from the get go, supported the big corp financed clinton. Doesn't matter that his endorsement was 'tepid', he caved and endorsed her rather than sticking to his principles (wrong though they are). Spin it any way you want, his integrity is shot.

So you feel the party should have supported him but he shouldn't have to support the party?

The party didn't support him! They set out to screw him from the get go.

But did they?
Do you honestly believe that whatever the party did resulted in him losing by nearly 4 million votes?

I love Bernie but he never had a chance.

We'll never know. Crooked DNC is crooked.

I'm sure you are able to articulate how that was achieved. If not it's just another butthurt conspiracy.

Articulate how the DNC is crooked? :lol: Poor you.

Butthurt? Ba ha ha ha ha! You're funny.

Point IS, the DNC is shit and it was proven (yet again) today.
 
So you feel the party should have supported him but he shouldn't have to support the party?

The party didn't support him! They set out to screw him from the get go.

But did they?
Do you honestly believe that whatever the party did resulted in him losing by nearly 4 million votes?

I love Bernie but he never had a chance.

We'll never know. Crooked DNC is crooked.

I'm sure you are able to articulate how that was achieved. If not it's just another butthurt conspiracy.

Articulate how the DNC is crooked? :lol: Poor you.

Butthurt? Ba ha ha ha ha! You're funny.

Point IS, the DNC is shit and it was proven (yet again) today.
And the RNC isn't?
 
The party didn't support him! They set out to screw him from the get go.

But did they?
Do you honestly believe that whatever the party did resulted in him losing by nearly 4 million votes?

I love Bernie but he never had a chance.

We'll never know. Crooked DNC is crooked.

I'm sure you are able to articulate how that was achieved. If not it's just another butthurt conspiracy.

Articulate how the DNC is crooked? :lol: Poor you.

Butthurt? Ba ha ha ha ha! You're funny.

Point IS, the DNC is shit and it was proven (yet again) today.
And the RNC isn't?

Go fetch the emails.
 
if the Russians hacked the DNC server, I'm pretty certain they hacked the RNC Server as well... they leaked the emails at the doorstep of the DNC convention, yet kept the RNC emails in holding....why? Are the Russians saving the RNC emails as blackmail?

Those justifiably criticizing the DNC on back stabbing Bernie,

have to know in those RNC emails there was a CONCERTED EFFORT to back stab Trump, even much moreso, than the DNC did to Bernie...

In other words, the Republican playing all high and mighty on this issue shouldn't throw stones in glass houses... it'll always come back to bite ya!
 
if the Russians hacked the DNC server, I'm pretty certain they hacked the RNC Server as well... they leaked the emails at the doorstep of the DNC convention, yet kept the RNC emails in holding....why? Are the Russians saving the RNC emails as blackmail?

Those justifiably criticizing the DNC on back stabbing Bernie,

have to know in those RNC emails there was a CONCERTED EFFORT to back stab Trump, even much moreso, than the DNC did to Bernie...

In other words, the Republican playing all high and mighty on this issue shouldn't throw stones in glass houses... it'll always come back to bite ya!

If you're talking to me, Care, just say so. I'm not playing high and mighty. The Republicans suck almost as much as the Dems. I'm disgusted with both sides and I've no doubt the Rs did what they could to sideline Trump. Just so happens that the emails leaked this time pertain to the DNC. My gripe isn't even about that because seriously, no duh the Dems did what they did. Regardless of them, though, Bernie-the-anti-establishment-candidate screwed his supporters by backing the establishment.

btw, got a link to those R emails that you're pretty sure the Russians hacked?
 
so what's the big deal the DNC preferred hillary...? that was no big secret.

just as it was no big secret the DNC preferred obama to hillary in 2008...

and just as the RNC preferred ANYONE BUT TRUMP. so what??

the wasserman resignation was already coming regardless...

this DNC email hacker leak "scandal" is timed for appearance sake only, just to suit the partisan hacks who have no real solutions, just attacks and artful smears of insinuation on political opponents supposedly so "crooked" with "corruption".

RNC hackers gonna hack, nothing to see here... their agenda is more honorable, so just trust them mmkay?


so you're saying the DNC Primaries are a sham? Thanks for clarifying that missy Valerie :thup:




hello mcfly :lol:




Total individual popular votes in 2016 Democratic Primary

+ Hillary Clinton 15,805,136 + Bernie Sanders 12,029,699


* Hillary Clinton +3,775,437 :thup:



RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote

 
Sanders is not really a Democrat. He's been an independent for nearly 40 years. He's a socialist, not a Democrat. The party did the right thing by opposing his bid to represent the Democratic party. The parties should oppose candidates who don't represent the party and/or who are counter to the party's best interests. The DNC did what the RNC should have done with Trump from the get-go.

Using this logic, the same thing can be said about former Democrat, Drumpf.
 
Sanders was a democrat party candidate for president. What was the "right thing" that the DNC did to ensure Hillary's nomination? It couldn't have been legal or they wouldn't have fired their chairperson.
 

Forum List

Back
Top