The Don cannot find competent attorneys for Impeachment trial

[JimH52]

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

What Attorney that has an ounce of integrity would represent this treasonous buffoon? Not mentioning the problem with getting paid.

 

[Synthaholic]

Whoever takes the gig needs to get paid upfront.

 

[pknopp]

There are many lawyers that would likely take the case if they actually thought they would get paid.

 

[DBA]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

 

[pknopp]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

That isn't where it's tried.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

What Attorney that has an ounce of integrity would represent this treasonous buffoon? Not mentioning the problem with getting paid.

why would trump need lawyers to defend him in a "trial" that requires no evidence to convict?

 

[Mac1958]

Anybody who voluntarily comes within his orbit deserves the damage that will come to their career, dignity, profession, credibility and self respect.

Good luck, tough shit.

 

[Moonglow]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

That isn't where it's tried.

There are plenty of judiciary in the Senate.

 

[Crepitus]

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

What Attorney that has an ounce of integrity would represent this treasonous buffoon? Not mentioning the problem with getting paid.

Anybody who signs on needs to ask for money up front, no matter how competent they are or are not.

 

[Sunni Man]

Attorney that has an ounce of integrity

That's a very rare animal. ...

 

[Moonglow]

You mean that Powell and Giuliani are not jumping at the chance to save der Fuhrer?

 

[DBA]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

That isn't where it's tried.

I realize that. The judiciary in this case is the Senate. At least half of the Senate doesn’t care one bit about the facts.

 

[DBA]

Anybody who voluntarily comes within his orbit deserves the damage that will come to their career, dignity, profession, credibility and self respect.

Good luck, tough shit.

Can you point to the exact words Trump used to incite the attack on Capitol Hill? I’ll wait.

 

[HenryBHough]

What trial?

Xiden's agenda will rot on the vine with the Senate tied up for weeks debating whether or not there'll be any kangaroo kourt games.

 

[JustAGuy1]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

That isn't where it's tried.

Why are you running ?

 

[pknopp]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

That isn't where it's tried.

There are plenty of judiciary in the Senate.

It's not tried in the judiciary.

 

[pknopp]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

That isn't where it's tried.

I realize that. The judiciary in this case is the Senate. At least half of the Senate doesn’t care one bit about the facts.

He isn't going to be found guilty whether he is or not.

 

[MaryL]

I am trying to wrap my little mind around this. We have libprogdemocrats literally burning down cities over months. And months And Months! And we are force fed Demolibroproglicrats driven media misinformation about police and racism over and over and over again. And what did Trump do? He pissed of other wise sane people , Opps.

 

[MadDog]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

In case you haven’t noticed, the judiciary won’t be conducting the trial

 

[DBA]

It’s possibly the easiest case ever to defend based on the facts. The problem is, if you have a crooked judiciary it doesn’t matter.

In case you haven’t noticed, the judiciary won’t be conducting the trial

Its the Senate acting as a judiciary in this case. That was the point. I wasn’t referring to the Supreme Court.