Since this was never in court, your questions matter not.No need, that answers all. It's in the public record, look it up for yourself.They liked the wedding cake they bought there before, for the wedding of one of the mothers. And the payday the state provided because the vendor broke the law.There were about 360 other bakeries in the area, why did the faghadist pick that one? Did they have previous knowledge they would likely be refused? Were they just looking for a payday? Did anyone ask them under oath?
You got any answers to these? Don't tell me these questions are irrelevant either because they would be relevant do determining this so called harm.
That answers one question, you gonna try the rest?
So you don't know, no shame in that.
It hasn't been to court, yet.