- Sep 13, 2012
- 65,735
- 20,740
Bowman lied by indicating she was there and witnessed the events, she didn't. Her complete statement in the link is hear-say. A second had account, written in the first person, and not even an accurate one.
Nobody lied. The excerpt from the link I provided was the letter that Laurel Bowman wrote. WorldWatcher linked to the actual official complaint that was provided and signed by Rachel Cryer, who was present at the time the discrimination occurred. There were no lies.
A letter to whom?
And she was not present when the mother was supposedly quoted bible verses.
To the Oregon DOJ. Jesus fucking Christ it was right in the link AND the portion I quoted. The letter she penned started the events. The actual official complaint, which said nothing about being called anything (worldwatcher linked to it), was filed by the individual actually denied the service. Nobody lied.
And the letter she (Bowman) penned was a lie, written in the first person indicating she was present for the events.
You may perceive that, but that's your interpretation. The letter was not the official filed complaint. That was filed by the individual that was directly discriminated against.
No interpretation involved on Bowman's letter if you can read and I've already made the detection between the two documents. Cryer included hearsay in her complaint on item 5. because she was not present, according to Bowman's letter, when the baker made those statements to her mother.