The Election: I cannot accept

[koshergrl]

Lucky pc, to have a stalker as dedicated as NYC.

 

[konradv]

I am immovable, like General Jackson’s Virginians at First Manassas: a veritable stone wall.

As thick as one too, apparently. Too many of your posts make little sense at all.

I'm gonna suggest that the fact that you don't find the sense in the posts is an indictment of you, rather than of the posts.

Your posts are all over the place with very little connection to anything most would recognize as reality.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As thick as one too, apparently. Too many of your posts make little sense at all.

I'm gonna suggest that the fact that you don't find the sense in the posts is an indictment of you, rather than of the posts.

Your posts are all over the place with very little connection to anything most would recognize as reality.

It's your feral background.

Have you considered hiring a tutor?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Lucky pc, to have a stalker as dedicated as NYC.

He attached himself when I spoke to him in his native tongue: 'sit-stay-roll over.'

 

[francoHFW]

Arrogant AND dumb as a brick. I mean brainwashed(?).

 

[PoliticalChic]

Arrogant AND dumb as a brick. I mean brainwashed(?).

Brainwwashed???

Did you mention 'brainwashed'???

In this culture, there is only one avenue of brainwashing. So...for
your edification:

Leftism is so pervasive, that if applied to any other way of looking at life, it would be widely recognized as a form of brainwashing!

Imagine a person who attended only fundamental Christian schools from preschool through graduate school, who never saw a secular, let alone anti-Christian, film, and who only read religious books. Most would say that they had been ‘brainwashed.”

Yet, we regularly find individuals who only attended secular liberal schools from preschool through college, watched or listened to only Left-of-center television, movies, music, and had essentially no exposure to religious or conservative ideas. Brainwashed?

Of course not! Liberals are open-minded!!! The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been.

Now, Christians or Jews who have rarely been exposed to secular ideas and values would readily acknowledge same. It is only those on the Left who fool themselves into believing that they have been exposed to all points of view.

Universities have become to Liberalism what a Christian seminary is to Christianity. The difference is that Christian seminaries acknowledge their purpose, to produce committed Christians.

a. “The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible.” The University's Part in Political Life” (13 March 1909) in PWW (The Papers of Woodrow Wilson) 19:99.


b. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_ANRgcvjkk&feature=fvwrel]USA Eric Holder D.O.J "We Must Brainwash People About Guns" - YouTube[/ame]



Isn't that true, blanco?

NO???

Well, then...again: "The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been."


The witness may be excused.

 

[Moonglow]

You would get farther by extolling the virtues of not being myopic and seeing that both sides are guilty of plutocracy.

 

[Katzndogz]

All great nations commit suicide. This is ours. We are following the same path as all great nations that have collapsed into barbarism or subjugation by a stronger nation.

 

[Dr.Traveler]

You know, I keep saying this in other threads, and I'll say it here now:

You are all over reacting. All of you.

Step back for a moment and look at the election as a whole. The incumbents for the most part won in nearly all the national offices. There were exceptions and random senators and congressmen unseated, but for the most part the larger picture was, incumbents win. Which they statistically do.

You all are freaking out about Obama winning, but keep in mind, the GOP held the House and most of the Democratic gains in the Senate had more to do with unvetted idiots being idiots and losing elections.

So the country absolutely did not give either party a ringing endorsement of their policy or dogmas, it simply re-elected gridlock.

If there's a larger lesson for the DNC to learn, it's a question of why their candidates seem to do well in larger scale elections (Senate and President) but fall apart on the more local level (House).

For the GOP, the lesson is how do you take what's working on the local level (House races), and make it work at the national level. Especially, how do you sell a Southern Conservative world view to a place like Massachusetts where one of the few incumbent GOP Senators lost.

For the American People, I think the larger lesson is how do we bridge the extremes in politics to get actual stuff done. The People clearly don't trust either party enough to trust them with control of Washington. Following 2000-2006 (GOP years) and 2008-2010 (DNC years) I can't say I'd trust either party either. So what happens next?

The biggest challenge facing out nation isn't the apocalyptic scenarios you all laid out. It's how we find compromise and what does that even look like now?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You would get farther by extolling the virtues of not being myopic and seeing that both sides are guilty of plutocracy.

What, pray tell, do you conceive as the 'both sides'?

Surely you don't see them as the Republicans and the Democrats.


Do you, Shirley?

 

[PoliticalChic]

All great nations commit suicide. This is ours. We are following the same path as all great nations that have collapsed into barbarism or subjugation by a stronger nation.

Katzy....

...the veracity of your post is exactly what I fear, and the predictions of John Fonte's "Sovereignty or Submission."


The Obama types, the Western elites/progressives, are working with the UN to absorb this nation into a bureaucrat-directed global government.


The Pod People, the anencephalic fail to see the direction they wish to take up, even though our Founders wrote of it in the Declaration...

The colonists raised a charge against King George III based on sovereignty:
“He has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.”


Those of us with knowledge see the tragedy afoot.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You know, I keep saying this in other threads, and I'll say it here now:

You are all over reacting. All of you.

Step back for a moment and look at the election as a whole. The incumbents for the most part won in nearly all the national offices. There were exceptions and random senators and congressmen unseated, but for the most part the larger picture was, incumbents win. Which they statistically do.

You all are freaking out about Obama winning, but keep in mind, the GOP held the House and most of the Democratic gains in the Senate had more to do with unvetted idiots being idiots and losing elections.

So the country absolutely did not give either party a ringing endorsement of their policy or dogmas, it simply re-elected gridlock.

If there's a larger lesson for the DNC to learn, it's a question of why their candidates seem to do well in larger scale elections (Senate and President) but fall apart on the more local level (House).

For the GOP, the lesson is how do you take what's working on the local level (House races), and make it work at the national level. Especially, how do you sell a Southern Conservative world view to a place like Massachusetts where one of the few incumbent GOP Senators lost.

For the American People, I think the larger lesson is how do we bridge the extremes in politics to get actual stuff done. The People clearly don't trust either party enough to trust them with control of Washington. Following 2000-2006 (GOP years) and 2008-2010 (DNC years) I can't say I'd trust either party either. So what happens next?

The biggest challenge facing out nation isn't the apocalyptic scenarios you all laid out. It's how we find compromise and what does that even look like now?

"You are all over reacting. All of you."


In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," the Jewish passenger voices a sentiment akin to yours: "What are they (the Nazis) going to do....kill all of us?"


You're not a stupid person, Trav....I suggest you look at post #51, and, if you have the time, pick up a copy of John Fonte's "Sovereignty or Submission."


The hand-writing is on the wall.
It's past time to over-react.

 

[NYcarbineer]

All great nations commit suicide. This is ours. We are following the same path as all great nations that have collapsed into barbarism or subjugation by a stronger nation.

The only nation that's dying is the imaginary nation of Conservatopia that rightwing nuts were foolish enough to believe might someday exist for real.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You know, I keep saying this in other threads, and I'll say it here now:

You are all over reacting. All of you.

Step back for a moment and look at the election as a whole. The incumbents for the most part won in nearly all the national offices. There were exceptions and random senators and congressmen unseated, but for the most part the larger picture was, incumbents win. Which they statistically do.

You all are freaking out about Obama winning, but keep in mind, the GOP held the House and most of the Democratic gains in the Senate had more to do with unvetted idiots being idiots and losing elections.

So the country absolutely did not give either party a ringing endorsement of their policy or dogmas, it simply re-elected gridlock.

If there's a larger lesson for the DNC to learn, it's a question of why their candidates seem to do well in larger scale elections (Senate and President) but fall apart on the more local level (House).

For the GOP, the lesson is how do you take what's working on the local level (House races), and make it work at the national level. Especially, how do you sell a Southern Conservative world view to a place like Massachusetts where one of the few incumbent GOP Senators lost.

For the American People, I think the larger lesson is how do we bridge the extremes in politics to get actual stuff done. The People clearly don't trust either party enough to trust them with control of Washington. Following 2000-2006 (GOP years) and 2008-2010 (DNC years) I can't say I'd trust either party either. So what happens next?

The biggest challenge facing out nation isn't the apocalyptic scenarios you all laid out. It's how we find compromise and what does that even look like now?

"You are all over reacting. All of you."


In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," the Jewish passenger voices a sentiment akin to yours: "What are they (the Nazis) going to do....kill all of us?"


You're not a stupid person, Trav....I suggest you look at post #51, and, if you have the time, pick up a copy of John Fonte's "Sovereignty or Submission."


The hand-writing is on the wall.
It's past time to over-react.

So Timothy McVeigh wasn't evil, he was just a bit ahead of his time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Ann Applebaum of the Washington Post, has just written a book, “Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe.’ Said ‘crushing’ was based both on both the extreme violence of war, and the slow, ineluctable penetration of government into every aspect of the people’s existence. This is called totalitarian government.

a. From one review of the book: “… some scholars were sure that Communism had its bad points, but capitalism and its ideology represented by America were worse.”

2. Some ‘scholars.’ What will scholars say about Americans who gave in to the same without even being under the gun, the violence of war? Lack of interest? Lack of focus? Lack of knowledge of history and of human nature? Or did the people who once were famed for their ‘Can Do’ attitude simply get tired of personal responsibility and pride?




3. Let me give credit to the Alinsky designs, the vicious personal attacks, the lies that were supported by the media, the class warfare. A respectable, religious man, successful in business, who has demonstrated an ability to govern, attacked and sullied by a socialist raised by communists, steeped in 20 years in a Marxist church, a failure in economic policy as well as foreign policy….yet he proved that the more despicable the campaign, the more successful…

a. “Barack Obama’s aides and advisers are preparing to center the president’s reelection campaign on a ferocious personal assault on Mitt Romney’s character and business background,… unabashedly negative…”
Obama plan: Destroy Romney - Ben Smith and Jonathan Martin - POLITICO.com




4. And, let’s give credit as well, to a progressive philosophy which promises all things to all people…it’s charm predicted by Tocqueville, and it’s danger explained by Sowell:

a. Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”

b. Sowell takes the key political issues and challenges the reader to analyze not only their short term (Stage One) political impact but to also think ahead to their long term (Stage Two, Three, etc) economic impact. He reminds the reader that politicians do not think beyond Stage One because they will be praised (and elected) for the short term benefits but will not be held accountable much later when the long term consequences appear. From a review of “Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One,” Thomas Sowell




5. So, through ignorance, or ineptitude, or avarice, half of the population has sold out the glory of what America was, submission rather than sovereignty. We are living through the fall of the Roman Empire, the crushing of Eastern Europe, the supremacy of the collective.
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.
T.S. Eliot.

Such effort. With such schizophrenic results.

I wonder if you will gracefully accept real, sincere advice?

Try to write like a normal person so we can better digest what you are trying to say. While unique, your style is not working for you.

It’s not working for anyone.

Particularly when one realizes ‘out of context’ is not a ‘style.’

Would you mind proving that you understand the meaning of ‘out of context’

by giving examples of same from the OP....


....or is your post merely an attempt to appear relevant?

 

[Plasmaball]

aw the butthurt

 

[PoliticalChic]

You know, I keep saying this in other threads, and I'll say it here now:

You are all over reacting. All of you.

Step back for a moment and look at the election as a whole. The incumbents for the most part won in nearly all the national offices. There were exceptions and random senators and congressmen unseated, but for the most part the larger picture was, incumbents win. Which they statistically do.

You all are freaking out about Obama winning, but keep in mind, the GOP held the House and most of the Democratic gains in the Senate had more to do with unvetted idiots being idiots and losing elections.

So the country absolutely did not give either party a ringing endorsement of their policy or dogmas, it simply re-elected gridlock.

If there's a larger lesson for the DNC to learn, it's a question of why their candidates seem to do well in larger scale elections (Senate and President) but fall apart on the more local level (House).

For the GOP, the lesson is how do you take what's working on the local level (House races), and make it work at the national level. Especially, how do you sell a Southern Conservative world view to a place like Massachusetts where one of the few incumbent GOP Senators lost.

For the American People, I think the larger lesson is how do we bridge the extremes in politics to get actual stuff done. The People clearly don't trust either party enough to trust them with control of Washington. Following 2000-2006 (GOP years) and 2008-2010 (DNC years) I can't say I'd trust either party either. So what happens next?

The biggest challenge facing out nation isn't the apocalyptic scenarios you all laid out. It's how we find compromise and what does that even look like now?

"You are all over reacting. All of you."


In Katherine Anne Porter's "Ship of Fools," the Jewish passenger voices a sentiment akin to yours: "What are they (the Nazis) going to do....kill all of us?"


You're not a stupid person, Trav....I suggest you look at post #51, and, if you have the time, pick up a copy of John Fonte's "Sovereignty or Submission."


The hand-writing is on the wall.
It's past time to over-react.

So Timothy McVeigh wasn't evil, he was just a bit ahead of his time.

A moment, while I get out my Rosetta Stone to find the meaning of your post.



In the meantime, jot this down, as it clearly is both a new word, and a new concept for you:


ar·tic·u·late/ärˈtikyəlit/

Adjective:
(of a person or a person's words) Having or showing the ability to speak fluently and coherently.

Verb:
Express (an idea or feeling) fluently and coherently: "they were unable to articulate their emotions".



Based on your writing skills, I bet there are times you simply slap a paw print on the paper.

 

[PoliticalChic]

aw the butthurt

Another brilliant post!


I'm amazed at your consistency.

 

[Cowman]

Sarah Palin called it when she said Romney needs to personalize the campaign against Obama. She said it in 08, was ignored, we lost. She said it again in 12 was ignored and we lost again

Sarah Palin is a one way ticket to assfucksylvania for you guys. Don't go there, I hear it's painful.

 

[Zoom]

Sarah Palin called it when she said Romney needs to personalize the campaign against Obama. She said it in 08, was ignored, we lost. She said it again in 12 was ignored and we lost again

Lets see if I got this right. Romney lost because he didnt listen to Palin?

OH wow.

Please dont stop.




Clinton 2016!