🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The end of "The Period of American WO"

LaDexter

Gold Member
Jun 5, 2016
10,361
843
290
In January of 2001, the US had

1. real full employment, not the BS today with 90 million people "assumed out of the workforce"
2. a budget SURPLUS
3. strong WAGE INFLATION with nobody bitching about the minimum wage
4. a competitive economy
5. the economy was competitive because government spending was 25% of GDP, while at the end of WO it is 50%.
6. high schools free from prescription pills


After the two disasters W and O, we have

1. 19 trillion in debt and a 600 billion deficit
2. a sick liar claiming 5% unemployment by assuming 90 million Americans are "out of the workforce"
3. rapidly growing homeless despite the "strong" economy
4. our troops scattered in multiple countries where they never should've been deployed originally
5. the people behind 911 still free, rich, and in power here and in Israel
6. our high schools are flooded with taxpayer funded pills, and our kids are using them - thanks to "conservative" W socializing senior drugs by lying to Congress about the estimated cost
7. the "climate scientists" still fudging data since O made them above the law by covering up the FBI fraud case against them - that's in the ballpark of a $100 billion per year drain on the whole economy to pay left wing liars to keep fudging data
8. race relations in horrible shape because bigot O kept race baiting and discriminating the entire 8 years


In the end, to fix America post WO, we need to

1. CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING back to the levels they were in the 1990s
2. prosecute the climate "scientists" with the 2010 FBI fraud case O covered up
3. re-open the 911 investigation

Anything less than that will be a total failure to make America Great again after the Period of American WO
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3




No, it was really a surplus, and the Period of American WO is very well documented by this above chart......
 
In January of 2001, the US had

1. real full employment, not the BS today with 90 million people "assumed out of the workforce"
2. a budget SURPLUS
3. strong WAGE INFLATION with nobody bitching about the minimum wage
4. a competitive economy
5. the economy was competitive because government spending was 25% of GDP, while at the end of WO it is 50%.
6. high schools free from prescription pills


After the two disasters W and O, we have

1. 19 trillion in debt and a 600 billion deficit
2. a sick liar claiming 5% unemployment by assuming 90 million Americans are "out of the workforce"
3. rapidly growing homeless despite the "strong" economy
4. our troops scattered in multiple countries where they never should've been deployed originally
5. the people behind 911 still free, rich, and in power here and in Israel
6. our high schools are flooded with taxpayer funded pills, and our kids are using them - thanks to "conservative" W socializing senior drugs by lying to Congress about the estimated cost
7. the "climate scientists" still fudging data since O made them above the law by covering up the FBI fraud case against them - that's in the ballpark of a $100 billion per year drain on the whole economy to pay left wing liars to keep fudging data
8. race relations in horrible shape because bigot O kept race baiting and discriminating the entire 8 years


In the end, to fix America post WO, we need to

1. CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING back to the levels they were in the 1990s
2. prosecute the climate "scientists" with the 2010 FBI fraud case O covered up
3. re-open the 911 investigation

Anything less than that will be a total failure to make America Great again after the Period of American WO



1. There was never a Clinton surplus.
Never.


It is one of those lies that Democrat simpletons seem ready to swallow.
See if you can regurgitate all of it...the whole hook, line,, and sinker.

2. Would you like to see the actual national debt figures?
1993 4,351,044
1994 4,643,307
1995 4,920,586
1996 5,181,465
1997 5,369,206
1998 5,478,189
1999 5,605,523
2000 5,628,700

end of FY 2001, which was President Clinton's last budget.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (table 7.1)

The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm

That means the debt increased 41% under Clinton.
And no wars or military build up to blame it on!



Analogy that explains the bogus "Clinton Surplus"

1. You go to the bank and borrow $5,000 to take a trip to the Bahamas
2. You cancel the daily paper while you're away
3.When you return, you look at the household budget, and note that you saved $10 by not getting the paper delivered....never considering the Bahamas loan you're going to have to pay back $5,000 for the trip....
...you begin hooping and hollering 'I have a surplus! Yippee!'
4. You function this way because you're an idiot.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
You can spin and fudge and whine all you want. The Gingrich budget "surplus" was real, it helped the dollar, the US economy, the perception of stability and solvency, and it coincided with a period of great US economic performance for all classes including the very poor.

The Period of American WO did just the opposite.

So spin and whine about a billion here or there, the National Debt was less than a third of what it is today when W took office.
 
You can spin and fudge and whine all you want. The Gingrich budget "surplus" was real, it helped the dollar, the US economy, the perception of stability and solvency, and it coincided with a period of great US economic performance for all classes including the very poor.

The Period of American WO did just the opposite.

So spin and whine about a billion here or there, the National Debt was less than a third of what it is today when W took office.


There is no spin here, you moron.
These are facts.

I just provided the actual figures from the Treasury....and the analogy that explains why you are an idiot.



Would you like to see the actual national debt figures?
1993 4,351,044
1994 4,643,307
1995 4,920,586
1996 5,181,465
1997 5,369,206
1998 5,478,189
1999 5,605,523
2000 5,628,700

end of FY 2001, which was President Clinton's last budget.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (table 7.1)

The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm

That means the debt increased 41% under Clinton.
And no wars or military build up to blame it on!

There was never a surplus...not in any year of Clinton's presidency.


Bet you even believe that the Russians altered the election in Trump's favor, huh?

Double idiot.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
why you are an idiot.


... because I think the closer we are to balancing the budget, the better off we are as a country - that's "idiocy" according to you...

You are whining about assumptions, accrued expenses, projections of future liability etc.

I am trying to document that we were better off when we have our government spending LESS and running up LESS DEBT. Apparently, you like America with 20 trillion worth of debt vs. 6....
 
There is NO RECENT Year with NO DEFICIT, there was one year with a BUDGET surplus they are completely different things. The GINGRICH HOUSE BUDGET was a BALANCED BUDGET, the Y2K tech bubble gave more revenue than was expected, and there WAS more revenue than the budgeted outlay agreed on. That gave a surplus of money for that years BUDGET. There was not even close to enough money BUDGETED or available that year to pay off the US deficit which is the now the close to 20 TRILLION DOLLAR number.
 
why you are an idiot.


... because I think the closer we are to balancing the budget, the better off we are as a country - that's "idiocy" according to you...

You are whining about assumptions, accrued expenses, projections of future liability etc.

I am trying to document that we were better off when we have our government spending LESS and running up LESS DEBT. Apparently, you like America with 20 trillion worth of debt vs. 6....



Because you accept propaganda as fact.

Check my figures....Treasure of US figures.


And, believing anything from the Clinton machine is a priori evidence of idiocy.


How about you never again claim any 'Clinton Surplus' and leave it at that.
 
That gave a surplus of money for that years BUDGET.


Budgets can be greatly manipulated by assumptions, including future interest rate levels, mortality assumptions etc.

That concept is way beyond the pie holed birdbrain of PoliticalChic
 
So, if it is just a "projected" surplus depending on assumptions, it must be bad, because bigger deficits and more national debt are just great ....

Sincerely,

The "US media"
the Democrats
the post 1998 Republicans
 
...Treasure of US figures.


You are obviously not a CPA or a CFA. You just parrot and parrot and parrot and ignore the reality of the opening post.


You imbecile: I provide the Treasury figures!!!

These:

These are the actual national debt figures:
1993 4,351,044
1994 4,643,307
1995 4,920,586
1996 5,181,465
1997 5,369,206
1998 5,478,189
1999 5,605,523
2000 5,628,700

end of FY 2001, which was President Clinton's last budget.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (table 7.1)

The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm

That means the debt increased 41% under Clinton.
And no wars or military build up to blame it on!


Go get a magnifying glass and a calculator and see if any year showed a decrease.



Admit it: there was never....NEVER....any such Clinton surplus as you stated.
 

Forum List

Back
Top