The end of "The Period of American WO"

[LaDexter]

The only disaster was W

This from a partisan hack who loved it when bigot O lied to the medical marijuana crowd.

Franco wants the hacks investigated, but not any investigation into CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debate.

In many ways, O was actually worse than W, if that is possible...

 

[NYcarbineer]

In January of 2001, the US had

1. real full employment, not the BS today with 90 million people "assumed out of the workforce"
2. a budget SURPLUS
3. strong WAGE INFLATION with nobody bitching about the minimum wage
4. a competitive economy
5. the economy was competitive because government spending was 25% of GDP, while at the end of WO it is 50%.
6. high schools free from prescription pills


After the two disasters W and O, we have

1. 19 trillion in debt and a 600 billion deficit
2. a sick liar claiming 5% unemployment by assuming 90 million Americans are "out of the workforce"
3. rapidly growing homeless despite the "strong" economy
4. our troops scattered in multiple countries where they never should've been deployed originally
5. the people behind 911 still free, rich, and in power here and in Israel
6. our high schools are flooded with taxpayer funded pills, and our kids are using them - thanks to "conservative" W socializing senior drugs by lying to Congress about the estimated cost
7. the "climate scientists" still fudging data since O made them above the law by covering up the FBI fraud case against them - that's in the ballpark of a $100 billion per year drain on the whole economy to pay left wing liars to keep fudging data
8. race relations in horrible shape because bigot O kept race baiting and discriminating the entire 8 years


In the end, to fix America post WO, we need to

1. CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING back to the levels they were in the 1990s
2. prosecute the climate "scientists" with the 2010 FBI fraud case O covered up
3. re-open the 911 investigation

Anything less than that will be a total failure to make America Great again after the Period of American WO

Maybe that's why by 3 million votes Americans tried to elect another Clinton.

lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

The W regime is back in charge. Fool you twice shame on you.

 

[12icer]

That gave a surplus of money for that years BUDGET.

Budgets can be greatly manipulated by assumptions, including future interest rate levels, mortality assumptions etc.

That concept is way beyond the pie holed birdbrain of PoliticalChic

Point being what? The report is given to the GAO, CBO and OMB. It is recorded, and signed. That is the final draft for the budget that year. IF the budget is amended it must go through the same process. The recorded budget is either balanced, deficit, or surplus depending on the amount of revenue the government makes in in the budget year. That is impossible to "manipulate" So enlighten me as to your idea by CIP.

 

[LaDexter]

Maybe that's why by 3 million votes Americans tried to elect another Clinton.

I sincerely question your definition of "American."

Illegals are not "Americans."

 

[francoHFW]

...Treasure of US figures.

You are obviously not a CPA or a CFA. You just parrot and parrot and parrot and ignore the reality of the opening post.

You imbecile: I provide the Treasury figures!!!

These:

These are the actual national debt figures:
1993 4,351,044
1994 4,643,307
1995 4,920,586
1996 5,181,465
1997 5,369,206
1998 5,478,189
1999 5,605,523
2000 5,628,700

end of FY 2001, which was President Clinton's last budget.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (table 7.1)

The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm

That means the debt increased 41% under Clinton.
And no wars or military build up to blame it on!


Go get a magnifying glass and a calculator and see if any year showed a decrease.



Admit it: there was never....NEVER....any such Clinton surplus as you stated.

And 190% under Raygun, and doubled under W. The schmucks that gave us this pander to the rich mess...

 

[LaDexter]

That is impossible to "manipulate"

BULL.

Big construction projects that take years can have their expenses spread out evenly, or unevenly, according to

ASSUMPTIONS

Not every government expenditure is current. Some are delayed. To account for that, the accountant makes

ASSUMPTIONS

but one has to have SOME UNDERSTANDING of accounting to have a clue here, and you and political chic do not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I provide the Treasury figures!!!

LOL!!!


This absolutely brainless bitch keeps parroting without any clue WHAT ASSUMPTIONS WERE USED.

As soon as folks like you know you've been thoroughly eviscerated (better look that up, dunce)...the vulgarity begins.

 

[12icer]

Maybe that's why by 3 million votes Americans tried to elect another Clinton.

lol

Yeah maybe because they were stupid enough to believe that a balance budget for a year meant there was no deficit. I know a lot of liberal idiots that think that is true, It just proves how far down the ladder liberal voters are. The funny thing is most are liberal college grads, the ones who the news media talk about voting for the stupid bitch.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Maybe that's why by 3 million votes Americans tried to elect another Clinton.

I sincerely question your definition of "American."

Illegals are not "Americans."

lol, one more added to my list of fuckwits who think Trump won the popular vote.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Maybe that's why by 3 million votes Americans tried to elect another Clinton.

lol

Yeah maybe because they were stupid enough to believe that a balance budget for a year meant there was no deficit. I know a lot of liberal idiots that think that is true, It just proves how far down the ladder liberal voters are. The funny thing is most are liberal college grads, the ones who the news media talk about voting for the stupid bitch.

There was no budget deficit for 3 years.

 

[LaDexter]

The W regime is back in charge.

If Trump does not re-open the 911 investigation or not have the DOJ prosecute the climate "scientists," you will be right...

 

[PoliticalChic]

...Treasure of US figures.

You are obviously not a CPA or a CFA. You just parrot and parrot and parrot and ignore the reality of the opening post.

You imbecile: I provide the Treasury figures!!!

These:

These are the actual national debt figures:
1993 4,351,044
1994 4,643,307
1995 4,920,586
1996 5,181,465
1997 5,369,206
1998 5,478,189
1999 5,605,523
2000 5,628,700

end of FY 2001, which was President Clinton's last budget.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (table 7.1)

The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm

That means the debt increased 41% under Clinton.
And no wars or military build up to blame it on!


Go get a magnifying glass and a calculator and see if any year showed a decrease.



Admit it: there was never....NEVER....any such Clinton surplus as you stated.

And 190% under Raygun, and doubled under W. The schmucks that gave us this pander to the rich mess...

You're really a slow learner....or, a non-learner.


1. Under Reagan, the debt went up $1.7 trillion, from $900 billion to $2.6 trillion.
2. But….the national wealth went up $ 17 trillion
3. Reagan's near-trillion-dollar bulge in defense spending transformed the global balance of power in favor of capitalism. Spurring a stock-market, energy, venture-capital, real-estate and employment boom, the Reagan tax-rate cuts and other pro-enterprise policies added some $17 trillion to America's private-sector assets, dwarfing the trillion-dollar rise in public-sector deficits and creating 45 million net new jobs at rising wages and salaries.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444914904577621083163383966.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics#Fiscal_consequences



Pop quiz:
Which is greater, $1.7 or $17

C'mon.....you can do it!


Don't you wish Obama had Reagan's success?

Obama sure does.

 

[francoHFW]

Maybe that's why by 3 million votes Americans tried to elect another Clinton.

I sincerely question your definition of "American."

Illegals are not "Americans."

Ilegals don't vote, moron.

 

[LaDexter]

Ilegals don't vote

LOL!!!

No illegal aliens voted. No dead vote for Hillary. Hillary and the Dems are honest people.

Thanks, Franco. Now go back and watch Huma and Hillary dyke off together...

 

[jc456]

Maybe that's why by 3 million votes Americans tried to elect another Clinton.

I sincerely question your definition of "American."

Illegals are not "Americans."

lol, one more added to my list of fuckwits who think Trump won the popular vote.

He did! 30 out of 50 states voted for trump. 60%

 

[jc456]

Maybe that's why by 3 million votes Americans tried to elect another Clinton.

I sincerely question your definition of "American."

Illegals are not "Americans."

Ilegals don't vote, moron.

Illegals do though

 

[FA_Q2]

That gave a surplus of money for that years BUDGET.

Budgets can be greatly manipulated by assumptions, including future interest rate levels, mortality assumptions etc.

That concept is way beyond the pie holed birdbrain of PoliticalChic

Sure the budget can. The historical national debt figures - the ones that politicalchick has been quoting - however cannot and it does not include any assumptions at all. We had a so called surplus and STILL managed to grow the debt because of the way that SS is calculated.

 

[LaDexter]

The historical national debt figures - the ones that politicalchick has been quoting - however cannot

Some big defense contracts like planes and ships have big upfront payments for future deliveries.

The debt goes up. The ship is built after, and then delivered. It is all about

ASSUMPTIONS.

A simple cost accounting doesn't give an accurate picture of the whole.

 

[FA_Q2]

The historical national debt figures - the ones that politicalchick has been quoting - however cannot

Some big defense contracts like planes and ships have big upfront payments for future deliveries.

The debt goes up. The ship is built after, and then delivered. It is all about

ASSUMPTIONS.

A simple cost accounting doesn't give an accurate picture of the whole.

That is not an assumption. That money is spent - end of story.

The debt rises. Payoffs for current spending are almost always in the future. That does not make that spending an assumption. The money is gone no matter what.