The evidence Trump was wiretapped laid out clearly by Mark Levin

Campaign officials speak to foreign officials all the time. I don't see the grand 'Conspiracy' the Democrats are claiming. If Trump or anyone in his Campaign were officially surveilled, it would represent an incredibly dark event in our history..

Do you know how many phones there are in Trump Tower? And Flynn could have used any one of them to call the russian ambassador.

On the other hand:

2641 Tunlaw Rd., N.W.
Washington, DC 20007.
Phone: (202) 939-8907, (202) 939-8913.
Fax: (202) 483-7579.
Contact the Embassy | Embassy of the Russian Federation

The russian ambassador has only a couple of phones in his office,
 
Trump associates were speaking with Russians. Anything other than that is a distraction.

Wasn't it the same Russian that was sitting with the democrats at Trumps speech to congress, were is your anger with democrats. And it's not fake news, he is sitting there in full view.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sitting there is just as bad as private meetings and lying about it? Thats a stretch pal.
 
If proven true, it's so much more egregious than Watergate. A sitting President ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President? Could that really happen here? I didn't think it could.

Well we had a candidate telling the Russians to hack the server of his opposition. And also promising to throw his opposition in jail if he won. Guess who that candidate was?
 
If a foreigner who is being monitored under a FISA order calls you, or you call him, that does not force law enforcement to terminate the monitoring/recording.

Because the foreign agent is still the primary. Secondaries don't matter. Imagine if under your scenario, Osama BinLaden would call "joes pizza" and after establishing he was talking to "joe" an american citizen, he told him to put on Mohammad Atta.
 
Disagreed about your evasion. Agreed that FISA orders don't void Fourth Amendment rights. So if an ISIS agent calls an American, does NSA need to stop recording? Yes or no, please. No evasions. :)


The answer is a clear NO, they continue to record. That's the law. As long as the primary is the target, who he talks to doesn't matter. Who called who, doesn't matter.
 
Yesterday, in 14 short and exciting minutes of televised explanation, Mark Levin pointed out the evidence already on the public record indicating spying on President-Elect Trump.

LevinBlog: The evidence Trump was wiretapped laid out clearly by Mark Levin

There is no direct admission by Obama that he knew nor is there direct evidence that he knew.

It is akin to people saying Hitler knew nothing of the Holocaust.

I'm sure Obama learned about it all on the 6 o'clock news, just like he did the IRS scandal as the IRS hunted down conservatives for audit.
 
Trump associates were speaking with Russians. Anything other than that is a distraction.

And the Attorney General met privately with Bill Clinton as Hillary was being investigated by the FBI.

So what? You did not care then why do you care now?
 
If the FISA order results in eavesdropping on U.S. citizens and the raw data of that eaves dropping is spread around 16 agencies in the Executive branch, then the Fourth Amendment is violated.

That's why, before the patriot act, they had a WALL, remember the wall, between intelligence agencies and law enforcement. To protect the 4th amendment rights of americans. Did you ever complain about the wall being dismantled during the Bush years?
 
Trump associates were speaking with Russians. Anything other than that is a distraction.

And the Attorney General met privately with Bill Clinton as Hillary was being investigated by the FBI.

So what? You did not care then why do you care now?
Because of that the Attorney General recused herself, and the DOJ from the Clinton investigation.
 
Trump associates were speaking with Russians. Anything other than that is a distraction.

And the Attorney General met privately with Bill Clinton as Hillary was being investigated by the FBI.

So what? You did not care then why do you care now?
Because of that the Attorney General recused herself, and the DOJ from the Clinton investigation.

The Attorney General should have resigned like Flynn did.

Instead, she goes around lecturing everyone how terrible Trump is.
 
I would suggest that Hillary shares the same prison cell as Obama to save taxpayers money.
 
The Attorney General should have resigned like Flynn did.

Instead, she goes around lecturing everyone how terrible Trump is.

Last I heard, BIll Clinton wasn't a Russian agent. Nor did he lie about their having met.
 
it%2Bwasn%2527t%2Bthe%2BRussians.jpg
 
If the FISA order results in eavesdropping on U.S. citizens and the raw data of that eaves dropping is spread around 16 agencies in the Executive branch, then the Fourth Amendment is violated.

That's why, before the patriot act, they had a WALL, remember the wall, between intelligence agencies and law enforcement. To protect the 4th amendment rights of americans. Did you ever complain about the wall being dismantled during the Bush years?

Actually, yes. I was quite appalled at Total Information Awareness when it was announced. But this isn't a Wall issue. This is a breach of the wall. The proper process was to share findings, not raw data...and the identity of U.S. citizens and residents who were incidental to the investigation was supposed to be protected. That's not what happened here.
 
Trump associates were speaking with Russians. Anything other than that is a distraction.

And the Attorney General met privately with Bill Clinton as Hillary was being investigated by the FBI.

So what? You did not care then why do you care now?

1. All of the evidence came from the MSM, and if it was a lie, it means every talking point the far left have been using is bogus.

2. The MSM, the Democrats, or both are going to take a big hit on this, no doubt about it.

3. Under a FISA warrant, if a foreigner calls a US citizen, and the US citizen is not duplicit, then the remarks of the citizen are to be expunged. That is the law.

4. Was the FISA warrant illegal, if in fact there was one? No! But, if what was reported by the MSM was true, that the WH inner staff was kept up to date of the conversations, then yes it 100% is. If the left wants to bitch at someone, then bitch at the reporting agency, not Americans who read what they reported.

5. Want this to go away far left? Then demand that the NYT, Washington Post, LA Times, Mcklatchey, The Guardian, and all others involved print a retraction on their stories, including what their stories showed Trump was doing by printing that with fake evidence. That means all your talking points are null and void!

We as Republicans don't have to do a thing. Why? Because the only two outcomes of this is either your MSM is lying, the Democrats who gave them information were subversive and were lying, or the Democrats weren't lying to the media, committed a felony, and now we have Watergate 2.0.

You people decide which will be less damaging to you, and we will eat popcorn and laugh as you try and wiggle out of this conundrum.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 

Forum List

Back
Top