Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Straw Man argument, if not a fucking lie. Please quote a single post where I advocated sharing national intelligence data with press or for political assassination purposes much less both: "the press for political assassination purposes".Thank you for your inability to see that listening in on Russians, Chinese, Iranian and ISIS communications doesn't necessitate sharing Raw Data on U.S. Citizens with the press for political assassination purposes.
Straw Man argument, if not a fucking lie. Please quote a single post where I advocated sharing national intelligence data with press or for political assassination purposes much less both: "the press for political assassination purposes".Thank you for your inability to see that listening in on Russians, Chinese, Iranian and ISIS communications doesn't necessitate sharing Raw Data on U.S. Citizens with the press for political assassination purposes.
Please quote just one post. If you can, I'll pay you $10,000. If you can't, you owe me $10. Fair?
Isn't this what the thread is about? Are you asserting that our intelligence services monitored the strictly domestic calls of Trump or his workers?Right backatcha bub. I never said we shouldn't monitor foreign communications. My objection was to political hacks leaking raw data about U.S. citizens.
And there isn't any amount of money that will buy your way out of that.
Isn't this what the thread is about? Are you asserting that our intelligence services monitored the strictly domestic calls of Trump or his workers?Right backatcha bub. I never said we shouldn't monitor foreign communications. My objection was to political hacks leaking raw data about U.S. citizens.
And there isn't any amount of money that will buy your way out of that.
Wrong, CNN is.Breitbart is the gold standard of fake news .
He's trying to play the angle that the tap was on the other end of the line and not on Trump's phone.And remember Lynch's tarmac meeting with Bubba....the Clinton's have a hand in this as well.
Post a conversation from a Trump phone that Obama wiretapped.
You are a moron. The Liberal Media that you worship is replete with stories about wire-tapping of Trump's campaign.
Yep. And the word parsing is a big clue that there is a coordinated effort by the Obama-Clinton coalition to manage the narrative. "Obama didn't order a wiretap" and the demands for a transcript of a wiretap are just squirrels.
The real issue is that Obama abused the power of his office to fish for dirt on a political opponent...didn't find any...but released raw data out of context to hundreds of operatives in the executive branch. And now he's leading The Resistance. Worst President an Ex-President EVER.
So the demand for actual EVIDENCE of Obama's involvement in an illegal wiretap is inappropriate? Irrelevant?
Goddam that's funny. You are even dumber than your past incarnations.
Isn't this what the thread is about? Are you asserting that our intelligence services monitored the strictly domestic calls of Trump or his workers?Right backatcha bub. I never said we shouldn't monitor foreign communications. My objection was to political hacks leaking raw data about U.S. citizens.
And there isn't any amount of money that will buy your way out of that.
THEY LEAKED the identity of Flynn and engaged in political assassination via innuendo. It's a shameful police state tactic.
Isn't this what the thread is about? Are you asserting that our intelligence services monitored the strictly domestic calls of Trump or his workers?Right backatcha bub. I never said we shouldn't monitor foreign communications. My objection was to political hacks leaking raw data about U.S. citizens.
And there isn't any amount of money that will buy your way out of that.
THEY LEAKED the identity of Flynn and engaged in political assassination via innuendo. It's a shameful police state tactic.
Hmmm- no this is a shameful police state tactic and attempt at political assassination- no evidence- no support from anyone that it happened- just the usual Trump lying and bullying
View attachment 116036
Accusing the president and his staff of colluding with the Russians to overthrow our election is a police state tactic. The president bugging his political opponents is a police state tactic.Isn't this what the thread is about? Are you asserting that our intelligence services monitored the strictly domestic calls of Trump or his workers?Right backatcha bub. I never said we shouldn't monitor foreign communications. My objection was to political hacks leaking raw data about U.S. citizens.
And there isn't any amount of money that will buy your way out of that.
THEY LEAKED the identity of Flynn and engaged in political assassination via innuendo. It's a shameful police state tactic.
Hmmm- no this is a shameful police state tactic and attempt at political assassination- no evidence- no support from anyone that it happened- just the usual Trump lying and bullying
View attachment 116036
Accusing the president and his staff of colluding with the Russians to overthrow our election is a police state tactic. The president bugging his political opponents is a police state tactic.
Trump associates were speaking with Russians. Anything other than that is a distraction.
Wasn't it the same Russian that was sitting with the democrats at Trumps speech to congress, were is your anger with democrats. And it's not fake news, he is sitting there in full view.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sitting there is just as bad as private meetings and lying about it? Thats a stretch pal.
Do you have confidence the Trump administration and the Republican Congress are competent enough to uncover these lawbreakers and reveal who "THEY" are then prosecute them in court?THEY LEAKED the identity of Flynn and engaged in political assassination via innuendo. It's a shameful police state tactic.
Do you have confidence the Trump administration and the Republican Congress are competent enough to uncover these lawbreakers and reveal who "THEY" are then prosecute them in court?THEY LEAKED the identity of Flynn and engaged in political assassination via innuendo. It's a shameful police state tactic.
No objection here to a Goudy led investigation, but I'm curious why you think he's the only Republican to be trusted with investigating the leak.Do you have confidence the Trump administration and the Republican Congress are competent enough to uncover these lawbreakers and reveal who "THEY" are then prosecute them in court?THEY LEAKED the identity of Flynn and engaged in political assassination via innuendo. It's a shameful police state tactic.
Yes. If Trey Goudy led the investigation, I have no doubt doubt he'd discover what actually happened.
No objection here to a Goudy led investigation, but I'm curious why you think he's the only Republican to be trusted with investigating the leak.Do you have confidence the Trump administration and the Republican Congress are competent enough to uncover these lawbreakers and reveal who "THEY" are then prosecute them in court?THEY LEAKED the identity of Flynn and engaged in political assassination via innuendo. It's a shameful police state tactic.
Yes. If Trey Goudy led the investigation, I have no doubt doubt he'd discover what actually happened.
You didn't, but when you specify Gowdy, and only him, it implies no one else is to be trusted:I don't recall saying only.
I mentioned Goudy because he is a former prosecutor and is sharp as a knife. He's an obvious choice - and is the first one who came to mind.
Trump associates were speaking with Russians. Anything other than that is a distraction.
Wasn't it the same Russian that was sitting with the democrats at Trumps speech to congress, were is your anger with democrats. And it's not fake news, he is sitting there in full view.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sitting there is just as bad as private meetings and lying about it? Thats a stretch pal.
So the same Russian visits the white house 22 times to see Obabble, now you are going to say that's what Presidents do . So isn't that the same thing as other senators do.
Also Clapper has said there surveillance shows no collusion with Russia, but y'all keep blabbering about it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You didn't, but when you specify Gowdy, and only him, it implies no one else is to be trusted:I don't recall saying only.
I mentioned Goudy because he is a former prosecutor and is sharp as a knife. He's an obvious choice - and is the first one who came to mind.
"If Trey Goudy led the investigation, I have no doubt doubt he'd discover what actually happened."
Due to the nature of the subject, he'd have to have the necessary security clearances. Since he's on the Intelligence committee, I suspect he does have both the experience and the clearances to investigate this issue.....if he doesn't already know the answer.
Directory of Representatives · House.gov
Ethics
Intelligence (Permanent)
Oversight and Government
the Judiciary
Trump associates were speaking with Russians. Anything other than that is a distraction.
Wasn't it the same Russian that was sitting with the democrats at Trumps speech to congress, were is your anger with democrats. And it's not fake news, he is sitting there in full view.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sitting there is just as bad as private meetings and lying about it? Thats a stretch pal.
So the same Russian visits the white house 22 times to see Obabble, now you are going to say that's what Presidents do . So isn't that the same thing as other senators do.
Also Clapper has said there surveillance shows no collusion with Russia, but y'all keep blabbering about it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The fact is that there are 2 issues. The first is whether the Russians interfered in our elections. It is clear that the Russians hacked DNC servers and provided WikiLeaks with the information. They also provided false information even forging Senate letterheads. The Russians played Obama for a fool and they knew they could do the same for Trump. There is a web that that ties Trump and many of his advisors to Russia. Trump urged the Russians to release documents from Clinton's servers. Did Trump bring up the alleged wiretapping to divert attention from the investigation into Russia's attempts to influence the elections? The Russians are one of the winners in this mess.
Disagreed about devolving. I asked you questions to better understand your position. If such questions bother you, perhaps you should put me on ignore.You didn't, but when you specify Gowdy, and only him, it implies no one else is to be trusted:I don't recall saying only.
I mentioned Goudy because he is a former prosecutor and is sharp as a knife. He's an obvious choice - and is the first one who came to mind.
"If Trey Goudy led the investigation, I have no doubt doubt he'd discover what actually happened."
Due to the nature of the subject, he'd have to have the necessary security clearances. Since he's on the Intelligence committee, I suspect he does have both the experience and the clearances to investigate this issue.....if he doesn't already know the answer.
Directory of Representatives · House.gov
Ethics
Intelligence (Permanent)
Oversight and Government
the Judiciary
Your argumentative style is devolving. Mentioning someone by name is not the same as saying nobody else is qualified. Jeebus.
