Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think that it is interesting that the peoples who have the most significant cultural obsessions with "racial purity" tend to have the highest percentage of DNA from Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis. My guess is that the aesthetic preoccupation with fine features, slim torso, and long limbs (and these being conflated with notions of racial purity in such cultures) can be traced back to prehistoric cultural shame felt due to the tundra fever that went on.
The assertion that race is only a social construct is known as a "circular argument."
.
The assertion that race is only a social construct is known as a "circular argument." In a circular argument one assumes what one needs to prove.
The different races differ significantly in appearance. They also differ in average intelligence, and rates of crime and illegitimacy. These non cosmetic differences appear throughout the world, and always have. There is no evidence that they decline when social and economic environments become more equal.
Even before DNA evidence became usable a person's race could be determined by the person's skeleton.
Even within a larger racial group, sub races have distinctions. Ashkenazi Jews have average IQs that are as higher as those of white Gentiles of European ancestry as the average IQ's of American Negroes are lower.
For one thousand years Ashkenazi Jews evolved in and near what is now Germany. That is why Yiddish is a combination of Hebrew and German, rather than Hebrew and another European language. Nevertheless, they can be distinguished from European Gentiles by the large number of DNA markers that point to Israel three thousand years ago.
The assertion that race is only a social construct is known as a "circular argument." In a circular argument one assumes what one needs to prove.
The different races differ significantly in appearance. They also differ in average intelligence, and rates of crime and illegitimacy. These non cosmetic differences appear throughout the world, and always have. There is no evidence that they decline when social and economic environments become more equal.
Even before DNA evidence became usable a person's race could be determined by the person's skeleton.
Even within a larger racial group, sub races have distinctions. Ashkenazi Jews have average IQs that are as higher as those of white Gentiles of European ancestry as the average IQ's of American Negroes are lower.
For one thousand years Ashkenazi Jews evolved in and near what is now Germany. That is why Yiddish is a combination of Hebrew and German, rather than Hebrew and another European language. Nevertheless, they can be distinguished from European Gentiles by the large number of DNA markers that point to Israel three thousand years ago.
There is no evidence that they decline when social and economic environments become more equal.
You are wrong about that. Environments have a lot to do with it. Do you elieve me? Want proof?
The assertion that race is only a social construct is known as a "circular argument." In a circular argument one assumes what one needs to prove.
The different races differ significantly in appearance. They also differ in average intelligence, and rates of crime and illegitimacy. These non cosmetic differences appear throughout the world, and always have. There is no evidence that they decline when social and economic environments become more equal.
Even before DNA evidence became usable a person's race could be determined by the person's skeleton.
Even within a larger racial group, sub races have distinctions. Ashkenazi Jews have average IQs that are as higher as those of white Gentiles of European ancestry as the average IQ's of American Negroes are lower.
For one thousand years Ashkenazi Jews evolved in and near what is now Germany. That is why Yiddish is a combination of Hebrew and German, rather than Hebrew and another European language. Nevertheless, they can be distinguished from European Gentiles by the large number of DNA markers that point to Israel three thousand years ago.
There is no evidence that they decline when social and economic environments become more equal.
You are wrong about that. Environments have a lot to do with it. Do you elieve me? Want proof?
http://www.columbia.edu/~rs328/Homicide.pdf
Scroll down to Table 2: Homicide Offending by Race.
Between 1976 to 2005 the black murder rate has fluctuated from 6.3 to 9.5 times the white rate.
http://www.columbia.edu/~rs328/Homicide.pdf
There is no evidence that they decline when social and economic environments become more equal.
You are wrong about that. Environments have a lot to do with it. Do you elieve me? Want proof?
http://www.columbia.edu/~rs328/Homicide.pdf
Scroll down to Table 2: Homicide Offending by Race.
Between 1976 to 2005 the black murder rate has fluctuated from 6.3 to 9.5 times the white rate.
http://www.columbia.edu/~rs328/Homicide.pdf
Yes because of socio/ economic environments.
There is always more crimes in poorer neighborhoods.
http://www.columbia.edu/~rs328/Homicide.pdf
Scroll down to Table 2: Homicide Offending by Race.
Between 1976 to 2005 the black murder rate has fluctuated from 6.3 to 9.5 times the white rate.
http://www.columbia.edu/~rs328/Homicide.pdf
Yes because of socio/ economic environments.
There is always more crimes in poorer neighborhoods.
Black poverty persists because of vast amounts of white tax money spent to help blacks because blacks tend to be quite a bit less intelligent than whites. Nevertheless, neighborhoods full of poor East Asian immigrants are safe to be in after dark. Black neighborhoods are dangerous even during the day. This is because qualities that kept one alive in the African jungle cause one to commit violent felonies in civilized countries.
Yes because of socio/ economic environments.
There is always more crimes in poorer neighborhoods.
Black poverty persists because of vast amounts of white tax money spent to help blacks because blacks tend to be quite a bit less intelligent than whites. Nevertheless, neighborhoods full of poor East Asian immigrants are safe to be in after dark. Black neighborhoods are dangerous even during the day. This is because qualities that kept one alive in the African jungle cause one to commit violent felonies in civilized countries.
I've lived in a lack neighborhood for ten years without a black/white incident.
Did you even bother to read the book I quoted in the op? I doubt it. You probably don't read many books that are written by intelligent people.
Yes because of socio/ economic environments.
There is always more crimes in poorer neighborhoods.
Black poverty persists because of vast amounts of white tax money spent to help blacks because blacks tend to be quite a bit less intelligent than whites. Nevertheless, neighborhoods full of poor East Asian immigrants are safe to be in after dark. Black neighborhoods are dangerous even during the day. This is because qualities that kept one alive in the African jungle cause one to commit violent felonies in civilized countries.
I've lived in a lack neighborhood for ten years without a black/white incident.
Did you even bother to read the book I quoted in the op? I doubt it. You probably don't read many books that are written by intelligent people.
Black poverty persists because of vast amounts of white tax money spent to help blacks because blacks tend to be quite a bit less intelligent than whites. Nevertheless, neighborhoods full of poor East Asian immigrants are safe to be in after dark. Black neighborhoods are dangerous even during the day. This is because qualities that kept one alive in the African jungle cause one to commit violent felonies in civilized countries.
I've lived in a lack neighborhood for ten years without a black/white incident.
Did you even bother to read the book I quoted in the op? I doubt it. You probably don't read many books that are written by intelligent people.
You've been lucky. I used to think that way too until several black criminals nearly murdered me. I glanced through that book. If you read it and understood it, tell me what it says in your own words.
Black poverty persists because of vast amounts of white tax money spent to help blacks because blacks tend to be quite a bit less intelligent than whites. Nevertheless, neighborhoods full of poor East Asian immigrants are safe to be in after dark. Black neighborhoods are dangerous even during the day. This is because qualities that kept one alive in the African jungle cause one to commit violent felonies in civilized countries.
I've lived in a lack neighborhood for ten years without a black/white incident.
Did you even bother to read the book I quoted in the op? I doubt it. You probably don't read many books that are written by intelligent people.
You've been lucky. I used to think that way too until several black criminals nearly murdered me. I glanced through that book. If you read it and understood it, tell me what it says in your own words.
I think that it is interesting that the peoples who have the most significant cultural obsessions with "racial purity" tend to have the highest percentage of DNA from Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis. My guess is that the aesthetic preoccupation with fine features, slim torso, and long limbs (and these being conflated with notions of racial purity in such cultures) can be traced back to prehistoric cultural shame felt due to the tundra fever that went on.
Everyone who is not a Negro has some Neanderthal genes, but the number is very small, and limited to the few genes that had survival value outside of Africa. In the long term inter racial mixing is beneficial, because the good genes last and the bad genes are bred out of the hybrid that is created.
scientifically there are measurably different clusters of people genetically. there are different groups that have similarities of physical features and biological/behavioural functioning.
