The Fallacy of Race

It's an oxymoron.

You almost had me there.

What definition of race are we using, and how is it an oxymoron?

It's a one word oxymoron.:rolleyes:

Repeating that race is an oxymoron does not explain anything. Also, most already have the counting skills to know that "race" is one word. To say that race is a one word oxymoron would imply that there is some kind of contradiction in the definition. What is the definition? What is the contradiction?
 
Those who maintain that race is only a social construct need to define both "race" and "social construct."

Negroes, Caucasians, and Mongoloids can be identified by skeletons and DNA. Within each group further divisions are fairly easy to determine.

The different races have faced different evolutionary pressures for at least ten thousand years. Caucasians have practiced agriculture for at least ten thousand years, and civilization for at least five thousand years. Orientals began agriculture about nine thousand years ago, and civilization about four thousand years ago.

Negroes have only practiced agriculture for about four thousand years. Large numbers of them only began to live in cities during the last century.

Agriculture selects for the ability to plan for the future and to defer gratification. Civilization selects for superior intelligence, and de selects for criminal inclinations.

Urban areas where black live are not known for civilized behavior. The life of a paleolithic hunter was exciting, varied, and violent. It was very similar to the life of a black violent street criminal. Qualities that gave one survival value in the African jungle earn one felony convictions in a civilized country.
 
Those who maintain that race is only a social construct need to define both "race" and "social construct."

Negroes, Caucasians, and Mongoloids can be identified by skeletons and DNA. Within each group further divisions are fairly easy to determine.

The different races have faced different evolutionary pressures for at least ten thousand years. Caucasians have practiced agriculture for at least ten thousand years, and civilization for at least five thousand years. Orientals began agriculture about nine thousand years ago, and civilization about four thousand years ago.

Negroes have only practiced agriculture for about four thousand years. Large numbers of them only began to live in cities during the last century.

Agriculture selects for the ability to plan for the future and to defer gratification. Civilization selects for superior intelligence, and de selects for criminal inclinations.

Urban areas where black live are not known for civilized behavior. The life of a paleolithic hunter was exciting, varied, and violent. It was very similar to the life of a black violent street criminal. Qualities that gave one survival value in the African jungle earn one felony convictions in a civilized country.

Racist propaganda.

The following excerpt is from "Winning Through Enlightenment", by Dr. Ron Smothermon, on racism:

"Let's not mess around. Let's take on a biggy right now. Mankind has played a cruel joke on itself by exercising the ability to adapt skin color to climatic conditions. There are certain areas of the world where the intensity of sun exposure rendens survival difficult for white-skinned people.
Man, the consummate survivor, naturally figured a way around being fried by the sun. Merely disperse the melanin pigment of the skin evenly, and develop a bit more of it, and presto! Automatic protection from the sun.
Nature did this much. The mind of man did the rest. Of course skin color isn't the only physical characteristic humanity uses to divide itself., but it serves admirably to demonstrate a principle. Biologically speaking, there is no "race", except at track meets. Race is a false concept invented by the mind of man for the purpose of dominating and manipulating others. The specific location of "race" within the mind is in that part known as "belief systems". A belief exists that there is a natural division of people. Resting on this belief is a system of justification making it OK to segregate some from others. Further justification makes it OK to think of the other race as naturally inferior or naturally "red-necked", or whatever. Both of these are positions or points of view. So the structure goes like this: the foundation stone is a belief called " 'Race' is a natural condition." This belief supports the justification "There is a natural division of humankind". This gives rise to the point of view called, "They are naturally the way they are". This point of view then makes it possible to prepare people for mistreatment by segregation. At that point, the whole thing surfaces and mistreatment is called "mistreatment". The important thing to realize here is that mistreatment could not occur without
its supporting structure.

This process can easily be applied to other areas of human relationships wherein people are mistreated. And the root of it all is a mind condition, namely, a belief. This belief is so ingrained that for many people there is no such thing as questioning it. It is a perfect example that the mind defines and shapes what we ordinarily think of as reality. None of us are above it. You do it too. Even you.

The truly unfortunate aspect of belief systems is that they tend to provoke equal and opposite belief systems in others. Racism provokes counter-racism. Counter-racism provokes counter-counter-racism, and so on. To be effective, opposition to racism must have as its purpose to expose racists to themselves, not make them wrong. Making them wrong only entrenches them in their condition. You see, people are stuck believing that they are as small as they seem. Making them feel even smaller does not work. I am not speaking only of racism, although this all applies to racism; I am speaking here of principles that transform and enlighten the world.

Underlying even a belief such as " 'race' is a natural condition" is the ground of being that we are the contents of our minds, that there is no way we can ever be more than the sum of our parts. This is the base lie that endarkens the world. You know, you can give up being a racist and you will still be who you are. You will survive. The world will not end. And you can still contribute to it.
After you become responsible about your beliefs about "race" what will be up for you is the world condition. The way you can transform the world in this regard is to get off your racism. This gives others an opportunity to get off their racism.
Treat people as who they are, not who you believe they are. I promise you that they will be transformed in your experience and often in their experience as well.
Finally , I want you to know the ultimate truth about "race" : There is no such thing."
 
Those who maintain that race is only a social construct need to define both "race" and "social construct."

Negroes, Caucasians, and Mongoloids can be identified by skeletons and DNA. Within each group further divisions are fairly easy to determine.

The different races have faced different evolutionary pressures for at least ten thousand years. Caucasians have practiced agriculture for at least ten thousand years, and civilization for at least five thousand years. Orientals began agriculture about nine thousand years ago, and civilization about four thousand years ago.

Negroes have only practiced agriculture for about four thousand years. Large numbers of them only began to live in cities during the last century.

Agriculture selects for the ability to plan for the future and to defer gratification. Civilization selects for superior intelligence, and de selects for criminal inclinations.

Urban areas where black live are not known for civilized behavior. The life of a paleolithic hunter was exciting, varied, and violent. It was very similar to the life of a black violent street criminal. Qualities that gave one survival value in the African jungle earn one felony convictions in a civilized country.

Racist propaganda.

The following excerpt is from "Winning Through Enlightenment", by Dr. Ron Smothermon, on racism:

"Let's not mess around. Let's take on a biggy right now. Mankind has played a cruel joke on itself by exercising the ability to adapt skin color to climatic conditions. There are certain areas of the world where the intensity of sun exposure rendens survival difficult for white-skinned people.
Man, the consummate survivor, naturally figured a way around being fried by the sun. Merely disperse the melanin pigment of the skin evenly, and develop a bit more of it, and presto! Automatic protection from the sun.
Nature did this much. The mind of man did the rest. Of course skin color isn't the only physical characteristic humanity uses to divide itself., but it serves admirably to demonstrate a principle. Biologically speaking, there is no "race", except at track meets. Race is a false concept invented by the mind of man for the purpose of dominating and manipulating others. The specific location of "race" within the mind is in that part known as "belief systems". A belief exists that there is a natural division of people. Resting on this belief is a system of justification making it OK to segregate some from others. Further justification makes it OK to think of the other race as naturally inferior or naturally "red-necked", or whatever. Both of these are positions or points of view. So the structure goes like this: the foundation stone is a belief called " 'Race' is a natural condition." This belief supports the justification "There is a natural division of humankind". This gives rise to the point of view called, "They are naturally the way they are". This point of view then makes it possible to prepare people for mistreatment by segregation. At that point, the whole thing surfaces and mistreatment is called "mistreatment". The important thing to realize here is that mistreatment could not occur without
its supporting structure.

This process can easily be applied to other areas of human relationships wherein people are mistreated. And the root of it all is a mind condition, namely, a belief. This belief is so ingrained that for many people there is no such thing as questioning it. It is a perfect example that the mind defines and shapes what we ordinarily think of as reality. None of us are above it. You do it too. Even you.

The truly unfortunate aspect of belief systems is that they tend to provoke equal and opposite belief systems in others. Racism provokes counter-racism. Counter-racism provokes counter-counter-racism, and so on. To be effective, opposition to racism must have as its purpose to expose racists to themselves, not make them wrong. Making them wrong only entrenches them in their condition. You see, people are stuck believing that they are as small as they seem. Making them feel even smaller does not work. I am not speaking only of racism, although this all applies to racism; I am speaking here of principles that transform and enlighten the world.

Underlying even a belief such as " 'race' is a natural condition" is the ground of being that we are the contents of our minds, that there is no way we can ever be more than the sum of our parts. This is the base lie that endarkens the world. You know, you can give up being a racist and you will still be who you are. You will survive. The world will not end. And you can still contribute to it.
After you become responsible about your beliefs about "race" what will be up for you is the world condition. The way you can transform the world in this regard is to get off your racism. This gives others an opportunity to get off their racism.
Treat people as who they are, not who you believe they are. I promise you that they will be transformed in your experience and often in their experience as well.
Finally , I want you to know the ultimate truth about "race" : There is no such thing."

Just because the concept of race has often been used unjustly throughout history does not mean that different races of humans don't exist. Through most of human history, traveling long distances was a slow and difficult task. As such, various populations were isolated from each other. This isolation resulted in different gene pools and groups of people with different traits. One trait that is often a focus point is that of skin color. Other traits included bone structures and hair color.

Now that travel is much easier and because of decreasing racism, the gene pools are mixing together, especially in countries such as the US. In other countries like China, not so much yet. In the future, different races may no longer exist due to the blending of the no longer isolated gene pools.
 
Last edited:
Those who maintain that race is only a social construct need to define both "race" and "social construct."

Negroes, Caucasians, and Mongoloids can be identified by skeletons and DNA. Within each group further divisions are fairly easy to determine.

The different races have faced different evolutionary pressures for at least ten thousand years. Caucasians have practiced agriculture for at least ten thousand years, and civilization for at least five thousand years. Orientals began agriculture about nine thousand years ago, and civilization about four thousand years ago.

Negroes have only practiced agriculture for about four thousand years. Large numbers of them only began to live in cities during the last century.

Agriculture selects for the ability to plan for the future and to defer gratification. Civilization selects for superior intelligence, and de selects for criminal inclinations.

Urban areas where black live are not known for civilized behavior. The life of a paleolithic hunter was exciting, varied, and violent. It was very similar to the life of a black violent street criminal. Qualities that gave one survival value in the African jungle earn one felony convictions in a civilized country.

Racist propaganda.

QUOTE]

Just because the concept of race has often been used unjustly throughout history does not mean that different races of humans don't exist. Through most of human history, traveling long distances was a slow and difficult task. As such, various populations were isolated from each other. This isolation resulted in different gene pools and groups of people with different traits. One trait that is often a focus point is that of skin color. Other traits included bone structures and hair color.

Now that travel is much easier and because of decreasing racism, the gene pools are mixing together, especially in countries such as the US. In other countries like China, not so much yet. In the future, race may no longer exist due to the blending of the no longer isolated gene pools.

Duh.
 
Race is an excuse used by the less intelligent to mask their shortcomings. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
What definition of race are we using, and how is it an oxymoron?

It's a one word oxymoron.:rolleyes:

Repeating that race is an oxymoron does not explain anything. Also, most already have the counting skills to know that "race" is one word. To say that race is a one word oxymoron would imply that there is some kind of contradiction in the definition. What is the definition? What is the contradiction?
Read "the fallacy of race..." There is no such thing as race. There is only one race, the human race. The word race is believed to included more than one race by many people.

Racists used "The Origin Of the Species" to promote the fallacy of races.

I'll concide that race is a word but can only be used in the singular, imho.
 
Racist propaganda.

The following excerpt is from "Winning Through Enlightenment", by Dr. Ron Smothermon, on racism:

"Let's not mess around. Let's take on a biggy right now. Mankind has played a cruel joke on itself by exercising the ability to adapt skin color to climatic conditions. There are certain areas of the world where the intensity of sun exposure rendens survival difficult for white-skinned people...

etc., etc., etc., blah blah blah.

That blast of hot air, which you did not even compose yourself, did not in any way refute my argument. Race is a useful biological category. The races differ in average ability levels and behavior. Blacks have always been characterized by stupidity, crime, and sexual irresponsibility. This is true wherever they have lived.

Whites would be better off without them. They would be lost without us. They have never created a viable society on their own. They have never been able to maintain one when it was given to them.
 
Read "the fallacy of race..." There is no such thing as race. There is only one race, the human race. The word race is believed to included more than one race by many people.

Racists used "The Origin Of the Species" to promote the fallacy of races.

I'll concide that race is a word but can only be used in the singular, imho.

Secular liberals use the theory of evolution as a way of attacking Protestant Fundamentalists whom they do not like. Then they turn around and ignore the evolutionary implications of books like The Bell Curve.

This is what Charles Darwin had to say about race:

There is, however, no doubt that the various races, when carefully compared and measured, differ much from each other,- as in the texture of the hair, the relative proportions of all parts of the body,* the capacity of the lungs, the form and capacity of the
skull, and even in the convolutions of the brain.*(2) But it would be an endless task to specify the numerous points of difference. The races differ also in constitution, in acclimatisation and in liability to certain diseases. Their mental characteristies are likewise very distinct; chiefly as it would appear in their emotional, but partly in their intellectual faculties.
Charles Darwin - Descent of Man - Chapter 7
 
Exactly. Hitler used this fallacy for evil purposes.

The klan thrived on this bs.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cn0PVk8muFc]Jews must breed with Jews only to keep the chosen race pure or face prison - YouTube[/ame]
 
Race is an excuse used by the less intelligent to mask their shortcomings. Nothing more, nothing less.

Blacks mask their shortcomings by blaming problems caused by those shortcomings on white racism.

Sort of the way Jews blame their problems on anti-semitism when their ratings slip (through no fault of their own of course).
 
Last edited:
Racist propaganda.

The following excerpt is from "Winning Through Enlightenment", by Dr. Ron Smothermon, on racism:

"Let's not mess around. Let's take on a biggy right now. Mankind has played a cruel joke on itself by exercising the ability to adapt skin color to climatic conditions. There are certain areas of the world where the intensity of sun exposure rendens survival difficult for white-skinned people...

etc., etc., etc., blah blah blah.

That blast of hot air, which you did not even compose yourself, did not in any way refute my argument. Race is a useful biological category. The races differ in average ability levels and behavior. Blacks have always been characterized by stupidity, crime, and sexual irresponsibility. This is true wherever they have lived.

Whites would be better off without them. They would be lost without us. They have never created a viable society on their own. They have never been able to maintain one when it was given to them.

Right. The Jews need the "racist" epithet to sling at whitey and to stir up blackey. I mean, how can you call people racist if there is no race?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q90kmUbEv7c]The Jew Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev on how terrible white people are - YouTube[/ame]
 
Racist propaganda.

The following excerpt is from "Winning Through Enlightenment", by Dr. Ron Smothermon, on racism:

"Let's not mess around. Let's take on a biggy right now. Mankind has played a cruel joke on itself by exercising the ability to adapt skin color to climatic conditions. There are certain areas of the world where the intensity of sun exposure rendens survival difficult for white-skinned people...

etc., etc., etc., blah blah blah.

That blast of hot air, which you did not even compose yourself, did not in any way refute my argument. Race is a useful biological category. The races differ in average ability levels and behavior. Blacks have always been characterized by stupidity, crime, and sexual irresponsibility. This is true wherever they have lived.

Whites would be better off without them. They would be lost without us. They have never created a viable society on their own. They have never been able to maintain one when it was given to them.
There would be no rock and roll without them.
 
What's up with Black History Month? Could you imagine the response if someone held a White History Month? :eek:
 

Forum List

Back
Top