Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
It's called AP New and Reuters...News sites you'll never visit.C
Cite?
And no, I don't save every Link for lazy ass commies such as yourself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's called AP New and Reuters...News sites you'll never visit.C
Cite?
He has to prove the documents belong to him. He made the claim; it’s up to him to provide the evidence.Yeah, that was impeachment 1 and 2. Democrats don't need to prove your accusations, he has to prove he's innocent. And you aren't listening.
You are a Democrat, and a Soviet
Cite?
Documents or emails? They aren’t the same.It's called AP New and Reuters...News sites you'll never visit.
And no, I don't save every Link for lazy ass commies such as yourself.
It's obvious you don't follow AP News and Reuters.He has to prove the documents belong to him. He made the claim; it’s up to him to provide the evidence.
I remember emails. You got a cite for documents.You seriously don't remember Hillary taking documents? Wow, just wow. I'll tell you what, document any of your claims and get back to me.
Yeah, we hear his bullshit excuse. The statute explicitly state whether it was "willful" or "intentional" doesn't matter.Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
He has to prove the documents belong to him. He made the claim; it’s up to him to provide the evidence.
Supposedly he did so using the Vulcan Mind Meld...but irrelevant because taking and retaining those national security docs is still illegal once he leaves officeGood thing it was before his term was over then, isn't it Scooby?
Classified Documents.Documents or emails? They aren’t the same.
I remember emails. You got a cite for documents.
What do Reuters and AP have to do with anything? Either he can prove he declassified documents or he can’t.It's obvious you don't follow AP News and Reuters.
The fact is that Trump is not doing what Obama did...send the papers to NARA.
In this respect, Trump is wrong.
? I was talking to Kaz, not sure what you read.You must be willfully blind if you haven't seen the links. But then it's not like you ever bothered to read any of them anyway.
Since you bring up the topic of being dropped on your head, it must be based on your own personal experience.
They are news sites that report on the case and if you read past the headline, you learn that you are wrong in regard to the law.What do Reuters and AP have to do with anything? Either he can prove he declassified documents or he can’t.
Email’s aren’t documents. One is a physical object, while the other is digital ephemera.OMG, you don't know what "documents" means. E-mails ARE documents. I thought you couldn't be any more stupid, and you just blew it away. Fucking amazing
Still no cite, eh? Wouldn’t that take less time than posting the same thing over and over?They are news sites that report on the case and if you read past the headline, you learn that you are wrong in regard to the law.
Are you inferring that you hang out with the FBI and know something I don't know?
A document is the result of a printed digital character.Email’s aren’t documents. One is a physical object, while the other is digital ephemera.
Where are your Links?Still no cite, eh? Wouldn’t that take less time than posting the same thing over and over?
Well this very much was a lie because Trump never declassified those docs. Even if he did, it didn’t give him the right to steal them lolThere's nothing "knee-jerk" about it, asshole. I know from long experience that all prog attacks on Trump are lies.
"He didn't declassify them, but if he did he is stealing them, but if he's not taking them then he's still stealing them . . . . . . yada, yada, yada"Well this very much was a lie because Trump never declassified those docs. Even if he did, it didn’t give him the right to steal them lol