The first same sex incestuous marriage

[Syriusly]

Weren't we assured that gays couldn't be this perverted?

Oklahoma mother, daughter arrested after alleged incestuous marriage

Of course a lesbian is going to fuck her daughter. That's why gays have children. They are perverts.

LOL- just can't help pointing out the rest of the story:

Court records show this isn’t the first time Patricia has married one of her own children.


She also married one of her sons in 2008.

Which according to 'Tipsy' logic means

Of course a heterosexual is going to fuck her son. Thats why heterosexuals have children. They are perverts

. It's amazing how everything the liberal left does now or has always done, is to try and confuse as much as they can in so that they can justify just about any and everything. Your post above is a great example of it, but in reality who do you think is truly buying it ? Not many, yet the numbers will be exaggerated greatly unless I'm living way behind the times these days.

And who is trying to justify anything?

The woman in the OP first married her son- and then her daughter.

I think both are wrong.

The conservative right only got upset about her marrying her daughter.

I think both are wrong.

 

[Indeependent]

Once perversion is accepted as normal, it is all normalized. Once same sex marriage was legalized there are no arguments against incestuous marriages or plural marriages. It doesn't matter whether they are homosexual or heterosexual.

The ol' "slippery slope" argument eh?

Thanks to telecommunications we see a great deal of validity to the "slippery slope" in regards to sexual desires.

 

[Syriusly]

What makes you say this woman is a lesbian?

She had already married one of her sons.

She already married one of her sons? Why didn't the OP pick up on THAT?????

She's bisexual? She certainly has lesbian tendencies which makes her a pervert.

Since time began, a Normal Society has meant men with women and women with men, breeding and furthering Civilisation, as The Bible says go forth and multiply.

A man and a man cannot do this, a woman and a woman cannot do this, unless it's the turkey baster or a surrogate mother, both methods are abnormal and unnatural ways of breeding.

The Agenda is designed to weaken society, by introducing all sorts of abnormal and unnatural practices into the population, which in turn will weaken society.

The Agenda's biggest fear is men and women having more children, but they promote Homosexuals and Lesbians being allowed to bring children into their abnormal environment, either through adoption, turkey basting or surrogate mothers, all three methods should be outlawed.

Normal Society has always been Heterosexual couples parenting children, either through the normal method of breeding or through adoption.

So you think that 'Normal Society' includes a mother marrying her son? Since it would be a heterosexual female marrying a male?

Which fits everything you laid out in your post- and oh and by the way- what this mother did with her son.

The Agenda- of right wing nut jobs like yourself- has always been for government to control people- their reproductive rights, how they can have sex, who they can have sex with- and when they are allowed to have sex.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Once perversion is accepted as normal, it is all normalized. Once same sex marriage was legalized there are no arguments against incestuous marriages or plural marriages. It doesn't matter whether they are homosexual or heterosexual.

The ol' "slippery slope" argument eh?

That's what it is and always has been.

Yes because now we see that they're demanding that men with a penis in drag should be able to use the female bathroom, also there was a thread the other day where they want to put tampon machines in male bathrooms as "men have periods as well"

NO men DON'T have periods as well, if you have a period you are a woman NOT a man, and women do NOT have a penis, if you have penis you are a man.

If you're Transgender and have had a penis sewn onto your anatomy, you're NOT a man, because you still have a womb and ovaries, so genetically you'll always be a woman, but what you are is psychologically unwell.

 

[Syriusly]

Weren't we assured that gays couldn't be this perverted?

Oklahoma mother, daughter arrested after alleged incestuous marriage

Of course a lesbian is going to fuck her daughter. That's why gays have children. They are perverts.

"Of course a lesbian is going to fuck her daughter."

Lesbians can't fuck, to fuck you need man with a dick involved, Lesbians ooh and aah, men and women fuck.

"That's why gays have children. They are perverts."

Homosexuals, Lesbians and Transgenders shouldn't be allowed to have children living with them, because yes they're perverts and most gay men covert a little boys buttocks, they'll say they don't but they do.

Some equally perverted Criminal Psychologists are now saying that Paedophilia is a sexual orientation, like being Heterosexual or Homosexual, they're floating the balloon to see if they can make x amount of the population accept child rapists as just another Lifestyle Choice.

Fascinating...sounds like you've really really thought this out. A lot.

No not thought this out a lot, but I think that we should be educated regarding our enemy, I mean the enemy to Normal Healthy Society.

And by 'normal healthy society' she means society that she approves of......

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

What makes you say this woman is a lesbian?

She had already married one of her sons.

She already married one of her sons? Why didn't the OP pick up on THAT?????

She's bisexual? She certainly has lesbian tendencies which makes her a pervert.

Since time began, a Normal Society has meant men with women and women with men, breeding and furthering Civilisation, as The Bible says go forth and multiply.

A man and a man cannot do this, a woman and a woman cannot do this, unless it's the turkey baster or a surrogate mother, both methods are abnormal and unnatural ways of breeding.

The Agenda is designed to weaken society, by introducing all sorts of abnormal and unnatural practices into the population, which in turn will weaken society.

The Agenda's biggest fear is men and women having more children, but they promote Homosexuals and Lesbians being allowed to bring children into their abnormal environment, either through adoption, turkey basting or surrogate mothers, all three methods should be outlawed.

Normal Society has always been Heterosexual couples parenting children, either through the normal method of breeding or through adoption.

So you think that 'Normal Society' includes a mother marrying her son? Since it would be a heterosexual female marrying a male?

Which fits everything you laid out in your post- and oh and by the way- what this mother did with her son.

The Agenda- of right wing nut jobs like yourself- has always been for government to control people- their reproductive rights, how they can have sex, who they can have sex with- and when they are allowed to have sex.

"So you think that 'Normal Society' includes a mother marrying her son? Since it would be a heterosexual female marrying a male?"

You are an idiot, I spent the first half of this thread condemning that as it's incest.

Go away sugar pants, I offer idiots like you no further response.

Left-Wing nutjobs think men with a penis are women and that men have periods, completely fucked up in the membrane

 

[Silhouette]

And by 'normal healthy society' she means society that she approves of......

No Syriusly, she means a society in which men don't pretend they're women and women don't pretend they're men. And where dudes aren't using each others' assholes as artificial vaginas and women are using dildos claiming "they don't like sex with men".

Insanity is not a quality that any society can embrace. It is wholly unacceptable in the most objective sense.

 

[Pop23]

Weren't we assured that gays couldn't be this perverted?

Oklahoma mother, daughter arrested after alleged incestuous marriage

Of course a lesbian is going to fuck her daughter. That's why gays have children. They are perverts.

LOL- just can't help pointing out the rest of the story:

Court records show this isn’t the first time Patricia has married one of her own children.


She also married one of her sons in 2008.

Which according to 'Tipsy' logic means

Of course a heterosexual is going to fuck her son. Thats why heterosexuals have children. They are perverts

Why is this such a problem to you?

Can you name a single state law that makes sex a requirement of marriage?

 

[Pop23]

Once perversion is accepted as normal, it is all normalized. Once same sex marriage was legalized there are no arguments against incestuous marriages or plural marriages. It doesn't matter whether they are homosexual or heterosexual.

The ol' "slippery slope" argument eh?

WTF: do you not understand that legal marriage DOES NOT REQUIRE SEXUAL CONTACT? Incest is ILLEGAL REGARDLESS OF MARITAL STATUS.

So what rational legal basis is there to deny this to any two people.

 

[Syriusly]

Weren't we assured that gays couldn't be this perverted?

Oklahoma mother, daughter arrested after alleged incestuous marriage

Of course a lesbian is going to fuck her daughter. That's why gays have children. They are perverts.

LOL- just can't help pointing out the rest of the story:

Court records show this isn’t the first time Patricia has married one of her own children.


She also married one of her sons in 2008.

Which according to 'Tipsy' logic means

Of course a heterosexual is going to fuck her son. Thats why heterosexuals have children. They are perverts

Why is this such a problem to you?

Can you name a single state law that makes sex a requirement of marriage?

Why is that such a problem for me?

There is also no legal assumption that a marriage will not include sex.

More importantly though, I have a problem with the issue of undue influence.

Mothers and fathers are in position of authority over their children that could easily- and has been way to often- abused in relationships.

That is the primary reason for the ban on such marriages.

But if you want to go to court to argue for your right to marry your daughter- I support your right to go to court to seek redress.

 

[Syriusly]

And by 'normal healthy society' she means society that she approves of......

No Syriusly, she means .

I think it is pretty clear she means a society that little old ladies get to decide what Americans are allowed to do.

 

[Syriusly]

What makes you say this woman is a lesbian?

She had already married one of her sons.

She already married one of her sons? Why didn't the OP pick up on THAT?????

She's bisexual? She certainly has lesbian tendencies which makes her a pervert.

Since time began, a Normal Society has meant men with women and women with men, breeding and furthering Civilisation, as The Bible says go forth and multiply.

A man and a man cannot do this, a woman and a woman cannot do this, unless it's the turkey baster or a surrogate mother, both methods are abnormal and unnatural ways of breeding.

The Agenda is designed to weaken society, by introducing all sorts of abnormal and unnatural practices into the population, which in turn will weaken society.

The Agenda's biggest fear is men and women having more children, but they promote Homosexuals and Lesbians being allowed to bring children into their abnormal environment, either through adoption, turkey basting or surrogate mothers, all three methods should be outlawed.

Normal Society has always been Heterosexual couples parenting children, either through the normal method of breeding or through adoption.

So you think that 'Normal Society' includes a mother marrying her son? Since it would be a heterosexual female marrying a male?

Which fits everything you laid out in your post- and oh and by the way- what this mother did with her son.

The Agenda- of right wing nut jobs like yourself- has always been for government to control people- their reproductive rights, how they can have sex, who they can have sex with- and when they are allowed to have sex.

"So you think that 'Normal Society' includes a mother marrying her son? Since it would be a heterosexual female marrying a male?"

You are an idiot, I spent the first half of this thread condemning that as it's incest.

Yet you didn't mention that in your post at all.

The Agenda- of right wing nut jobs like yourself- has always been for government to control people- their reproductive rights, how they can have sex, who they can have sex with- and when they are allowed to have sex

 

[ScienceRocks]

If they're adults and consent to it. I don't give a damn.

 

[Pop23]

Once perversion is accepted as normal, it is all normalized. Once same sex marriage was legalized there are no arguments against incestuous marriages or plural marriages. It doesn't matter whether they are homosexual or heterosexual.

Incestuos marriage should be illegal. But, as stated many many times, the marriage law does not require sex as basis for legal marriage, nor does it bestow any right to sexual contact.

Using the 14th amendment as the basis to determine who has the right to marry, I can't see a rational legal basis to deny family members their constitutial right.

I agree, it was not the original intent of marriage laws, but they are what they are.

 

[Picaro]

The psychiatric world WILL weasel ALL forms of abhorrent behavior into a social issue that will eventually have to be looked upon, at first with sympathy, and later, with acceptance.

Exactly. They're wimps who will cave in to political pressure, just as they did in 1973 under threats from the animals for three years, and then of course they had homosexuals inside the APA itself, releasing private info on opponents to the scum. At the vote, some 5,800 voted 'for' claiming them to be a milder form of mentally ill gimps, which in that case merely moved them to a different category of 'less' mentally gimps, and some 3,800 voted against moving them from the original category to the lesser one, and some 10,000 APA members didn't vote at all, like cowards more interested in not being targeted by vermin than genuine professionalism. This was not even remotely about 'science' as the resulting propaganda campaign promptly ran around spouting, and of course the rest of the 'mental health' professions fell to the same pressures.

 

[Pop23]

Weren't we assured that gays couldn't be this perverted?

Oklahoma mother, daughter arrested after alleged incestuous marriage

Of course a lesbian is going to fuck her daughter. That's why gays have children. They are perverts.

LOL- just can't help pointing out the rest of the story:

Court records show this isn’t the first time Patricia has married one of her own children.


She also married one of her sons in 2008.

Which according to 'Tipsy' logic means

Of course a heterosexual is going to fuck her son. Thats why heterosexuals have children. They are perverts

Why is this such a problem to you?

Can you name a single state law that makes sex a requirement of marriage?

Why is that such a problem for me?

There is also no legal assumption that a marriage will not include sex.

More importantly though, I have a problem with the issue of undue influence.

Mothers and fathers are in position of authority over their children that could easily- and has been way to often- abused in relationships.

That is the primary reason for the ban on such marriages.

But if you want to go to court to argue for your right to marry your daughter- I support your right to go to court to seek redress.

Undue influence can occur in relationships of unrelated persons as well.

That's why a legal contract is only legitimate if both parties consent. That consent is not your, or my concern.

You fought this as a 14th amendment right, now you wish denial of that right to others.

You've become quite the bigot.

You understand that Incest can still be illegal, right?

Additionally, a contract is not legal if it is entered into for criminal purpose.

So much for your argument

 

[Picaro]

Once perversion is accepted as normal, it is all normalized. Once same sex marriage was legalized there are no arguments against incestuous marriages or plural marriages. It doesn't matter whether they are homosexual or heterosexual.

The psychiatric world WILL weasel ALL forms of abhorrent behavior into a social issue that will eventually have to be looked upon, at first with sympathy, and later, with acceptance.

Except the plan will fail, look how much opposition there already is to this Perverted Agenda, each day the opposition gets larger, all they have is name calling and less and less people give a crap about what names they're called now.

It would take maybe two weeks to kill their agenda; all it takes is a media reporting the real facts about the degenerates, show a few of those 'Pride' parades in their entirety uncensored along with their other favorite 'pastimes'. We saw this with Prop 8 in California even, a liberal loon state, getting passed. The media can start with their 'movement's' open support for pedoes and kiddie rapers, which began from the beginning also.

 

[Syriusly]

Weren't we assured that gays couldn't be this perverted?

Oklahoma mother, daughter arrested after alleged incestuous marriage

Of course a lesbian is going to fuck her daughter. That's why gays have children. They are perverts.

LOL- just can't help pointing out the rest of the story:

Court records show this isn’t the first time Patricia has married one of her own children.


She also married one of her sons in 2008.

Which according to 'Tipsy' logic means

Of course a heterosexual is going to fuck her son. Thats why heterosexuals have children. They are perverts

Why is this such a problem to you?

Can you name a single state law that makes sex a requirement of marriage?

Why is that such a problem for me?

There is also no legal assumption that a marriage will not include sex.

More importantly though, I have a problem with the issue of undue influence.

Mothers and fathers are in position of authority over their children that could easily- and has been way to often- abused in relationships.

That is the primary reason for the ban on such marriages.

But if you want to go to court to argue for your right to marry your daughter- I support your right to go to court to seek redress.

Undue influence can occur in relationships of unrelated persons as well.

That's why a legal contract is only legitimate if both parties consent. That consent is not your, or my concern.

You fought this as a 14th amendment right, now you wish denial of that right to others.

You've become quite the bigot.

You understand that Incest can still be illegal, right?

So much for your argument

LOL- you think that incest should be legal too? If not you are a bigot- right?

 

[Syriusly]

Once perversion is accepted as normal, it is all normalized. Once same sex marriage was legalized there are no arguments against incestuous marriages or plural marriages. It doesn't matter whether they are homosexual or heterosexual.

The psychiatric world WILL weasel ALL forms of abhorrent behavior into a social issue that will eventually have to be looked upon, at first with sympathy, and later, with acceptance.

Except the plan will fail, look how much opposition there already is to this Perverted Agenda, each day the opposition gets larger, all they have is name calling and less and less people give a crap about what names they're called now.

It would take maybe two weeks to kill their agenda; all it takes is a media reporting the real facts about the degenerates, show a few of those 'Pride' parades in their entirety uncensored along with their other favorite 'pastimes'. We saw this with Prop 8 in California even, a liberal loon state, getting passed.

LOL- meanwhile in reality- Americans now favor same gender marriage more than ever.

It took over 20 years for Americans be as accepting of mixed race marriages after they were legalized.

Changing Attitudes on Gay Marriage

 

[Pop23]

Weren't we assured that gays couldn't be this perverted?

Oklahoma mother, daughter arrested after alleged incestuous marriage

Of course a lesbian is going to fuck her daughter. That's why gays have children. They are perverts.

LOL- just can't help pointing out the rest of the story:

Court records show this isn’t the first time Patricia has married one of her own children.


She also married one of her sons in 2008.

Which according to 'Tipsy' logic means

Of course a heterosexual is going to fuck her son. Thats why heterosexuals have children. They are perverts

Why is this such a problem to you?

Can you name a single state law that makes sex a requirement of marriage?

Why is that such a problem for me?

There is also no legal assumption that a marriage will not include sex.

More importantly though, I have a problem with the issue of undue influence.

Mothers and fathers are in position of authority over their children that could easily- and has been way to often- abused in relationships.

That is the primary reason for the ban on such marriages.

But if you want to go to court to argue for your right to marry your daughter- I support your right to go to court to seek redress.

Undue influence can occur in relationships of unrelated persons as well.

That's why a legal contract is only legitimate if both parties consent. That consent is not your, or my concern.

You fought this as a 14th amendment right, now you wish denial of that right to others.

You've become quite the bigot.

You understand that Incest can still be illegal, right?

So much for your argument

LOL- you think that incest should be legal too? If not you are a bigot- right?

Please supply the quote. I've said many times that incest should remain illegal.

Our government has a duty to keep bloodlines strong.

Your reaching because you can't defend your bigotry.

How fucking cute