Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To even imply that the traitors remotely thought that all men are created equal shows what abdouchebag Mencken is
Slavery apologists like Bri are boring. You see them everywhere, defending their beloved slaver heroes.
Have you heard of free states? By the time Lincoln gave that speech northern states were mostly free states.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
By the time he gave the speech? That's a little late, don't you think? What about when the war started? You can hardly claim that the North was fighting to end slavery when quite a number of states in the union still practiced slavery.
We can debate till the end of time that the north fought to end slavery.......but there is no doubt the south fought to preserve it
So, once again, the Gettysburg Address is a fraud.
So, once again, the Gettysburg Address is a fraud.
Boy, you seriously need some help.
So, once again, the Gettysburg Address is a fraud.
Boy, you seriously need some help.
Why, because I'm not a brainwashed dolt like you?
According to legend Lincoln wrote the speech while on the train to Gettysburg. Today the politicians can't give a speech without a small army of speech writers, psychologists and political analysts. How many memorable speeches were ever given during the 20th century?
To even imply that the traitors remotely thought that all men are created equal shows what abdouchebag Mencken is
It doesn't matter what they thought. The claim that Lincoln and the Northern states were fighting for the right of self-determination is obvious hooey. They were fighting to impose confiscatory tariffs on the Southern states, and nothing more.
To even imply that the traitors remotely thought that all men are created equal shows what abdouchebag Mencken is
It doesn't matter what they thought. The claim that Lincoln and the Northern states were fighting for the right of self-determination is obvious hooey. They were fighting to impose confiscatory tariffs on the Southern states, and nothing more.
Then why did the South unilaterally in their declarations of secession identify maintaining slavery as a primary reason?
CIVIL WAR REVISIONISM..always a good time, eh?
What amazes me is how angry people some still get about the issue of the CSA.
And the same people who get so angry will -- to the man -- tell us that they think slavery is not okay.
It was however, they usually explain to us in one way or the other, a noble act for the CSA to defend the practice of slavery in 1860.
Interesting example of cognitive dissonance, no?
Boy, you seriously need some help.
Why, because I'm not a brainwashed dolt like you?
Because you're an obsessed freak show.
CIVIL WAR REVISIONISM..always a good time, eh?
What amazes me is how angry people some still get about the issue of the CSA.
And the same people who get so angry will -- to the man -- tell us that they think slavery is not okay.
It was however, they usually explain to us in one way or the other, a noble act for the CSA to defend the practice of slavery in 1860.
Interesting example of cognitive dissonance, no?
With many, and bripat9643 in particular, there is no risk of cognitive dissonance; his posts are, however, a discordant and meaningless mixture of 'sounds'.
Today’s essay by Kirkpatrick Sale brilliantly illustrates the “entirely fraudulent” nature of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. The “nation” was not founded in 1776, as Lincoln weirdly asserted, but years later when the Constitution was ratified; it was not founded on the principle of egalitarianism (“all men are created equal”
The great H.L. Mencken recognized this decades ago. The late Joe Sobran also demolished this lie while pointing out that the entire purpose of the existence of such neocon propaganda mills as Harry Jaffa’s Claremont Institute is to perpetuate this Big Lie since it is the “rhetoric of continuing revolution” (a.k.a., the rhetoric of perpetual war for perpetual peace). Most of the rest of Lincoln’s rhetoric about the American founding, about which Sobran thought he knew next to nothing, is properly characterized as a “spectacular absurdity” by Donald Livingston.
It doesn't matter what they thought. The claim that Lincoln and the Northern states were fighting for the right of self-determination is obvious hooey. They were fighting to impose confiscatory tariffs on the Southern states, and nothing more.
Then why did the South unilaterally in their declarations of secession identify maintaining slavery as a primary reason?
People don't want to be associated with horrific crimes or events. They want to believe they are fundamentally good. So they create narratives and myths to whitewash the sins of the past. It's a basic human trait. This is what is happening with those who say the Confederacy didn't leave because of slavery.
To even imply that the traitors remotely thought that all men are created equal shows what abdouchebag Mencken is
It doesn't matter what they thought. The claim that Lincoln and the Northern states were fighting for the right of self-determination is obvious hooey. They were fighting to impose confiscatory tariffs on the Southern states, and nothing more.
Then why did the South unilaterally in their declarations of secession identify maintaining slavery as a primary reason?
It doesn't matter what they thought. The claim that Lincoln and the Northern states were fighting for the right of self-determination is obvious hooey. They were fighting to impose confiscatory tariffs on the Southern states, and nothing more.
Then why did the South unilaterally in their declarations of secession identify maintaining slavery as a primary reason?
It doesn't matter what they put in their declarations of secession. The bottom line is that Lincoln didn't invade the Confederacy to end slavery. He didn't give a damn about the slaves. He was a white supremacist. He invaded the Confederacy to impose the Morill tariff on the South. He said so himself.
I realize upsetting your comfortable version of history is causing you severe distress.
Then why did the South unilaterally in their declarations of secession identify maintaining slavery as a primary reason?
People don't want to be associated with horrific crimes or events. They want to believe they are fundamentally good. So they create narratives and myths to whitewash the sins of the past. It's a basic human trait. This is what is happening with those who say the Confederacy didn't leave because of slavery.
No one says that, numskull.
Another thing people do when they want to ignore horrific crimes and events is makeup bogus history. They want to believe they are fundamentally good. Hence, the reason Lincoln has been made into a virtual deity when in reality he is one of the greatest tyrants of history.
