Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Oh my god, what does the term "liberal left" mean to you? You aren't fit to polish Mr. West's boots.
Pogo is FAR too busy polishing George Soros knob to do so anyway....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh my god, what does the term "liberal left" mean to you? You aren't fit to polish Mr. West's boots.
"Hands up, don't shoot".This is disgusting, but not surprising. If you're black you better tow the leftist agenda. Democrats used sheets to hide behind in the old days. Now they use social media.
What the left just did to this 12-year-old is REPULSIVE - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com
Doesn't say a damn word about "Democrats", "Republicans" or any kind of voter at all. Moreover this bogus Exhuminer story has already been posted (and shot down).
Are you a moron? Allen West surely is.
Who shot it down? The evidence please.
I did, among others.
It's the same bullshit as here --- one Twit comes in and somehow one Twit morphs into "the entire left". THREE TIMES I posted "Composition Fallacy" in this thread alone. Try looking it the fuck up.
ROFLMNAO!
I never tire of watching the Left trot out the latest 'fallacy' that they erroneously feel that they've learned.
Suffice it to say that there is no fallacy of composition, where the argument shows that the composition is as the argument cites.
Just as there is no fallacy of a slippery slope, where the argument demonstrates the slope and it's slippery nature, and just as there is no fallacy in the attacking of the individual where the argument IS the individual... and no fallacy of appeal to authority where the argument demonstrates the legitimacy of authority and the relevance of such to the argument.
But hey!
In fairness to the Relativists... they're incapable of objective reason, therefore there is NO WAY they could ever actually "KNOW" that.
You have a single Twit reported, Dumbass. A single hearsay report, undocumented, which is by definition via (anti)"social media", which is an intrinsically volatile flame medium anyway. And then you have a 12-year-old claiming threats --- which are also undocumented.
And from this you want to not only pretend (anti)social media is a legitimate source, but extend these hearsay claiims to "the entire left", or "the liberal left", whatever the fuck that is.
Based on a single Twit we can't see, posted by an anonymous gadfly none of us knows.
Fucking knuckledragging shit-for-brains morons.....
You wont believe what happens next!
Allen West is getting desperate for clicks
OH! Now THAT is a lovely means to concede.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
In a world where losers raise their own hand in Victory stood the ultimate loser. YOU
You wont believe what happens next!
Allen West is getting desperate for clicks
OH! Now THAT is a lovely means to concede.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
In a world where losers raise their own hand in Victory stood the ultimate loser. YOU
Yes... and I'm sure that is quite a place. And what a shame we can't all go inside your little noggin and party for a while. I mean by all outward appearances it is a humungous empty space.
The ECHO ALONE would be hysterical.
"Hands up, don't shoot".Doesn't say a damn word about "Democrats", "Republicans" or any kind of voter at all. Moreover this bogus Exhuminer story has already been posted (and shot down).
Are you a moron? Allen West surely is.
Who shot it down? The evidence please.
I did, among others.
It's the same bullshit as here --- one Twit comes in and somehow one Twit morphs into "the entire left". THREE TIMES I posted "Composition Fallacy" in this thread alone. Try looking it the fuck up.
ROFLMNAO!
I never tire of watching the Left trot out the latest 'fallacy' that they erroneously feel that they've learned.
Suffice it to say that there is no fallacy of composition, where the argument shows that the composition is as the argument cites.
Just as there is no fallacy of a slippery slope, where the argument demonstrates the slope and it's slippery nature, and just as there is no fallacy in the attacking of the individual where the argument IS the individual... and no fallacy of appeal to authority where the argument demonstrates the legitimacy of authority and the relevance of such to the argument.
But hey!
In fairness to the Relativists... they're incapable of objective reason, therefore there is NO WAY they could ever actually "KNOW" that.
You have a single Twit reported, Dumbass. A single hearsay report, undocumented, which is by definition via (anti)"social media", which is an intrinsically volatile flame medium anyway. And then you have a 12-year-old claiming threats --- which are also undocumented.
And from this you want to not only pretend (anti)social media is a legitimate source, but extend these hearsay claiims to "the entire left", or "the liberal left", whatever the fuck that is.
Based on a single Twit we can't see, posted by an anonymous gadfly none of us knows.
Fucking knuckledragging shit-for-brains morons.....
You wont believe what happens next!
Allen West is getting desperate for clicks
OH! Now THAT is a lovely means to concede.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
In a world where losers raise their own hand in Victory stood the ultimate loser. YOU
Yes... and I'm sure that is quite a place. And what a shame we can't all go inside your little noggin and party for a while. I mean by all outward appearances it is a humungous empty space.
The ECHO ALONE would be hysterical.
Outward appearances?
This is the internet goofy
"Hands up, don't shoot" was a lie that tge leftist propaganda parrots spread throughout the nation. That's you."Hands up, don't shoot".Who shot it down? The evidence please.
I did, among others.
It's the same bullshit as here --- one Twit comes in and somehow one Twit morphs into "the entire left". THREE TIMES I posted "Composition Fallacy" in this thread alone. Try looking it the fuck up.
ROFLMNAO!
I never tire of watching the Left trot out the latest 'fallacy' that they erroneously feel that they've learned.
Suffice it to say that there is no fallacy of composition, where the argument shows that the composition is as the argument cites.
Just as there is no fallacy of a slippery slope, where the argument demonstrates the slope and it's slippery nature, and just as there is no fallacy in the attacking of the individual where the argument IS the individual... and no fallacy of appeal to authority where the argument demonstrates the legitimacy of authority and the relevance of such to the argument.
But hey!
In fairness to the Relativists... they're incapable of objective reason, therefore there is NO WAY they could ever actually "KNOW" that.
You have a single Twit reported, Dumbass. A single hearsay report, undocumented, which is by definition via (anti)"social media", which is an intrinsically volatile flame medium anyway. And then you have a 12-year-old claiming threats --- which are also undocumented.
And from this you want to not only pretend (anti)social media is a legitimate source, but extend these hearsay claiims to "the entire left", or "the liberal left", whatever the fuck that is.
Based on a single Twit we can't see, posted by an anonymous gadfly none of us knows.
Fucking knuckledragging shit-for-brains morons.....
What the fuck is that supposed to mean, stupid?
Here's an example of Composition Fallacy, for you morons:
"David Duke is with the KKK.
David Duke is a Republican.
Therefore, Republicans are with the KKK".
There's a reason I told you to look it up.
"Hands up, don't shoot" was a lie that tge leftist propaganda parrots spread throughout the nation. That's you."Hands up, don't shoot".I did, among others.
It's the same bullshit as here --- one Twit comes in and somehow one Twit morphs into "the entire left". THREE TIMES I posted "Composition Fallacy" in this thread alone. Try looking it the fuck up.
ROFLMNAO!
I never tire of watching the Left trot out the latest 'fallacy' that they erroneously feel that they've learned.
Suffice it to say that there is no fallacy of composition, where the argument shows that the composition is as the argument cites.
Just as there is no fallacy of a slippery slope, where the argument demonstrates the slope and it's slippery nature, and just as there is no fallacy in the attacking of the individual where the argument IS the individual... and no fallacy of appeal to authority where the argument demonstrates the legitimacy of authority and the relevance of such to the argument.
But hey!
In fairness to the Relativists... they're incapable of objective reason, therefore there is NO WAY they could ever actually "KNOW" that.
You have a single Twit reported, Dumbass. A single hearsay report, undocumented, which is by definition via (anti)"social media", which is an intrinsically volatile flame medium anyway. And then you have a 12-year-old claiming threats --- which are also undocumented.
And from this you want to not only pretend (anti)social media is a legitimate source, but extend these hearsay claiims to "the entire left", or "the liberal left", whatever the fuck that is.
Based on a single Twit we can't see, posted by an anonymous gadfly none of us knows.
Fucking knuckledragging shit-for-brains morons.....
What the fuck is that supposed to mean, stupid?
Here's an example of Composition Fallacy, for you morons:
"David Duke is with the KKK.
David Duke is a Republican.
Therefore, Republicans are with the KKK".
There's a reason I told you to look it up.
"Hands up, don't shoot" was a lie that tge leftist propaganda parrots spread throughout the nation. That's you."Hands up, don't shoot".ROFLMNAO!
I never tire of watching the Left trot out the latest 'fallacy' that they erroneously feel that they've learned.
Suffice it to say that there is no fallacy of composition, where the argument shows that the composition is as the argument cites.
Just as there is no fallacy of a slippery slope, where the argument demonstrates the slope and it's slippery nature, and just as there is no fallacy in the attacking of the individual where the argument IS the individual... and no fallacy of appeal to authority where the argument demonstrates the legitimacy of authority and the relevance of such to the argument.
But hey!
In fairness to the Relativists... they're incapable of objective reason, therefore there is NO WAY they could ever actually "KNOW" that.
You have a single Twit reported, Dumbass. A single hearsay report, undocumented, which is by definition via (anti)"social media", which is an intrinsically volatile flame medium anyway. And then you have a 12-year-old claiming threats --- which are also undocumented.
And from this you want to not only pretend (anti)social media is a legitimate source, but extend these hearsay claiims to "the entire left", or "the liberal left", whatever the fuck that is.
Based on a single Twit we can't see, posted by an anonymous gadfly none of us knows.
Fucking knuckledragging shit-for-brains morons.....
What the fuck is that supposed to mean, stupid?
Here's an example of Composition Fallacy, for you morons:
"David Duke is with the KKK.
David Duke is a Republican.
Therefore, Republicans are with the KKK".
There's a reason I told you to look it up.
I don't know the quote, means nothing to me.
It's worded as a request. A request cannot be a "lie". Are you like new to English or something?
"Hands up, don't shoot" was a lie that tge leftist propaganda parrots spread throughout the nation. That's you."Hands up, don't shoot".You have a single Twit reported, Dumbass. A single hearsay report, undocumented, which is by definition via (anti)"social media", which is an intrinsically volatile flame medium anyway. And then you have a 12-year-old claiming threats --- which are also undocumented.
And from this you want to not only pretend (anti)social media is a legitimate source, but extend these hearsay claiims to "the entire left", or "the liberal left", whatever the fuck that is.
Based on a single Twit we can't see, posted by an anonymous gadfly none of us knows.
Fucking knuckledragging shit-for-brains morons.....
What the fuck is that supposed to mean, stupid?
Here's an example of Composition Fallacy, for you morons:
"David Duke is with the KKK.
David Duke is a Republican.
Therefore, Republicans are with the KKK".
There's a reason I told you to look it up.
I don't know the quote, means nothing to me.
It's worded as a request. A request cannot be a "lie". Are you like new to English or something?
Oh, this is the part where you play dumb, huh.
Oh, this is the part where you play dumb, huh.
We really need to split this country. Not necessarily north and south but conservative and liberal.
Let each state vote on their affiliation and let the cards fall where they may.
This is disgusting, but not surprising. If you're black you better tow the leftist agenda. Democrats used sheets to hide behind in the old days. Now they use social media.
What the left just did to this 12-year-old is REPULSIVE - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com
Doesn't say a damn word about "Democrats", "Republicans" or any kind of voter at all. Moreover this bogus Exhuminer story has already been posted (and shot down).
Are you a moron? Allen West surely is.
Who shot it down? The evidence please.
I did, among others.
"Hands up, don't shoot" was a lie that tge leftist propaganda parrots spread throughout the nation. That's you."Hands up, don't shoot".You have a single Twit reported, Dumbass. A single hearsay report, undocumented, which is by definition via (anti)"social media", which is an intrinsically volatile flame medium anyway. And then you have a 12-year-old claiming threats --- which are also undocumented.
And from this you want to not only pretend (anti)social media is a legitimate source, but extend these hearsay claiims to "the entire left", or "the liberal left", whatever the fuck that is.
Based on a single Twit we can't see, posted by an anonymous gadfly none of us knows.
Fucking knuckledragging shit-for-brains morons.....
What the fuck is that supposed to mean, stupid?
Here's an example of Composition Fallacy, for you morons:
"David Duke is with the KKK.
David Duke is a Republican.
Therefore, Republicans are with the KKK".
There's a reason I told you to look it up.
I don't know the quote, means nothing to me.
It's worded as a request. A request cannot be a "lie". Are you like new to English or something?
Oh, this is the part where you play dumb, huh.
Here's more for you to digest."Hands up, don't shoot" was a lie that tge leftist propaganda parrots spread throughout the nation. That's you."Hands up, don't shoot".
What the fuck is that supposed to mean, stupid?
Here's an example of Composition Fallacy, for you morons:
"David Duke is with the KKK.
David Duke is a Republican.
Therefore, Republicans are with the KKK".
There's a reason I told you to look it up.
I don't know the quote, means nothing to me.
It's worded as a request. A request cannot be a "lie". Are you like new to English or something?
Oh, this is the part where you play dumb, huh.
How can a request be a "lie" then?
Fucking idiot.