Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Except your thread title and first two, leading sentences are filled with comment/reference to "global warming" so you aren't making clear what you think the topic is.
We must conquer nature. And then work with it. Massive building of structures on barrier islands and flood zones are made to look like global warming to the general population. Some cities have built structures to the ocean to get every view a person can get. Moving structures back at least a block on barrier islands is common sense if the ocean is slowly encroaching. Instead, we are still building on every square inch we can.
Sunak is a Tory? I thought he worked for the WEF
Your reasoning is a bit confused
You start off ok by saying that we should not be fighting man-made global warming since its not the cause of rising temps
But then you say we should do it anyway just for the heck of it
WTF are you kidding me????
Thread title: The Impact of Global warming policies.
"GLOBAL WARMING" is THE topic of this thread!!!!
The pseudo-religious belief that Humans are RESPONSIBLE for ANY climate change is a giant CROCK OF BULLSHIT!!!!!
It is unprovable FAITH BASED supposition.
It is a HUGE fucking SCAM started in 1988 but Michael Mann and AL Gore, Et AL!
How fucking primitive! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!!!
Might as well go FULL AZTEC and offer Human sacrifice to appease the weather gods!
The policies are just as much BULLSHIT as are the "reasons" for them!"policies" is also in the thread.
It's not about "global warming", it's about "global warming policies", think about it. THINK THE FUCK ABOUT IT.
It's like you see a thread called "blue tits" and you think it's a porn thread because "it got 'tits' in the title"
REALLY? Is that the level you're working on?
Clearly you didn't read any of what I wrote to figure out what the fuck this conversation is about.
You claim that forcing landlords to spend a lot of money retrofitting homes to be more energy efficient will save the renters money.No.
I start off by talking about global warming. Global warming happened 100,000 something years ago, 200,000 something years ago, 300,000 something years ago. It's natural. It happens.
The debate, the fight, is whether it's man made or not. This is a fact. People are doing this. They're debating whether it's one or the other. I guess some people might think it's not happening, just their balls got caught in the heater or something.... or they have Alzheimer's and don't remember last year.
Then I say "Either way..." and talk about what governments are doing. More facts.
Then I show an example of one of these policies. Then I provide a link. Then I talk about how this policy has a beneficial impact for some people, especially people who don't own their own home yet.
I mean, if people find this confusing, really, what elementary school do they go to? Or did they get kicked out before graduating elementary school? Reading a whole post before commenting isn't that hard, is it? (seems it is. ).
You claim that forcing landlords to spend a lot of money retrofitting homes to be more energy efficient will save the renters money is not supportable since their rent will go up
I get the schizophrenic the retort. Unfortunately, the ones who have the real power diminish the peasant in all ways.Still not the topic of conversation. Try reading what I wrote. It's simple. Well, I thought it would be simple, but it seems writing "global warming" is like have a Communist flag up for a bull, the bull's like "shit, bull fighting time" and the Communist is like "no, it's just a Communist flag, what do you think of Communism" and the bull's like "get my horn right if his fucking crotch."
Meaning existing owners will sell the homes to buyers who are exempt from the expensive new mandates?Actually what will happen is that people will sell their houses. This will reduce house prices, making them more accessible to people who can't buy their own homes. They buy, there are less renters, so those people buy their own homes will have more money.
Meaning existing owners will sell the homes to buyers who are exempt from the expensive new mandates?
Of course not
Rents must go up to pay for the renovations
House prices are not going downOr maybe rents will even go down. But the point was about home buyers. I didn't say everyone would benefit from this. That house prices go down is a great start.
My opinion is this;So, global warming, it seems to be happening, the debate is whether it's man made or not.
Either way, governments are putting in policies in order to try and deal with "man made global warming" whether it's a thing or not.
Here's the British government forcing landlords to have an efficiency rating for their homes of "C or above".
Thousands of landlords sell up to avoid net zero rules as buy-to-let no longer ‘viable’
Thousands of landlords are selling up ahead of Government net zero rules which will force them to make costly energy efficiency improvements. More than 65,000 rental properties went up for sale in the first three months of the year, new instruction data from estate agents showed. Of these some...uk.yahoo.com
The impact is that thousands of landlords prefer to sell these houses rather than spend loads of money to make these homes better.
The result could be that house prices fall, which is something that's in desperate need in the UK, it could also result in poor people not having to spend so much heating their rented homes, potentially saving them money in the long term.
I don't agree that we should be fighting "man made global warming", I do believe that we should be trying to be as efficient as possible, to live with as small a footprint on this planet as possible, because the planet is our home and people tend to want to keep their homes clean and livable.
Which part are you having difficulty with?Er... what?
My opinion is this;
1. Global warming is real. It is undeniable that world temps are rising
2. Man is probably responsible for at least a small part of it, maybe even a big part
3. It's stupid to think we can reverse it and it is stupid to spend trillions of dollars trying to fight it. The only real reasonable thing to do about it is to adapt.
WATCH: Kennedy stumps Biden official on $50 trillion cost to fight climate change: 'You don't know, do you?'
Republican Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy stumped a Biden administration official over the benefits of the $50 trillion price tag to make the U.S. carbon-neutral.
Which part are you having difficulty with?
House prices are not going down
You might hope that the selling price of rental property will fall by the amount of what the mandates will cost
But even that is doubtful
And even that will involve considerable loss for existing landloards
The thread title is the impact of global warming policies. My post was about Climate Change, AKA, global warming.That's your opinion, and it doesn't respond to the topic. Perhaps you'd also like to give me your opinion on cats playing in the NFL, that'll be just as off topic as what you've written.
Great, go look it up, quit being ignorant.ALL OF IT.
