Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.
Without getting into the weeds, this hypothesis has a special connotation for our timeline. Specifically, if one would travel backwards in time, that one would never reach a "boundary". I.E., for anyone in our universe, time has NO beginning. You could travel backwards in time forever and never reach the beginning.
To someone outside our universe looking in, time would appear to have a beginning.
While this hypothesis may or may not be true, it clearly undermines the allegedly "incontrovertible" mathematical arguments put forth in this thread, per the thread title.
"Incontrovertible", they are not.
One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.
Without getting into the weeds, this hypothesis has a special connotation for our timeline. Specifically, if one would travel backwards in time, that one would never reach a "boundary". I.E., for anyone in our universe, time has NO beginning. You could travel backwards in time forever and never reach the beginning.
To someone outside our universe looking in, time would appear to have a beginning.
While this hypothesis may or may not be true, it clearly undermines the allegedly "incontrovertible" mathematical arguments put forth in this thread, per the thread title.
"Incontrovertible", they are not.
>>One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.<<
Sounds like a fairy tale.
The lengths the atheists/ags will go to to discredit God, science, math, logic, and rhetoric is unbelieveable.
Jesus arose, which goes far beyond anything any other supposed "gods" ever accomplished. And there is plenty of evidence Jesus existed in a particular place at a particular time and that HIS life was even prophesied a millennium and hundreds of years before HE was even born.One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.
Without getting into the weeds, this hypothesis has a special connotation for our timeline. Specifically, if one would travel backwards in time, that one would never reach a "boundary". I.E., for anyone in our universe, time has NO beginning. You could travel backwards in time forever and never reach the beginning.
To someone outside our universe looking in, time would appear to have a beginning.
While this hypothesis may or may not be true, it clearly undermines the allegedly "incontrovertible" mathematical arguments put forth in this thread, per the thread title.
"Incontrovertible", they are not.
>>One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.<<
Sounds like a fairy tale.
The lengths the atheists/ags will go to to discredit God, science, math, logic, and rhetoric is unbelieveable.
So then, tell us about the science, math, logic that support your gods. This thread has been among countless claiming ''incontrovertible evidence'' of various gods yet they all have suffered from the same failings; no evidence.
The resurrection story was plagiarized from other religions before it. And Tom Brady just won his first Super Bowl.! No other QB has ever done this!Jesus arose, which goes far beyond anything any other supposed "gods" ever accomplished.
One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.
Without getting into the weeds, this hypothesis has a special connotation for our timeline. Specifically, if one would travel backwards in time, that one would never reach a "boundary". I.E., for anyone in our universe, time has NO beginning. You could travel backwards in time forever and never reach the beginning.
To someone outside our universe looking in, time would appear to have a beginning.
While this hypothesis may or may not be true, it clearly undermines the allegedly "incontrovertible" mathematical arguments put forth in this thread, per the thread title.
"Incontrovertible", they are not.
>>One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.<<
Sounds like a fairy tale.
The lengths the atheists/ags will go to to discredit God, science, math, logic, and rhetoric is unbelieveable.
So then, tell us about the science, math, logic that support your gods. This thread has been among countless claiming ''incontrovertible evidence'' of various gods yet they all have suffered from the same failings; no evidence.
Can you prove that?pay attention ... there exists infinite directions a force vector can point ... nature ...
Simple closure proves continuity ... read the first few pages of your old calculus textbook ... we can split the difference forever ...
.I somehow missed the science, math, and logic that supports the Christian Gods. Could you point me to the post that lays out the science supporting your gods? I’ll take a look at the science part supporting your gods and circle back™ to the math part.One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.
Without getting into the weeds, this hypothesis has a special connotation for our timeline. Specifically, if one would travel backwards in time, that one would never reach a "boundary". I.E., for anyone in our universe, time has NO beginning. You could travel backwards in time forever and never reach the beginning.
To someone outside our universe looking in, time would appear to have a beginning.
While this hypothesis may or may not be true, it clearly undermines the allegedly "incontrovertible" mathematical arguments put forth in this thread, per the thread title.
"Incontrovertible", they are not.
>>One hypothesis about the beginning of time in our universe is that time "unfurled"with space itself prior to the Big Bang. This hypothesis has theoretical support and consistent mathematics.<<
Sounds like a fairy tale.
The lengths the atheists/ags will go to to discredit God, science, math, logic, and rhetoric is unbelieveable.
So then, tell us about the science, math, logic that support your gods. This thread has been among countless claiming ''incontrovertible evidence'' of various gods yet they all have suffered from the same failings; no evidence.
The science, math, and logic that supports the Christian God has been provided in this thread or did you miss that like all the others? We also found out what is gonna happen to abu afak . Same as Walter M. Fitch.
Just as I thought. You can't. It's because of the laws of physics. You have been caught in a lie or are wrong. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you were wrong
The post number or numbers for the science?
), #48, etc. The rest of the questions are answered in the Bible.
Just as I thought. You can't. It's because of the laws of physics. You have been caught in a lie or are wrong. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you were wrong
Do you know what closure is? ... didn't think so ...
.
hahahhahahahahahahh
......same old shit--we've been over this a million times:
YOU have to prove your claim--I don't have to refute anything until it is proven.....this is basic common sense--like a court--the court has to prove guilt--not the other way around
I saw posts you identified. There is no science of math pointing to any gods.The post number or numbers for the science?
See the OP, #11, (one of the dumbest af posts I've ever read #15; just point it out for
I have a question not answered in the Bibles. Why are there vestigial structures in humans and other animals?
You don't have it nor infinity in the universe. Everything is finite in nature. Physics proves it is, but you either cannot admit it or are wrong
You don't have it nor infinity in the universe. Everything is finite in nature. Physics proves it is, but you either cannot admit it or are wrong
Physics relies on closure ... go ahead and learn what that means ... you seem ignorant of basic smoothness tests ...
So you admitted you were wrong about infinity in nature and now want to change the subject. Go ahead an explain how "physics relies on closure," so we can understand what you are trying to say. It's one of those subjects I don't want to explain.
So you admitted you were wrong about infinity in nature and now want to change the subject. Go ahead an explain how "physics relies on closure," so we can understand what you are trying to say. It's one of those subjects I don't want to explain.
Do you understand that directions are closed ... between any two different directions, there exists yet a third direction? ... it doesn't matter how close the directions are, there will always be another direction in between? ... without exception ...
Thus ... we can say there are an infinite amount of force vectors between any two other force vectors ... all of which exist in nature ... the same is true for time intervals, velocities, stress tensors, torques ... there's a few exceptions, but not that many ...
I see. You made a statement not understanding that you might be tasked with supporting said statement so you’re left to drop ten, drop another ten and skedaddle.I have a question not answered in the Bibles. Why are there vestigial structures in humans and other animals?
You should start this as a separate thread. Name a few and why you think they are useless. Is it based on fake evolution?
Oh, I thought you were going to present something new. Instead, it's just the same argument that was disproved. Our universe is closed, so we cannot have more than what was there to begin with. The physics laws of conservation of energy proves it. Thus, your directions of any force vector is limited by SLOT. Look it up and learn.
Oh, I thought you were going to present something new. Instead, it's just the same argument that was disproved. Our universe is closed, so we cannot have more than what was there to begin with. The physics laws of conservation of energy proves it. Thus, your directions of any force vector is limited by SLOT. Look it up and learn.
Please post a citation from a credible scientific source ... or you're lying ... my citation comes from the first few pages of any calculus textbook ...
And learn what closed means ... obviously you're clueless as to this ... direction is not quantized, it's smooth ...
