BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,603
- 2,180
Nope, since the deal stated that Iran can never produce a weapon,
Being a fucking liar is no way to win an argument, Blindfool
From the Amazon.Com Post
{
Sanctions lifted. Restrictions gone. Nuclear development legitimized. Iran would reenter the international community, as Obama suggested in an interview in December, as “a very successful regional power.” A few years — probably around 10 — of good behavior and Iran would be home free.
The agreement thus would provide a predictable path to an Iranian bomb. Indeed, a flourishing path, with trade resumed, oil pumping and foreign investment pouring into a restored economy.
Meanwhile, Iran’s intercontinental ballistic missile program is subject to no restrictions at all. It’s not even part of these negotiations.}
The fatal flaw in the Iran deal
by withdrawing from it, President "DumbasDirt" has opened the door for them to develop one. However, the other permanent members of the UNSC have pledged to continue to uphold the plan.
Donnie Dangerously's plan is to drive a wedge between the USA and our allies all over the world.
Or should we call it Putin's plan.
Speaking of "dumbasdirt" did you grasp the sunset clause little gay Barry built into his treason?
You've always been such a cupcake. Charles is big on words to rile the base with but, very little facts appear in his opinion piece
Page 3.
Full text of the Iran nuclear deal
Are you blatantly lying there is no sunset clause?
Even for you, that's some SHAMELESS lying...
No one is lying. Except those that say the sunset clauses on their enrichment programs allow them to build an atomic weapon.