🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The killer did not use an AR-15...he used a Sig....

Good point, now what's your point? Someone misidentified the gun and that's important. Why?

Because your filthy party keeps trying to ban the AR-15.

Communists can't seem to grasp that whole "shall not infringe" thingy.

The AR 15 kills people doesn't it? Not sure why this time it wasn't this gun is important. When misidentified did people become unshot?
The AR 15 doesn't kill people, no.
 
You said they didn't exist.
Notice, you were not called a liar and there was no reference to your intelligence level.






Well well. Look at that, if you have enough money you can have anything you want gun wise. How interesting then that the one percent, of the one percent is pushing gun control to disarm the rest of us so that we will no longer be on the same level as them. When gun control is passed only the criminals and the wealthy will have guns. And then the rich will truly be able to enslave you.
?.
Unclear what this means.
Unclear why this is associated with the quoted post.

What do France's firearm laws have to do with the o.p.?

The 2nd amendment comes from a history unique to America. It was provided by the writers of the Constitution in a context well known to them. The Bill of Rights codified what they believed true and necessary.

Today, people may purchase either of the weapons mentioned in the o.p. The purchase is from desire to own the weapon, not the need for that specific weapon.
 
You said they didn't exist.
Notice, you were not called a liar and there was no reference to your intelligence level.






Well well. Look at that, if you have enough money you can have anything you want gun wise. How interesting then that the one percent, of the one percent is pushing gun control to disarm the rest of us so that we will no longer be on the same level as them. When gun control is passed only the criminals and the wealthy will have guns. And then the rich will truly be able to enslave you.
?.
Unclear what this means.
Unclear why this is associated with the quoted post.

What do France's firearm laws have to do with the o.p.?

The 2nd amendment comes from a history unique to America. It was provided by the writers of the Constitution in a context well known to them. The Bill of Rights codified what they believed true and necessary.

Today, people may purchase either of the weapons mentioned in the o.p. The purchase is from desire to own the weapon, not the need for that specific weapon.





Color me unsurprised that you feign ignorance. The French laws pertain to the OP because they are the exact laws that wish to see enacted here. They failed in France. They will fail here because it isn't the guns that are the problem.
 
So? Are you saying because it wasn't used here then it's a non killing type of gun?

You can be killed with a shovel.

What rational people are saying is that the AR-15 is no more dangerous than any other .22

So? Is someone saying you can't be harmed by either?

Are you next going to start a thread about other mistakes. Like calling a Walrus a Sea lion? And pretending that's an important thing when talking about people dying?
 
The AR 15 kills people doesn't it?

Mine never has. Must be defective. :dunno:

Not sure why this time it wasn't this gun is important. When misidentified did people become unshot?

Because you Communists want to claim that an inanimate object, the gun, is responsible for the acts of a Muslim terrorist (and registered democrat,)
 
Before the bodies hit the floor in Orlando, the anti-liberty left was scrambling to climb atop the corpses and attack civil rights.

Nothing that the left and the DNC media like more than attacking the AR-15 style of .22 that is so popular with Americans. Obama and Hillary demanded that the Bill of Rights be revoked,. Clinton renews call for gun control in wake of Orlando attack and Obama pimped the same attack on Capitol Hill.

Both of these two anti-liberty thugs claimed that the Muslim terrorist and registered democrat had used the hated AR-15.

One minor problem - he didn't.

What he used was a a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system.

Oh, The Orlando Killer Didn't Use An AR-15 Rifle...

Truth doesn't fit with the agenda of democrats, so Hillary and Barack avoid it like the plague.

10.png
Winner.
 
[
So? Is someone saying you can't be harmed by either?

You can be harmed by a childs block left in the middle of the floor.

Are you next going to start a thread about other mistakes. Like calling a Walrus a Sea lion? And pretending that's an important thing when talking about people dying?

Are you leftists trying to ban Walruses?

You are waging war on civil rights, which is very important.
 
Har har...my gun has never killed anyone on its own har har. That old bs.

No one said the gun acted alone silly guy. Really? This is all you have? "Guns don't act on their own"?

Next is your thread on how water doesnt drown people. Hardy har

Your point about which gun killed people doesn't change the lead...which is this gun, while being held by a nut ball, killed lots of people.
 
[
So? Is someone saying you can't be harmed by either?

You can be harmed by a childs block left in the middle of the floor.

Are you next going to start a thread about other mistakes. Like calling a Walrus a Sea lion? And pretending that's an important thing when talking about people dying?

Are you leftists trying to ban Walruses?

You are waging war on civil rights, which is very important.

Now your comparing being shot with stepping on a children's block? You should just tap.
 
I'm saying that crazy people should have a harder time than regular guys.

Feel free to present your counter argument. :badgrin:
 
Har har...my gun has never killed anyone on its own har har. That old bs.

No one said the gun acted alone silly guy. Really? This is all you have? "Guns don't act on their own"?

Next is your thread on how water doesnt drown people. Hardy har

Your point about which gun killed people doesn't change the lead...which is this gun, while being held by a nut ball, killed lots of people.
You ignorant clown
quit blaming the gun be it a AR15 or a Colt 45 neither kills by itself. Someone has to pull the trigger.
That is where the blame should be placed and that is who is responsible, However the clown does not want to blame the sick perverted muslim.
Maybe the clown is afraid of hurting the feelings of other sick perverted muslims. The clown thinks Political Correctness is his main goal,
 
Now your comparing being shot with stepping on a children's block? You should just tap.

You are spewing hyperbole. You are a demagogue using appeals to emotion in hopes of furthering your war on civil rights. Very few guns are ever fired at a human, less that 1% in the USA. YOU and your fellow leftists are attempting to place motive on inanimate objects and claim that banning semi-auto rifles will stop Muslim terrorists from killing.

It's childish idiocy, This was the second most deadly Muslim terrorist attack on this nation; in the first they used box cutters. No doubt you demand that those were "assault box cutters."
 
Before the bodies hit the floor in Orlando, the anti-liberty left was scrambling to climb atop the corpses and attack civil rights.

Nothing that the left and the DNC media like more than attacking the AR-15 style of .22 that is so popular with Americans. Obama and Hillary demanded that the Bill of Rights be revoked,. Clinton renews call for gun control in wake of Orlando attack and Obama pimped the same attack on Capitol Hill.

Both of these two anti-liberty thugs claimed that the Muslim terrorist and registered democrat had used the hated AR-15.

One minor problem - he didn't.

What he used was a a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system.

Oh, The Orlando Killer Didn't Use An AR-15 Rifle...

Truth doesn't fit with the agenda of democrats, so Hillary and Barack avoid it like the plague.

10.png

Let me try and think like a liberal freedom hater-

Doesn't matter what type of gun it was, nobody needs a gun that can kill people, so ban all guns, force all conservatives to take sensitivity training, force all bakeries to make cakes depicting gay Muslims having intercourse, and stop making fun of Hillary and her collection of pant suits.
 
Now your comparing being shot with stepping on a children's block? You should just tap.

You are spewing hyperbole. You are a demagogue using appeals to emotion in hopes of furthering your war on civil rights. Very few guns are ever fired at a human, less that 1% in the USA. YOU and your fellow leftists are attempting to place motive on inanimate objects and claim that banning semi-auto rifles will stop Muslim terrorists from killing.

It's childish idiocy, This was the second most deadly Muslim terrorist attack on this nation; in the first they used box cutters. No doubt you demand that those were "assault box cutters."

Not once has anyone anywhere ever ever ever claimed that guns act on their own. Your constant repeating a point no one objects to is sad.

You can call then cutty cuts for all I care. The label isn't important. I'm saying that a crazy person should have a harder time getting a gun than someone else.

Please present your counter argument
 
what a silly mistake, calling a gun that looks like and uses the parts from a dsecond gun by the wrong name. how could anyone make that mistake?


The Sig Saur does neither, so what is your point?

Good point, now what's your point? Someone misidentified the gun and that's important. Why?

Because politicians and others have been calling for the ban on the AR 15.

So? Are you saying because it wasn't used here then it's a non killing type of gun?

Typical....ok, maybe what we thought happened didn't really happen, but we are still right and you are still wrong, facts be damned,,
 
what a silly mistake, calling a gun that looks like and uses the parts from a dsecond gun by the wrong name. how could anyone make that mistake?


The Sig Saur does neither, so what is your point?

Good point, now what's your point? Someone misidentified the gun and that's important. Why?

Because politicians and others have been calling for the ban on the AR 15.

So? Are you saying because it wasn't used here then it's a non killing type of gun?

Typical....ok, maybe what we thought happened didn't really happen, but we are still right and you are still wrong, facts be damned,,
does it really matter what sort of people killer he used?
 

Forum List

Back
Top