Disir
Platinum Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 28,003
- 9,610
- 910
Pretty much besides the point, have our great entrepreneurs, artists, scientists, etc.. (people like Carnegie, Rockefeller, Ford, Sloan, Vanderbilt, Gates, Einstein, Picasso, Morgan, Jobs, et..al) had character flaws (some pretty severe ones), of course they have, however the part that's WORTH EMULATING is the part that drove them to be the best at whatever field of endeavor they choose to follow, the part that drove them to change the world for the better, the part that drove them to produce VALUE for society. However if you're looking for some water walking, flawless character to emulate I believe you're going to be severely disappointed (especially if you're looking at politicians, who are just useless leeches that produce nothing).I don't know about all the "kneeling" stuff but the fact of the matter many(most?) people would like to be "billionaires" themselves, so who better to emulate than people that have actually become successful enough to claim billion dollar bank accounts? Personally I think it's a lot better to chose a successful entrepreneur as a role model than say some liar politician whose only claim to success is the ability to BS voters into believing their nonsense.
"As we look ahead into the next century, leaders will be those who empower others." -- Bill Gates
Liars? Like astroturfing? Like Pete Peterson? Like Gates? Gates is special. He lied to Congress repeatedly stating that there was a STEM shortage. You know, increase HB 1 visas? Depress wages? Cheap labor?
I think that a large group of people are beyond emulating and simply want to justify corporate governance in the high hopes that they will get a piece of the pie.
"Corporate Governance" ??? What the heck is that? If you're referring to corporate rent seekers and influence buyers perhaps you should place the blame on the SELLERS (i.e. the elected "representatives of the people" and their legions of bureaucrats that sell favoritism to the highest bidders) and not the buyers.
Intentionally driving down wages and outsourcing jobs is a character flaw. I understand emulation when it comes from young people. They try on different personalities. I do not understand this from adults. In fact, it is convenient to call them character flaws to excuse the damage they did/do.
Secondly, it is not a case of either/or in damning the SELLERS or folks like the Koch Brothers. It's a false dichotomy and a pretty convenient one at that. It will force you to take stances that you ordinarily would not take.
The word that we normally use is corporatocracy. However, since the SarbanesOxley Act there is the thought that corporations are beginning to operate like government. It's actually the other way around. Corporations do not exist to look out for the public interest. Yet, some are writing the legislation and consider public entities, like police, to be a government monopoly and seek to privatize. In the States, where these guys are most active, the state is more accountable to the corporations than the citizens. Legitimizing corporate governance as corporate government. Philanthropy has the same motive.
Please note that this in no way states that corporations are vile.