The Left Controls the Media

[Flopper]

I guess that study lost its charm, upon further review.

"Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media."

That's a comparison, not an absolute. NPR is still liberal.

Everything from John McCain leftward is liberal to you.

Left and Right are meaningless abstractions. Someone to my Right, may be to your Left. Thus Right and Left are completely relative to the writer.

 

[edthecynic]

I thought it was a stupid question, synth.
People are going to vote on how they perceive our country is doing, such as unemployment, debt and also the obamacare. That doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out, even you and gag can do it.....I'm sure you can.

Then you are admitting that the fantasy about a Liberal Media controlling who is going to be president is false.

Where did I say anything about the liberal media controlling who is going to be president?
I stated that there is a left bias overall in the media, and backed it up.
A little comprehension goes a long ways in a discussion, synth.

Sure, you "backed it up" all Right, with a phony contrived "study" that said Drudge leans Left!

 

[Meister]

Then you are admitting that the fantasy about a Liberal Media controlling who is going to be president is false.

Where did I say anything about the liberal media controlling who is going to be president?
I stated that there is a left bias overall in the media, and backed it up.
A little comprehension goes a long ways in a discussion, synth.

Sure, you "backed it up" all Right, with a phony contrived "study" that said Drudge leans Left!

Please don't read the study, edddiethe$ynic, you have the same problem as another poster on here. It stated the criteria they used along with the specifics of the Drudge Report....but don't bother yourself with those details.

PS....UCLA isn't really considered a conservative school, in fact, they are quite liberal.

 

[daveman]

I guess that study lost its charm, upon further review.

"Coverage by public television and radio is conservative compared to the rest of the mainstream media."

That's a comparison, not an absolute. NPR is still liberal.

Everything from John McCain leftward is liberal to you.

Instead of making stupid assumptions and pretending you know everything (hint: you don't), all you have to do is ask.

Meanwhile, you made a ridiculous claim that isn't backed up by what you posted based not on reality but what you want reality to be.

Politics is relative. For instance, to a Marxist, a socialist is a fundy rethug.

Others think NPR is conservative. They're really far to the left.

 

[edthecynic]

Where did I say anything about the liberal media controlling who is going to be president?
I stated that there is a left bias overall in the media, and backed it up.
A little comprehension goes a long ways in a discussion, synth.

Sure, you "backed it up" all Right, with a phony contrived "study" that said Drudge leans Left!

Please don't read the study, edddiethe$ynic, you have the same problem as another poster on here. It stated the criteria they used along with the specifics of the Drudge Report....but don't bother yourself with those details.

PS....UCLA isn't really considered a conservative school, in fact, they are quite liberal.

It's the criteria they used that is phony and contrived to create the outcome they wanted. Saying that Drudge leans Left proves just how contrived their "criteria" really was.
Get it???

PS it is even more moronic to ASSume there are no CON$ at UCLA!!!

 

[Trajan]

How many channels do you watch at one time?

answer please, yes, or no.

There is currently parity in so-called cable news channels. The mere fact that Foxnews has a viewership that is equal to or larger than CNN and MSNBC combined (assuming you consider them the so-called lberal media in the category) is ample proof of that.

uh huh.

so there is parity or isn't there ?



or...

you've thought it over and realize how preposterous your statement was and are now trying to back pedal....good boy, you're learning.

 

[Trajan]

Where did I say anything about the liberal media controlling who is going to be president?
I stated that there is a left bias overall in the media, and backed it up.
A little comprehension goes a long ways in a discussion, synth.

Sure, you "backed it up" all Right, with a phony contrived "study" that said Drudge leans Left!

Please don't read the study, edddiethe$ynic, you have the same problem as another poster on here. It stated the criteria they used along with the specifics of the Drudge Report....but don't bother yourself with those details.

PS....UCLA isn't really considered a conservative school, in fact, they are quite liberal.

please pardon my vulgarity but it really is the; "your shit stinks mine don't" group think.


if you accept the premise that Fox has bias, then so to are the rest. now , me you and the logical people here realize that.

we also realize that as fox has preponderance of cons that of course effects their views, there fore their prodcuts.....


BUT there are folks right here, who will tell you ( or will dance till their feet fall off when you press them) , no, that is not so, their poopy don't stank...only ours does.

See, liberals have this magic unicorn that distributes objectivity amongst them, that is denied to Cons...Ergo; libs are sweetness and light, sensible, objective, they report right down the middle of the road, Cons? they cannot help themselves.

 

[Trajan]

Sure, you "backed it up" all Right, with a phony contrived "study" that said Drudge leans Left!

Please don't read the study, edddiethe$ynic, you have the same problem as another poster on here. It stated the criteria they used along with the specifics of the Drudge Report....but don't bother yourself with those details.

PS....UCLA isn't really considered a conservative school, in fact, they are quite liberal.

It's the criteria they used that is phony and contrived to create the outcome they wanted. Saying that Drudge leans Left proves just how contrived their "criteria" really was.
Get it???

PS it is even more moronic to ASSume there are no CON$ at UCLA!!!

well, thats always possible. please describe and provide some examples that lead to the contrived or jigged results they wished to validate...thank you in advance.

 

[Meister]

Sure, you "backed it up" all Right, with a phony contrived "study" that said Drudge leans Left!

Please don't read the study, edddiethe$ynic, you have the same problem as another poster on here. It stated the criteria they used along with the specifics of the Drudge Report....but don't bother yourself with those details.

PS....UCLA isn't really considered a conservative school, in fact, they are quite liberal.

It's the criteria they used that is phony and contrived to create the outcome they wanted. Saying that Drudge leans Left proves just how contrived their "criteria" really was.
Get it???

PS it is even more moronic to ASSume there are no CON$ at UCLA!!!

Once you get away from rushbo, you really have nothing, huh?
Most of the Drudge Report's articles are straight from msm, doofus.
'His' reports are right leaning, but most of his stuff he gets from the left leaning msm.
It really is pathetic that you just can't read the article...I know it was small type and there wasn't pictures or cartoons, but......

 

[edthecynic]

Please don't read the study, edddiethe$ynic, you have the same problem as another poster on here. It stated the criteria they used along with the specifics of the Drudge Report....but don't bother yourself with those details.

PS....UCLA isn't really considered a conservative school, in fact, they are quite liberal.

It's the criteria they used that is phony and contrived to create the outcome they wanted. Saying that Drudge leans Left proves just how contrived their "criteria" really was.
Get it???

PS it is even more moronic to ASSume there are no CON$ at UCLA!!!

Once you get away from rushbo, you really have nothing, huh?
Most of the Drudge Report's articles are straight from msm, doofus.
'His' reports are right leaning, but most of his stuff he gets from the left leaning msm.
It really is pathetic that you just can't read the article...I know it was small type and there wasn't pictures or cartoons, but......

Well at least you subconsciously admit Drudge leans Right. Just because he posts left leaning stuff on his site for ridicule, does not make him lean Left. It clearly makes him lean further Right.

 

[Meister]

It's the criteria they used that is phony and contrived to create the outcome they wanted. Saying that Drudge leans Left proves just how contrived their "criteria" really was.
Get it???

PS it is even more moronic to ASSume there are no CON$ at UCLA!!!

Once you get away from rushbo, you really have nothing, huh?
Most of the Drudge Report's articles are straight from msm, doofus.
'His' reports are right leaning, but most of his stuff he gets from the left leaning msm.
It really is pathetic that you just can't read the article...I know it was small type and there wasn't pictures or cartoons, but......

Well at least you subconsciously admit Drudge leans Right. Just because he posts left leaning stuff on his site for ridicule, does not make him lean Left. It clearly makes him lean further Right.

I didn't subconsciously admit anything, I was stating a fact. I'm also stating a fact about the "Drudge Report", the "subject" of the discussion.
I'm waiting for you to admit that you just may be wrong about the UCLA study.....something tells me you don't have the integrity to do that.

 

[edthecynic]

Once you get away from rushbo, you really have nothing, huh?
Most of the Drudge Report's articles are straight from msm, doofus.
'His' reports are right leaning, but most of his stuff he gets from the left leaning msm.
It really is pathetic that you just can't read the article...I know it was small type and there wasn't pictures or cartoons, but......

Well at least you subconsciously admit Drudge leans Right. Just because he posts left leaning stuff on his site for ridicule, does not make him lean Left. It clearly makes him lean further Right.

I didn't subconsciously admit anything, I was stating a fact. I'm also stating a fact about the "Drudge Report", the "subject" of the discussion.
I'm waiting for you to admit that you just may be wrong about the UCLA study.....something tells me you don't have the integrity to do that.

The "study" is worthless because the CRITERIA used to create the "data" is moronic. You are just too dishonest to admit that!

 

[daveman]

Well at least you subconsciously admit Drudge leans Right. Just because he posts left leaning stuff on his site for ridicule, does not make him lean Left. It clearly makes him lean further Right.

I didn't subconsciously admit anything, I was stating a fact. I'm also stating a fact about the "Drudge Report", the "subject" of the discussion.
I'm waiting for you to admit that you just may be wrong about the UCLA study.....something tells me you don't have the integrity to do that.

The "study" is worthless because the CRITERIA used to create the "data" is moronic. You are just too dishonest to admit that!

How do you know? Did you read the study?

Or is this just knee-jerk leftist dismissal of everything that doesn't exactly parallel your narrow little worldview?

I expect it's the latter.

 

[Meister]

Well at least you subconsciously admit Drudge leans Right. Just because he posts left leaning stuff on his site for ridicule, does not make him lean Left. It clearly makes him lean further Right.

I didn't subconsciously admit anything, I was stating a fact. I'm also stating a fact about the "Drudge Report", the "subject" of the discussion.
I'm waiting for you to admit that you just may be wrong about the UCLA study.....something tells me you don't have the integrity to do that.

The "study" is worthless because the CRITERIA used to create the "data" is moronic. You are just too dishonest to admit that!

I knew you had no integrity, eddiethe$ynic. No facts about the study, just your partisan hack view.

 

[edthecynic]

I didn't subconsciously admit anything, I was stating a fact. I'm also stating a fact about the "Drudge Report", the "subject" of the discussion.
I'm waiting for you to admit that you just may be wrong about the UCLA study.....something tells me you don't have the integrity to do that.

The "study" is worthless because the CRITERIA used to create the "data" is moronic. You are just too dishonest to admit that!

How do you know? Did you read the study?

Or is this just knee-jerk leftist dismissal of everything that doesn't exactly parallel your narrow little worldview?

I expect it's the latter.

Yes I've read the fake study, obviously you haven't. You CON$ have been parroting it on this messageboard for years. It keeps being debunked only to be parroted on a new thread.

 

[daveman]

The "study" is worthless because the CRITERIA used to create the "data" is moronic. You are just too dishonest to admit that!

How do you know? Did you read the study?

Or is this just knee-jerk leftist dismissal of everything that doesn't exactly parallel your narrow little worldview?

I expect it's the latter.

Yes I've read the fake study, obviously you haven't. You CON$ have been parroting it on this messageboard for years. It keeps being debunked only to be parroted on a new thread.

Yeah, that's what HuffPo told you.

Funny how you believed that horseshit study about liberals being smarter than conservatives, huh?

 

[Meister]

The "study" is worthless because the CRITERIA used to create the "data" is moronic. You are just too dishonest to admit that!

How do you know? Did you read the study?

Or is this just knee-jerk leftist dismissal of everything that doesn't exactly parallel your narrow little worldview?

I expect it's the latter.

Yes I've read the fake study, obviously you haven't. You CON$ have been parroting it on this messageboard for years. It keeps being debunked only to be parroted on a new thread.

Prove it. It's been debunked you say, so prove it.

 

[edthecynic]

I didn't subconsciously admit anything, I was stating a fact. I'm also stating a fact about the "Drudge Report", the "subject" of the discussion.
I'm waiting for you to admit that you just may be wrong about the UCLA study.....something tells me you don't have the integrity to do that.

The "study" is worthless because the CRITERIA used to create the "data" is moronic. You are just too dishonest to admit that!

I knew you had no integrity, eddieth$ynic. No facts about the study, just your partisan hack view.

I gave you an obvious fact, it said Drudge leans Left. Any criteria that comes up with Drudge leaning Left is obviously flawed. You are just too dishonest to admit it. The shear stupidity of using politicians and think tanks to rate the media is moronic on its face!!! Only a total HACK can't see that!!!

 

[Meister]

The "study" is worthless because the CRITERIA used to create the "data" is moronic. You are just too dishonest to admit that!

I knew you had no integrity, eddieth$ynic. No facts about the study, just your partisan hack view.

I gave you an obvious fact, it said Drudge leans Left. Any criteria that comes up with Drudge leaning Left is obviously flawed. You are just too dishonest to admit it. The shear stupidity of using politicians and think tanks to rate the media is moronic on its face!!! Only a total HACK can't see that!!!

Idiot! It didn't say Drudge leans left, it says the "Drudge Report" leans left, and it gave their reason for saying it. You are one dishonest hack with no integrity.

 

[edthecynic]

How do you know? Did you read the study?

Or is this just knee-jerk leftist dismissal of everything that doesn't exactly parallel your narrow little worldview?

I expect it's the latter.

Yes I've read the fake study, obviously you haven't. You CON$ have been parroting it on this messageboard for years. It keeps being debunked only to be parroted on a new thread.

Yeah, that's what HuffPo told you.

Funny how you believed that horseshit study about liberals being smarter than conservatives, huh?

Please provide links to both lies.
Thank you in advance.