The Mayorkas Impeachment Should Go To The Supreme Court Now!

[JimofPennsylvan]

This is really alarming the impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, it sets a dangerous precedent that Cabinet Secretaries can be impeached for violating the law as the majority Party of the House of Representatives. Practically it allows for impeachment of Secretaries of major government departments for policy differences with the majority Party in the House and since these Secretaries are carrying out the policies of the President this will weaken the power of the Presidency this is a bad development. The framework of our goverment is the Congress makes the laws and the President administers the laws Congress should not be permitted to obstruct the President in administering the laws as he or she sees fit. Congress always has a remedy to go to the third branch of government the Court system to enjoin the Executive Branch of government to follow the law. This impeachment move by the House against Secretary Mayorkas has a profound effect on our form of government it is a power grab by the House of Representatives if let stand it will cause repeated harm in America as future officials in future Presidential administrations are impeached for policy difference or unacceptable performance as determined by the House majority. The U.S. Constitution requires that crimes to have been committed for an impeachment to lie. If one reads the articles of impeachment against Mayorkas no fact patterns are alleged for crimes, for violations of law yes but that is policy differences.

This House impeachment of Secretary Mayorkas needs to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court so they can overturn it for violating the U.S. Constitution for impeaching someone where there is no crime committed, it is a policy difference or a performance difference. It is not okay or good that a plan be followed where the Senate gets rid of the impeachment because that won't void this impeachment precedent. I am not a constitutional lawyer but I think that any member of the House should have standing for such an appeal because allowing impeachment for policy differences affects the effectiveness of their chamber, it can allow for wasteful and illegal legislative action, Further, I think any member of the Senate should have standing to appeal this impeachment for essentially a similar reason that this illegal impeachment will waste Senate precious time holding a trial or other proceedings to resolve the impeachment matter!

 

[excalibur]

Impeachment is not justiciable.

 

[1srelluc]

I'd say what is happening on our borders is due to criminal negligence and ignoring our current laws.

 

[0311]

This is really alarming the impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, it sets a dangerous precedent that Cabinet Secretaries can be impeached for violating the law as the majority Party of the House of Representatives. Practically it allows for impeachment of Secretaries of major government departments for policy differences with the majority Party in the House and since these Secretaries are carrying out the policies of the President this will weaken the power of the Presidency this is a bad development. The framework of our goverment is the Congress makes the laws and the President administers the laws Congress should not be permitted to obstruct the President in administering the laws as he or she sees fit. Congress always has a remedy to go to the third branch of government the Court system to enjoin the Executive Branch of government to follow the law. This impeachment move by the House against Secretary Mayorkas has a profound effect on our form of government it is a power grab by the House of Representatives if let stand it will cause repeated harm in America as future officials in future Presidential administrations are impeached for policy difference or unacceptable performance as determined by the House majority. The U.S. Constitution requires that crimes to have been committed for an impeachment to lie. If one reads the articles of impeachment against Mayorkas no fact patterns are alleged for crimes, for violations of law yes but that is policy differences.

This House impeachment of Secretary Mayorkas needs to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court so they can overturn it for violating the U.S. Constitution for impeaching someone where there is no crime committed, it is a policy difference or a performance difference. It is not okay or good that a plan be followed where the Senate gets rid of the impeachment because that won't void this impeachment precedent. I am not a constitutional lawyer but I think that any member of the House should have standing for such an appeal because allowing impeachment for policy differences affects the effectiveness of their chamber, it can allow for wasteful and illegal legislative action, Further, I think any member of the Senate should have standing to appeal this impeachment for essentially a similar reason that this illegal impeachment will waste Senate precious time holding a trial or other proceedings to resolve the impeachment matter!

The Senate won't touch it. It clearly political proecustion. ReNaziKlans do no want the border fixed.

They voted down their bill because P01135809 wanted it dead. There is no evidence against Mayorkas, only lies of ReNaziKlans.

 

[citygator]

So the super smart poster... starts a thread under "Congress" topic... about the Supreme Court... that doesnt decide an impeachment since that is the Senates job? Spectacular self own.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This is really alarming the impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, it sets a dangerous precedent that Cabinet Secretaries can be impeached for violating the law as the majority Party of the House of Representatives. Practically it allows for impeachment of Secretaries of major government departments for policy differences with the majority Party in the House and since these Secretaries are carrying out the policies of the President this will weaken the power of the Presidency this is a bad development. The framework of our goverment is the Congress makes the laws and the President administers the laws Congress should not be permitted to obstruct the President in administering the laws as he or she sees fit. Congress always has a remedy to go to the third branch of government the Court system to enjoin the Executive Branch of government to follow the law. This impeachment move by the House against Secretary Mayorkas has a profound effect on our form of government it is a power grab by the House of Representatives if let stand it will cause repeated harm in America as future officials in future Presidential administrations are impeached for policy difference or unacceptable performance as determined by the House majority. The U.S. Constitution requires that crimes to have been committed for an impeachment to lie. If one reads the articles of impeachment against Mayorkas no fact patterns are alleged for crimes, for violations of law yes but that is policy differences.

This House impeachment of Secretary Mayorkas needs to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court so they can overturn it for violating the U.S. Constitution for impeaching someone where there is no crime committed, it is a policy difference or a performance difference. It is not okay or good that a plan be followed where the Senate gets rid of the impeachment because that won't void this impeachment precedent. I am not a constitutional lawyer but I think that any member of the House should have standing for such an appeal because allowing impeachment for policy differences affects the effectiveness of their chamber, it can allow for wasteful and illegal legislative action, Further, I think any member of the Senate should have standing to appeal this impeachment for essentially a similar reason that this illegal impeachment will waste Senate precious time holding a trial or other proceedings to resolve the impeachment matter!

Please cite the Constitution where the SCOTUS can review impeachments. Until you can, you have nothing. It is a separation of powers issue.

 

[Arlette]

I'd say what is happening on our borders is due to criminal negligence and ignoring our current laws.

I say what's happening at the border is the result of propping up ruthless right wing thugs in central America. It came back to bite us in the ass.

 

[1srelluc]

I say what's happening at the border is the result of propping up ruthless right wing thugs in central America. It came back to bite us in the ass.

There was no reason for it to had current law been followed.....You know Maduro emptied out his prisons and sent them north don't you?.....He also is refusing to take them back....Just like the Chi-Coms are....Claims they are not from China.

I know it's a inconvenient truth for ya leftists but there it is.

 

[Votto]

This is really alarming the impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, it sets a dangerous precedent that Cabinet Secretaries can be impeached for violating the law as the majority Party of the House of Representatives. Practically it allows for impeachment of Secretaries of major government departments for policy differences with the majority Party in the House and since these Secretaries are carrying out the policies of the President this will weaken the power of the Presidency this is a bad development. The framework of our goverment is the Congress makes the laws and the President administers the laws Congress should not be permitted to obstruct the President in administering the laws as he or she sees fit. Congress always has a remedy to go to the third branch of government the Court system to enjoin the Executive Branch of government to follow the law. This impeachment move by the House against Secretary Mayorkas has a profound effect on our form of government it is a power grab by the House of Representatives if let stand it will cause repeated harm in America as future officials in future Presidential administrations are impeached for policy difference or unacceptable performance as determined by the House majority. The U.S. Constitution requires that crimes to have been committed for an impeachment to lie. If one reads the articles of impeachment against Mayorkas no fact patterns are alleged for crimes, for violations of law yes but that is policy differences.

This House impeachment of Secretary Mayorkas needs to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court so they can overturn it for violating the U.S. Constitution for impeaching someone where there is no crime committed, it is a policy difference or a performance difference. It is not okay or good that a plan be followed where the Senate gets rid of the impeachment because that won't void this impeachment precedent. I am not a constitutional lawyer but I think that any member of the House should have standing for such an appeal because allowing impeachment for policy differences affects the effectiveness of their chamber, it can allow for wasteful and illegal legislative action, Further, I think any member of the Senate should have standing to appeal this impeachment for essentially a similar reason that this illegal impeachment will waste Senate precious time holding a trial or other proceedings to resolve the impeachment matter!

If the President is not doing his job then he needs to not just be weakened, he needs to be removed.

Do your damn job Biden!!

No? Off you go then.

These morons don't have tenure at a college. People should lose their job when they fail to do them.

Mayorkas lied his ass off saying there was no crisis for 3 damned years, so my question is, what changed here lately? Did the crisis start at 5 million, 6 million, 8 million? When did the little retard bulb go off on that shiny head of his telling him the US had an immigration problem.

And to think, people like Mayorkas stopped Trump from building a border wall like he wanted, and what he did build they welded the doors open. Funny, if walls did not work, why did they need to weld the doors open?

Then they repeal off of the Trump policies that helped keep immigration in check and they now blame Trump for it all

The level of stupidity is truly astounding.

What does SCOTUS have to bring to the table on this? They already ruled Texas must open their borders so the crisis could expand, but they ignored them, and rightly so.

Texas needs representation, but they are not getting any at the federal level. Texas must demand representation since they have taken in over 8 million illegals New York gets a few hundred thousand and they cry like babies about their little crisis while supporting the same people at the federal level who is igoring and abusing the people of the state of Texas.

As a result, I could care less what SCOTUS has to say about the border. A state without representation should not listen to the tyrants yanking their chain. If SCOTUS wants to throw Texas in jail for defending their border, then build a wall around it and hire a warden to watch them, that way maybe we can have a border wall.

Idiots!!

 

[The Irish Ram]

Cabinet Secretaries can be impeached for violating the law

As well they should be...

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Both times that Trump was impeached Democrats assured us that no crime need actually be committed for an impeachment. Democrats set this dangerous precedent.

 

[Votto]

Both times that Trump was impeached Democrats assured us that no crime need actually be committed for an impeachment. Democrats set this dangerous precedent.

Democrats care little about the repercussions of their actions.

They just don't give a damn.

As a result, none of them should give a damn about anything they say or want or do either.

We just need them gone is all.

 

[0311]

If the President is not doing his job

Don't blame Mr. Biden for the border when P01135809 told ReNaziKlans to kill the border bill. He did NOT want a "Win" for Biden.

Also, as one poster pointed out SCOTUS has no jurisdiction in matter. SCOTUS rules on the constitutionality of laws. Mayorcas is sop for MAGA MAGGOTS after failing at trying to impeach Mr. Biden.

 

[justoffal]

Please cite the Constitution where the SCOTUS can review impeachments. Until you can, you have nothing. It is a separation of powers issue.

My God! Please don't encourage him the write more. We may be subject to a 100,000 treatise that intimidates Tolstoy.

 

[justoffal]

Don't blame Mr. Biden for the border when P01135809 told ReNaziKlans to kill the border bill. He did NOT want a "Win" for Biden.

Also, as one poster pointed out SCOTUS has no jurisdiction in matter. SCOTUS rules on the constitutionality of laws. Mayorcas is sop for MAGA MAGGOTS after failing at trying to impeach Mr. Biden.

The inappropriately named Bill was loaded with poison pills.

 

[1miseryindex]

, it sets a dangerous precedent that Cabinet Secretaries can be impeached for violating the law as the majority Party of the House of Representatives.

I guess you mean BY the majority party?

In any case, you are wrong as can be. If a Secretary's job is to secure or help to secure the border, which obviously involves upholding the laws on the books

and he doesn't do it..

Impeachment

Be gone, anti-America creep

Have you forgotten they take an oath to uphold the laws and the US Constitution?

 

[Hollie]

The Senate won't touch it. It clearly political proecustion. ReNaziKlans do no want the border fixed.

They voted down their bill because P01135809 wanted it dead. There is no evidence against Mayorkas, only lies of ReNaziKlans.

''There is no evidence against Mayorkas, only lies of ReNaziKlans.''


There needs to be an age limit to keep the juvenile spammers off the board.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Don't blame Mr. Biden for the border when P01135809 told ReNaziKlans to kill the border bill. He did NOT want a "Win" for Biden.

Also, as one poster pointed out SCOTUS has no jurisdiction in matter. SCOTUS rules on the constitutionality of laws. Mayorcas is sop for MAGA MAGGOTS after failing at trying to impeach Mr. Biden.

Biden's impeachment is still on the griddle. Biggest failure and corrupt president of all time.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

This House impeachment of Secretary Mayorkas needs to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court so they can overturn it for violating the U.S. Constitution for impeaching someone where there is no crime committed, it is a policy difference or a performance difference. It is not okay or good that a plan be followed where the Senate gets rid of the impeachment because that won't void this impeachment precedent.

The criminal Mayorkas is very obviously, undeniably guilty of malfeasance and treason. There's no rational or honest basis on which to argue that he's not.

It is a specific duty of his position to defend the security of this nation, and he has openly acted to undermine the security of this nation. That's malfeasance.

He has aided and abetted a hostile foreign invasion of this country, giving aid, comfort and support to the invaders. That's treason.

I wonder if you would argue for similar action against the two impeachments of Donald Trump. Unlike the impeachment of the malfeasant traitor Mayorkas, both of the Trump impeachments were based on blatantly bullshit accusations.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

So the super smart poster... starts a thread under "Congress" topic... about the Supreme Court... that doesnt [sic] decide an impeachment since that is the Senates job? Spectacular self own.

Threads like this are why “OP is a faggot” memes were created.