Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Israel stole Jerusalem and the West Bank from Palestine,
The creation of Poland was the recognition of the right of indigenous, and was not taken by any of the participants in WWII.
What did they win and who did they win it from?
Already told you.
More territory. From Mandate land held by no other nation.
And they kicked a bunch of Arab ass.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not land owned by the British, but land owned by Palestine.
The British were just under mandate to help protect and administer for the Palestinian Arabs.
How is that relevant?
Clearly Israel had the latest US weapons
In 1948? Are you drunk again?
YES in 1948.
The US sent about 20 B-17 bombers, which were only a few years old, flown from Florida to Palestine.
About 50 p-51 Mustangs, about the best fighter in the world at the time, were sent in crates.
And after being re-gunned in Czechoslovakia, the M-4 Sherman tanks were also about the best in the world.
All the latest WWII weapons just recently use by the US armed forces.
Also artillery, machineguns, rifles, pistols, etc.
In comparison, the Arabs had more like WWI relics because the British and French had blocked them from getting weapons.
The US sent about 20 B-17 bombers,
The US government? I don't believe you.
About 50 p-51 Mustangs, about the best fighter in the world at the time, were sent in crates.
50? Sent by the US government? I don't believe you.
In comparison, the Arabs had more like WWI relics
Plus, you said they only sent a couple of dozen troops.
They survived and held most of their territory against 5 Arab Armies.Turn it around. What did Israel win and from whom?They did not meet their goals . You don’t have to lose territory to lose a war .Wow, that was an act of desperation Tinmore. Really??This article needs additional citations for verification.In the beginning where it says Result: Israeli victory. It also says Palestinian Arab defeat..Where does it say that Israel won that war?https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab–Israeli_War
let me guess, you’re going to twist the word ‘victory’ and claim it doesn’t mean ‘to win’... right Tinmore ?
How about this:
“Another factor that contributed to the 1948 defeat”
Why the Arabs were defeated
Historians argue the reasons behind Arab losses against Israel in 1948.www.aljazeera.com
This article comes from your favourite source, Al Jazeera. The entire article is based on why the Arabs lost and Israel won.
From the same article :
The forces of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Israeli military......What did Egypt lose?The forces of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Israeli military......
What did Syria lose?
What did Lebanon lose?
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
You lost the argument Tinmore, again.
Nice duck BTW
Their goal was to eliminate the Jews and conquer the lands they failed both objectives.What did Egypt lose?I have answered everything you have asked me and provided several links. You have provided NOTHING . Just ducking and dancing. Now you are accusing me of exactly what you are doing , trying to retreat when you know you lost ..No, you just are trying to move away from my questions.Yet another duck by Tinmore. What’s the record for ducks by one poster in one thread? It must be Tinmore.Holy obfuscation, Batman.You keep posting under the false premise that Israel had to physically win something in order to win the war . Wars are won or lost based on goals that are met or not. I provided several links already to back up my statement that Israel win the 1948 war, you have provided Nothing but ducks and dancing !That wasn't the question.They met their goals, which was to repel the Arab armies . Simple as that.Turn it around. What did Israel win and from whom?They did not meet their goals . You don’t have to lose territory to lose a war .Wow, that was an act of desperation Tinmore. Really??This article needs additional citations for verification.In the beginning where it says Result: Israeli victory. It also says Palestinian Arab defeat..Where does it say that Israel won that war?https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab–Israeli_War
let me guess, you’re going to twist the word ‘victory’ and claim it doesn’t mean ‘to win’... right Tinmore ?
How about this:
“Another factor that contributed to the 1948 defeat”
Why the Arabs were defeated
Historians argue the reasons behind Arab losses against Israel in 1948.
This article comes from your favourite source, Al Jazeera. The entire article is based on why the Arabs lost and Israel won.
From the same article :
The forces of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Israeli military......What did Egypt lose?The forces of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Israeli military......
What did Syria lose?
What did Lebanon lose?
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
You lost the argument Tinmore, again.
Nice duck BTW
Whenever he loses an argument, he tries to retreat by accusing the other poster is ducking .
I’m still waiting for just one link to contradict what I posted Tinmore . Just one..
What did Syria lose?
What did Lebanon lose?
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
Just like the heavy water the US government sent to Israel to make nuclear weapons, of course middle men were used to hide direct involvement by the US government.
But clearly none of these illegal weapons would have reached Israel unless the US government was responsible.
The creation of Poland was the recognition of the right of indigenous, and was not taken by any of the participants in WWII.
But some of the land previously belonged to Germany, right?
Poland was invaded in WWII, right? That means they participated, right?
Not in 1948 dumb ass.What did Egypt lose?I have answered everything you have asked me and provided several links. You have provided NOTHING . Just ducking and dancing. Now you are accusing me of exactly what you are doing , trying to retreat when you know you lost ..No, you just are trying to move away from my questions.Yet another duck by Tinmore. What’s the record for ducks by one poster in one thread? It must be Tinmore.Holy obfuscation, Batman.You keep posting under the false premise that Israel had to physically win something in order to win the war . Wars are won or lost based on goals that are met or not. I provided several links already to back up my statement that Israel win the 1948 war, you have provided Nothing but ducks and dancing !That wasn't the question.They met their goals, which was to repel the Arab armies . Simple as that.Turn it around. What did Israel win and from whom?They did not meet their goals . You don’t have to lose territory to lose a war .Wow, that was an act of desperation Tinmore. Really??This article needs additional citations for verification.In the beginning where it says Result: Israeli victory. It also says Palestinian Arab defeat..Where does it say that Israel won that war?https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab–Israeli_War
let me guess, you’re going to twist the word ‘victory’ and claim it doesn’t mean ‘to win’... right Tinmore ?
How about this:
“Another factor that contributed to the 1948 defeat”
Why the Arabs were defeated
Historians argue the reasons behind Arab losses against Israel in 1948.
This article comes from your favourite source, Al Jazeera. The entire article is based on why the Arabs lost and Israel won.
From the same article :
The forces of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Israeli military......What did Egypt lose?The forces of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Israeli military......
What did Syria lose?
What did Lebanon lose?
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
You lost the argument Tinmore, again.
Nice duck BTW
Whenever he loses an argument, he tries to retreat by accusing the other poster is ducking .
I’m still waiting for just one link to contradict what I posted Tinmore . Just one..
What did Syria lose?
What did Lebanon lose?
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
What did Egypt lose?
They got their ass kicked.
What did Syria lose?
They got their ass kicked.
What did Lebanon lose?
They got their ass kicked.
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
They got their ass kicked.
How is that relevant?
Clearly Israel had the latest US weapons, while the Arab states had old surplus that was decades obsolete.
The creation of Poland was the recognition of the right of indigenous, and was not taken by any of the participants in WWII.
But some of the land previously belonged to Germany, right?
Poland was invaded in WWII, right? That means they participated, right?
No, Poland essentially did not participate in WWII.
The partition between German and Russia of what used to be Poland, actually happened before WWII.
And Poland most definitely did not invade, and then later try to annex the land they had captured.
That is what is illegal.
Borders can change after wars, but only due to the rights of the indigenous natives, not a gain by conquest.
The 1967 invasion of the West Bank by Israel is totally and completely illegal and can then never be recognized by anyone.
Just like the heavy water the US government sent to Israel to make nuclear weapons, of course middle men were used to hide direct involvement by the US government.
Oh. Middle men. So you don't have any actual proof.
All arms to everyone else was blocked.
So the Arabs were even dumber than I first thought.
They sent a few dozen soldiers with crappy old weapons.
What a bunch of morons.
What did they win and who did they win it from?
Already told you.
More territory. From Mandate land held by no other nation.
And they kicked a bunch of Arab ass.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not land owned by the British, but land owned by Palestine.
The British were just under mandate to help protect and administer for the Palestinian Arabs.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not land owned by the British
I never said it was owned by the British. Did you?
but land owned by Palestine.
No such country.
The British were just under mandate to help protect and administer for the Palestinian Arabs.
And the Palestinian Jews.
Just like the heavy water the US government sent to Israel to make nuclear weapons, of course middle men were used to hide direct involvement by the US government.
Oh. Middle men. So you don't have any actual proof.
All arms to everyone else was blocked.
So the Arabs were even dumber than I first thought.
They sent a few dozen soldiers with crappy old weapons.
What a bunch of morons.
No, it is called being bribed by the US.
The Arab nations were not really allowed to have significant arms because the French and British had been invading them for so long, they did not want them to have any significant arms.
{...
War History Online proudly presents this Guest Piece from Christopher Stuttard
Prior to and during 1947, the Jewish paramilitary group, the Haganah (precursor to the Israeli Defense Forces), had been procuring weapons in the build-up to the “Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel,” otherwise known as Israeli independence from Britain and Palestine.
Under the leadership of Israel’s founding father, David Ben-Gurion, the underground operatives of the Haganah had been manufacturing and stockpiling small arms in what Benny Morris dubbed: “a massive, covert arms acquisition campaign in the West.”
By late September 1947, they had an arsenal of rifles, sub-machine guns, mortars, and light machine guns. These weapons numbered in the thousands. However, the problem the fledgling force faced was a distinct lack of heavy weaponry, aircraft, and armored units.
Solution
Enter the curious case of Charles “Charlie” Thompson Winters. Born February 10, 1913, in Brookline, Massachusetts, Charlie Winters procured four B-17 Flying Fortresses with the bold plan of retrofitting them and delivering them to the newly created Israeli AirForce.
Along with Al Schwimmer and Herman “Hank” Greenspun, Winters was essential in the creation of the Israeli Air Force and a major contributor to the course of the first Arab-Israeli war in 1948.
In 1948, Winters was running a freight service between Miami, Florida and the Caribbean, mainly transporting fruit and vegetables. He used his piloting skills and export license to deliver three B-17 bombers to Israel.
Taking off from Miami, the B-17s refueled in Puerto Rico as they would do in a normal produce delivery.
Then, instead of heading to the Caribbean with their usual cargo, the heavy bombers were piloted to the Azores and then to Žatec in former Czechoslovakia. Winters flew one of the aircraft himself.
...}
The CIA smuggled many more with similar methodology.
None could have happened without the knowledge and assistance of the US government.
Palestine legally existed in 1920 by the Allies and Axis powers signing the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres.
Not in 1948 dumb ass.What did Egypt lose?I have answered everything you have asked me and provided several links. You have provided NOTHING . Just ducking and dancing. Now you are accusing me of exactly what you are doing , trying to retreat when you know you lost ..No, you just are trying to move away from my questions.Yet another duck by Tinmore. What’s the record for ducks by one poster in one thread? It must be Tinmore.Holy obfuscation, Batman.You keep posting under the false premise that Israel had to physically win something in order to win the war . Wars are won or lost based on goals that are met or not. I provided several links already to back up my statement that Israel win the 1948 war, you have provided Nothing but ducks and dancing !That wasn't the question.They met their goals, which was to repel the Arab armies . Simple as that.Turn it around. What did Israel win and from whom?They did not meet their goals . You don’t have to lose territory to lose a war .Wow, that was an act of desperation Tinmore. Really??This article needs additional citations for verification.In the beginning where it says Result: Israeli victory. It also says Palestinian Arab defeat..Where does it say that Israel won that war?https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab–Israeli_War
let me guess, you’re going to twist the word ‘victory’ and claim it doesn’t mean ‘to win’... right Tinmore ?
How about this:
“Another factor that contributed to the 1948 defeat”
Why the Arabs were defeated
Historians argue the reasons behind Arab losses against Israel in 1948.
This article comes from your favourite source, Al Jazeera. The entire article is based on why the Arabs lost and Israel won.
From the same article :
The forces of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Israeli military......What did Egypt lose?The forces of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Transjordan suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Israeli military......
What did Syria lose?
What did Lebanon lose?
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
You lost the argument Tinmore, again.
Nice duck BTW
Whenever he loses an argument, he tries to retreat by accusing the other poster is ducking .
I’m still waiting for just one link to contradict what I posted Tinmore . Just one..
What did Syria lose?
What did Lebanon lose?
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
What did Egypt lose?
They got their ass kicked.
What did Syria lose?
They got their ass kicked.
What did Lebanon lose?
They got their ass kicked.
What did Transjordan/Iraq lose?
They got their ass kicked.
How is that relevant?
Clearly Israel had the latest US weapons, while the Arab states had old surplus that was decades obsolete.
Just like the heavy water the US government sent to Israel to make nuclear weapons, of course middle men were used to hide direct involvement by the US government.
Oh. Middle men. So you don't have any actual proof.
All arms to everyone else was blocked.
So the Arabs were even dumber than I first thought.
They sent a few dozen soldiers with crappy old weapons.
What a bunch of morons.
No, it is called being bribed by the US.
The Arab nations were not really allowed to have significant arms because the French and British had been invading them for so long, they did not want them to have any significant arms.
{...
War History Online proudly presents this Guest Piece from Christopher Stuttard
Prior to and during 1947, the Jewish paramilitary group, the Haganah (precursor to the Israeli Defense Forces), had been procuring weapons in the build-up to the “Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel,” otherwise known as Israeli independence from Britain and Palestine.
Under the leadership of Israel’s founding father, David Ben-Gurion, the underground operatives of the Haganah had been manufacturing and stockpiling small arms in what Benny Morris dubbed: “a massive, covert arms acquisition campaign in the West.”
By late September 1947, they had an arsenal of rifles, sub-machine guns, mortars, and light machine guns. These weapons numbered in the thousands. However, the problem the fledgling force faced was a distinct lack of heavy weaponry, aircraft, and armored units.
Solution
Enter the curious case of Charles “Charlie” Thompson Winters. Born February 10, 1913, in Brookline, Massachusetts, Charlie Winters procured four B-17 Flying Fortresses with the bold plan of retrofitting them and delivering them to the newly created Israeli AirForce.
Along with Al Schwimmer and Herman “Hank” Greenspun, Winters was essential in the creation of the Israeli Air Force and a major contributor to the course of the first Arab-Israeli war in 1948.
In 1948, Winters was running a freight service between Miami, Florida and the Caribbean, mainly transporting fruit and vegetables. He used his piloting skills and export license to deliver three B-17 bombers to Israel.
Taking off from Miami, the B-17s refueled in Puerto Rico as they would do in a normal produce delivery.
Then, instead of heading to the Caribbean with their usual cargo, the heavy bombers were piloted to the Azores and then to Žatec in former Czechoslovakia. Winters flew one of the aircraft himself.
...}
The CIA smuggled many more with similar methodology.
None could have happened without the knowledge and assistance of the US government.
The Arab nations were not really allowed to have significant arms because the French and British had been invading them for so long, they did not want them to have any significant arms.
You convinced me. The Arabs were morons.
Enter the curious case of Charles “Charlie” Thompson Winters. Born February 10, 1913, in Brookline, Massachusetts, Charlie Winters procured four B-17 Flying Fortresses with the bold plan of retrofitting them and delivering them to the newly created Israeli AirForce.
That was awesome!!!
Palestine legally existed in 1920 by the Allies and Axis powers signing the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres.
You're lying.
There were not to be any Jewish involvement in the government of Palestine.
What government of Palestine?
The Arabs were not morons, but simply had no interest in war, with anyone, much less bucking what the US wanted.
Palestine legally existed in 1920 by the Allies and Axis powers signing the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres.
You're lying.
There were not to be any Jewish involvement in the government of Palestine.
What government of Palestine?
What do you think the British Mandate for Palestine was, if not to help the Palestinians for a government?
There certainly was no possible legitimacy for a Zionist government since the Zionists were all illegal immigrants without any historic ties to the Mideast at all.
Ashkenazi come from Poland and Russia, not the Mideast.
They have no more Mideast DNA than Hitler did.
