The Nuking of Nagasaki: Even More Immoral and Unnecessary than Hiroshima

On the same grounds you dismiss 7 generals and admirals
Well... the grounds I mentioned were that the generals were covering their asses for possible war crime charges and the generals were trying to get the president to commit to an invasion of Japan. What was the Emperor's reason?
 
Because he would have to admit he lost a conventional war. He was supposed to be a semi deity and could not win a conventional war
But Japan didn't lose a conventional war. They lost a nuclear war. You might have heard about that in the news. We dropped two nukes on them and then they surrendered unconditionally.
 
Not according to our military leaders.
Your logic is staggering. Two nukes - the likes of which were never seen before - unleashing devastating destruction isn't enough for Japan to surrender but the mere thought of the Russians are coming did.
 
Not according to our military leaders.
Actually that's not according to our military leaders. What they said was that we could get Japan to surrender unconditionally without dropping nukes. The generals did not say Japan surrendered because of Russia.
 
According to historian Richard B. Frank,

The intercepts of Japanese Imperial Army and Navy messages disclosed without exception that Japan's armed forces were determined to fight a final Armageddon battle in the homeland against an Allied invasion. The Japanese called this strategy Ketsu Go (Operation Decisive). It was founded on the premise that American morale was brittle and could be shattered by heavy losses in the initial invasion. American politicians would then gladly negotiate an end to the war far more generous than unconditional surrender.[61]
 
While some members of the civilian leadership did use covert diplomatic channels to attempt peace negotiation, they could not negotiate surrender or even a cease-fire. Japan could legally enter into a peace agreement only with the unanimous support of the Japanese cabinet, and in the summer of 1945, the Japanese Supreme War Council, consisting of representatives of the Army, the Navy, and the civilian government, could not reach a consensus on how to proceed.[60]

A political stalemate developed between the military and civilian leaders of Japan, the military increasingly determined to fight despite all costs and odds and the civilian leadership seeking a way to negotiate an end to the war. Further complicating the decision was the fact no cabinet could exist without the representative of the Imperial Japanese Army. This meant the Army or Navy could veto any decision by having its Minister resign, thus making them the most powerful posts on the SWC. In early August 1945, the cabinet was equally split between those who advocated an end to the war on one condition, the preservation of the kokutai, and those who insisted on three other conditions:[63]
 
That supports us not you
Agreed. He dismissed the emperor's statement saying the emperor used the nukes to save face from being afraid of Russians. Which is silly. Japan and Russia have been at war for as long time.

What he can't dismiss thou are the intercepts....

According to historian Richard B. Frank,

The intercepts of Japanese Imperial Army and Navy messages disclosed without exception that Japan's armed forces were determined to fight a final Armageddon battle in the homeland against an Allied invasion. The Japanese called this strategy Ketsu Go (Operation Decisive). It was founded on the premise that American morale was brittle and could be shattered by heavy losses in the initial invasion. American politicians would then gladly negotiate an end to the war far more generous than unconditional surrender.[61]
 
In your opinion

Dismissed
You can't dismiss the intercepts.

According to historian Richard B. Frank,

The intercepts of Japanese Imperial Army and Navy messages disclosed without exception that Japan's armed forces were determined to fight a final Armageddon battle in the homeland against an Allied invasion. The Japanese called this strategy Ketsu Go (Operation Decisive). It was founded on the premise that American morale was brittle and could be shattered by heavy losses in the initial invasion. American politicians would then gladly negotiate an end to the war far more generous than unconditional surrender.[61]
 

Forum List

Back
Top