The Obama Economy is BOOMING!

[dcbl]

So why vote for anyone other than Hillary - right?

Oh wait - let's look at some facts, those pesky little things that always seem to get in the way of the narrative spoon fed to us by our friends on the left...

#NeverHillary

Retail Sales in U.S. Decline After January Revised Down

U.S. retail sales dropped in February and the prior month’s gain was revised to a decline, calling into question the narrative that bigger gains in consumer spending would propel economic growth at the start of 2016.

--

The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey called for a 0.2 percent drop in February, with estimates ranging from a decline of 0.7 percent to a 0.4 percent gain. January’s reading was initially reported as a 0.2 percent increase.

 

[jknowgood]

Oh my, after revealing the fact to liberals. You will be the racist of the day.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, it's been a good year to be in utilities and long bonds.

Looking at the bright side.
.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

I don't know if Hillary would be a good President or not. In the other thread, I was just giving my opinion about a particular incident, and no more than that. If a student had the gall to call Hillary "Monica", then she should be thrown out. I don't wish the incident to be true or not--I was giving my opinion about what should be done with obnoxious people.

 

[TNHarley]

The Obama Economy is BOOMING!
Depends on how low your standards are

 

[PoliticalChic]

So why vote for anyone other than Hillary - right?

Oh wait - let's look at some facts, those pesky little things that always seem to get in the way of the narrative spoon fed to us by our friends on the left...

#NeverHillary

Retail Sales in U.S. Decline After January Revised Down

U.S. retail sales dropped in February and the prior month’s gain was revised to a decline, calling into question the narrative that bigger gains in consumer spending would propel economic growth at the start of 2016.

--

The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey called for a 0.2 percent drop in February, with estimates ranging from a decline of 0.7 percent to a 0.4 percent gain. January’s reading was initially reported as a 0.2 percent increase.

And let me add this:

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." President Obama’s Growth Gap Hits $1.31 Trillion

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. "....first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth." Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire


The very worst President in terms of effectiveness....Well, maybe second to FDR.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Obviously Bush is to blame.

 

[edthecynic]

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years."

Just Slow & Steady growth under Obama, not the Boom & Bust economies of the Right.
And who benefits from B&B economies? The cash rich, who buy during the bust and sell at the boom.
And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.
So what kind of an economy do dumb clucks like PompousCheek want? B&B, of course, because fools never learn!

 

[dcbl]

And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.

That sounds great, except there are less good paying jobs, the number of people that are not even looking for work right now, or that are underemployed is staggering...

 

[TNHarley]

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years."

Just Slow & Steady growth under Obama, not the Boom & Bust economies of the Right.
And who benefits from B&B economies? The cash rich, who buy during the bust and sell at the boom.
And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.
So what kind of an economy do dumb clucks like PompousCheek want? B&B, of course, because fools never learn!

Tell me how "wage earners" benefit from artificial wages, part time and temporary jobs, amnesty, unfair trade etc? Ill wait

 

[Weatherman2020]

And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.

That why a record number of Americans are on welfare and need food stamps to survive?

 

[jknowgood]

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years."

Just Slow & Steady growth under Obama, not the Boom & Bust economies of the Right.
And who benefits from B&B economies? The cash rich, who buy during the bust and sell at the boom.
And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.
So what kind of an economy do dumb clucks like PompousCheek want? B&B, of course, because fools never learn!

Obama's economy has record number of people on welfare.

 

[jknowgood]

And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.

That why a record number of Americans are on welfare and need food stamps to survive?

Dang you beat me to it.

 

[RDD_1210]

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years."

Just Slow & Steady growth under Obama, not the Boom & Bust economies of the Right.
And who benefits from B&B economies? The cash rich, who buy during the bust and sell at the boom.
And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.
So what kind of an economy do dumb clucks like PompousCheek want? B&B, of course, because fools never learn!

Obama's economy has record number of people on welfare.

Which of Obama's policies cause that "record number of people on welfare". Be specific.

 

[jknowgood]

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years."

Just Slow & Steady growth under Obama, not the Boom & Bust economies of the Right.
And who benefits from B&B economies? The cash rich, who buy during the bust and sell at the boom.
And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.
So what kind of an economy do dumb clucks like PompousCheek want? B&B, of course, because fools never learn!

Obama's economy has record number of people on welfare.

Which of Obama's policies cause that "record number of people on welfare". Be specific.

One is obamacare which has put a record number of part time workers, that were at one time full time.

 

[Weatherman2020]

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years."

Just Slow & Steady growth under Obama, not the Boom & Bust economies of the Right.
And who benefits from B&B economies? The cash rich, who buy during the bust and sell at the boom.
And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.
So what kind of an economy do dumb clucks like PompousCheek want? B&B, of course, because fools never learn!

Obama's economy has record number of people on welfare.

Which of Obama's policies cause that "record number of people on welfare". Be specific.

Over regulations.
And don't give us the BS strawman the regulations save millions of puppies from dying a horrible death.

You look at what Reagan (who's degree was in economics) did and his never going below 3% growth and Obama (who's degree is in screwing people) who never exceeded 3% growth.

 

[RDD_1210]

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years."

Just Slow & Steady growth under Obama, not the Boom & Bust economies of the Right.
And who benefits from B&B economies? The cash rich, who buy during the bust and sell at the boom.
And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.
So what kind of an economy do dumb clucks like PompousCheek want? B&B, of course, because fools never learn!

Obama's economy has record number of people on welfare.

Which of Obama's policies cause that "record number of people on welfare". Be specific.

One is obamacare which has put a record number of part time workers, that were at one time full time.

How many people switched from full time to part time because of Obamacare? And how many of those wanted to make the change?

 

[Timmy]

Slanderous republicans invent obscure stats designed to make obama look bad .

Why? Cause the standard economic indicators are all looking good . They can't give him credit on anything .

What's next. " Avacado futures are at 2 year lows ! Obama is the worst !!!"

 

[edthecynic]

And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.

That sounds great, except there are less good paying jobs, the number of people that are not even looking for work right now, or that are underemployed is staggering...

The number of people not looking for work are directly related to an aging population and less school dropouts.
And the number working PT for economic reasons, the underemployed, is DECREASING!
What is "staggering" is you not knowing the facts.

 

[Weatherman2020]

1. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "...annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%.
By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years."

Just Slow & Steady growth under Obama, not the Boom & Bust economies of the Right.
And who benefits from B&B economies? The cash rich, who buy during the bust and sell at the boom.
And who benefits from S&S economies? Hard-working wage earners.
So what kind of an economy do dumb clucks like PompousCheek want? B&B, of course, because fools never learn!

Obama's economy has record number of people on welfare.

Which of Obama's policies cause that "record number of people on welfare". Be specific.

One is obamacare which has put a record number of part time workers, that were at one time full time.

How many people switched from full time to part time because of Obamacare? And how many of those wanted to make the change?

You tell us why a record number of Americans require welfare and food stamps.