lilburnjoe
Rookie
I just heard the Jury is requesting poker chips and 3 decks of cards !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The basic guidelines are:
If you start the assault (which does not have to include physical violence), you are the aggressor and have no right to self defense UNLESS...your victim escalates the level of force or tries to resume the fight after you make an attempt to leave. Then you do have a right to self defense.
Punching someone because you are paranoid is not self defense. Trayvon wasn't scared. Trayvon walked right up to George's truck. You'll find this out when the jury brings back it's verdict.
I wouldn't be so sure. I don't have faith in a jury in cases like this. I feel that they will look for something, anything to charge him with.
They may feel like they have to go the manslaughter route just to please the natives.
If somehow the killer, George Zimmerman, gets off Scot free, he's going to immediately start on the NRA circuit. He'll be a RW hero inviting to speak at all their events. He may even get hired by FOXNEWS.How many people have no problem living next to a "child killer"?
Regardless of the controversy, George Zimmerman killed what the law considers a "child". I suspect George will probably walk.
How many of his supporters would want him to actually live next door?
What if you have teenage children? Would you have any concern that he might kill one of them? If not, why not?
If he shot and killed Martin, what would keep him from doing the same to someone else's child?
If he did, would you still support him?
He'll be rich.
That's how they treat their criminals that get away...they prop them up. Google Darryl Issa. He's nothing but a small-time crook that got away.
How high do democrats hold Bill Ayers, or Ted Kennedy?
You are correct.
Maybe defense will use it against the State?
I find that incredible. He should be disbarred for such an outrage! Is there no law preventing state prosecutors from lying in order to obtain a conviction? Are they not under oath to tell the truth just like everyone else?
Shame!
the state had several lies and lies by omission as well as hiding evidence favorable to the
defense
plus the judge has erred on several points some serious
which will be reviewed after the conclusion of this trial
I find that incredible. He should be disbarred for such an outrage! Is there no law preventing state prosecutors from lying in order to obtain a conviction? Are they not under oath to tell the truth just like everyone else?
Shame!
the state had several lies and lies by omission as well as hiding evidence favorable to the
defense
plus the judge has erred on several points some serious
which will be reviewed after the conclusion of this trial
Reviewed by who? I don't think anything will come of it. Unless there's something Stamina can file and pursue.
The answer is yes.
If I call you an ignorant liberal douchebag, and you attack me for it and then I have to shoot you it is self-defense. I started it but you don't have the right to assault me for it.
How many people have no problem living next to a "child killer"?
Regardless of the controversy, George Zimmerman killed what the law considers a "child". I suspect George will probably walk.
How many of his supporters would want him to actually live next door?
What if you have teenage children? Would you have any concern that he might kill one of them? If not, why not?
If he shot and killed Martin, what would keep him from doing the same to someone else's child?
If he did, would you still support him?
People live next to you, don't they? You support abortions, you kill children.
The basic guidelines are:
If you start the assault (which does not have to include physical violence), you are the aggressor and have no right to self defense UNLESS...your victim escalates the level of force or tries to resume the fight after you make an attempt to leave. Then you do have a right to self defense.
Zimmerman was on his way back to his truck ( leaving ). Martin RETURNED to confront and fight.
the state had several lies and lies by omission as well as hiding evidence favorable to the
defense
plus the judge has erred on several points some serious
which will be reviewed after the conclusion of this trial
Reviewed by who? I don't think anything will come of it. Unless there's something Stamina can file and pursue.
The judiciary polices its own. They are taught in baby judge school when they don't know something to bluster and blow and fake it, so I don't think the judiciary will take her on. The voters might though.
The basic guidelines are:
If you start the assault (which does not have to include physical violence), you are the aggressor and have no right to self defense UNLESS...your victim escalates the level of force or tries to resume the fight after you make an attempt to leave. Then you do have a right to self defense.
Zimmerman was on his way back to his truck ( leaving ). Martin RETURNED to confront and fight.
Yes that's what he says... The one far-fetched narrative that would indeed make it self defense.
Why do you accept it as fact?
Punk ass ****** meets deserved end.
The end.
Next...
I love it when one of you guys shows the "honesty" of who you are. Good for you. You "represent".
That's MISTER "one of you guys" to you, bub.
How many people have no problem living next to a "child killer"?
Regardless of the controversy, George Zimmerman killed what the law considers a "child". I suspect George will probably walk.
How many of his supporters would want him to actually live next door?
What if you have teenage children? Would you have any concern that he might kill one of them? If not, why not?
If he shot and killed Martin, what would keep him from doing the same to someone else's child?
If he did, would you still support him?
Reviewed by who? I don't think anything will come of it. Unless there's something Stamina can file and pursue.
The judiciary polices its own. They are taught in baby judge school when they don't know something to bluster and blow and fake it, so I don't think the judiciary will take her on. The voters might though.
They're going into the circular file.
The judiciary polices its own. They are taught in baby judge school when they don't know something to bluster and blow and fake it, so I don't think the judiciary will take her on. The voters might though.
They're going into the circular file.
I'm sure of it. Maybe the voters will remember.