- Moderator
- #23,701
Is there evidence to suggest that he was a thug or wannabe thug ? If so then do people have it right when labeling like they do, be it by both sides like they were both doing on these two people caught in a whirlwind together ? I mean Zimmerman was labeled a white racist, when there is evidence that he tutored black children, and even defended blacks in a situation or something like that.Was Zimmerman wrong to assume a 17 year old was actually a criminal? Yes.
Did that justify Martin jumping him and beating the crap out of him? No.
You are right, it was preventable. Zimmerman could have stayed in his car, and Martin could have gone to his father's house. Both of them were wrong, and Martin will never learn from his mistake.
You left out what occurred between statement one and statement two.
Zimmerman essentially stalked Martin. A 17 yr old black youth being stalked by an unknown adult white man in a racially uneasy area.
Should he have jumped Zimmerman? No.
Was he afraid for his life? Quite possibly.
He made a bad decision in how to defend himself. Apparently.
Should he be blamed for that? No.
But he is. He is labeled a "thug".
Not really - mostly circumstantial and inconclusive, like with Zimmerman.
It's trial by media.