Thank you for the synopsis on what is at stake in this trial.
Assuming that a jury can be found that is entirely impartial and willing to hear both prosecution and defense cases then this case will depend largely upon the veracity of the only "witness" who was at the crime scene at the time. Since that is the person on trial it is going to be interesting to see if he takes the stand in his own defense.
If there is a single juror who is pro-NRA there will be a hung jury and then it will be up to the state to decide if they want to try again. In Florida the odds of this happening are pretty good so this is the most likely outcome in my humble opinion.
However if we assume that the jury is impartial then Zimmerman's credibility will be a crucial factor. In his favor is the lie detector but that can be nullified if the jury is presented with evidence that he is a habitual liar. Given that he lied to the judge earlier during the bail hearings that could count against him.
Personally I am hoping for the best but expecting the worst. The media circus is already ramping up the volume and that isn't going to help matters because whatever the outcome one group or another is going to be crying foul.
Not too many women are pro nra. I wonder if the nra has contributed to Z's defense fund. I wish they would ask him about it.
That would be irrelevant. And I know plenty of women who are avid shooters and NRA members. We put a lot of rabbit on the dinner table in these parts.
Rabbit? Do you know who you're talking to? I take umbrage with that.
Crusader Rabbit