Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only the judge and jury, not you, will decide that.There is no stalking involved.
Only the judge and jury, not you, will decide that.There is no stalking involved.
Only the judge and jury, not you, will decide that.There is no stalking involved.
Yes. Heaven forbid any of us use our brains and look at the evidence.
Not sure what you are referring to, but the neighbor that made the infamous 911 call took pictures of GZ within 3 minutes of the incident.I was in and out until CST so I don't know who showed the photos, but the witness that took the bloody nose photo immediately after? Was it a responder who took them or no?
The photos we are referring to are the actual crime scene photos...the one causing the questions is the picture of Trayvons body face down and arms to the side. This had to be taken before CPR was administered, so why is this person snapping pictures before CPR is administered and how is that person getting to the crime scene before a fist responder? For Gods sake...the police were already enroute with a head start...lol.
several years ago i had to do cpr on someone
there was around 20 other people present
and not one knew how to do it
or was too shocked to function
i had to actually appoint someone to call 9-1-1
Only the judge and jury, not you, will decide that.
Yes. Heaven forbid any of us use our brains and look at the evidence.
We are mere observers, Avatar. Yes, we have opinions and assumptions. But that is all.
A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree,
Now you are babbling. Go to bed and get a good night's sleep. This will all seem a bad dream in the morning.
Who is babbling? You can't even argue any of my points, just throwing pointless jabs at me.
You reveal a lack of self discipline and an inability to reflect on the nature of discussion. Your assumptions today underline both points.
Stay on topic, please.
Second, if you believe Martin was on top of Zimmerman beating his head against the ground, while Zimmerman was screaming for help, the case is over.
I don't believe that for a second. Drawing a gun and shooting doesn't take that long
So despite the eye witnesses, the forensics showing he was shot at close range, and the injuries to his person, you are going to conclude that Martin wasn't on top of Zimmerman beaing his head against the ground?
Yes. Heaven forbid any of us use our brains and look at the evidence.
We are mere observers, Avatar. Yes, we have opinions and assumptions. But that is all.
A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree,
That's the Florida Statute on Stalking. No one is even alleging that Zimmerman did that.
I don't believe that for a second. Drawing a gun and shooting doesn't take that long
So despite the eye witnesses, the forensics showing he was shot at close range, and the injuries to his person, you are going to conclude that Martin wasn't on top of Zimmerman beaing his head against the ground?
I've never disputed any of those things. My problem with this whole thing is that Zimmerman made a really stupid move and someone is dead because of it. He shouldn't get to walk because of a technicality.
I don't believe that for a second. Drawing a gun and shooting doesn't take that long
So despite the eye witnesses, the forensics showing he was shot at close range, and the injuries to his person, you are going to conclude that Martin wasn't on top of Zimmerman beaing his head against the ground?
I've never disputed any of those things. My problem with this whole thing is that Zimmerman made a really stupid move and someone is dead because of it. He shouldn't get to walk because of a technicality.
Who is babbling? You can't even argue any of my points, just throwing pointless jabs at me.
You reveal a lack of self discipline and an inability to reflect on the nature of discussion. Your assumptions today underline both points.
Stay on topic, please.
What are you talking about? You haven't even engaged me on the topic!
Self defense is lawful, moron.
Murder isn't. The jury has 2 options:
Stalking and murder? Or stalking and self-defense. Either way Zimmerman is no hero and should serve as a lesson to any dumbasses that think they should go out on patrol without any authorization.
Assume:
Makes an ASS out of U and ME. Keep thinking that.
We are mere observers, Avatar. Yes, we have opinions and assumptions. But that is all.
That's the Florida Statute on Stalking. No one is even alleging that Zimmerman did that.A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree,
You cut the full quote which negates your legal definition. Let me help you.
"We are mere observers, Avatar. Yes, we have opinions and assumptions. But that is all. "Stalking" does not need to be a charge but can be a behavior adduced to lead credence to the prosecution's charges."
You reveal a lack of self discipline and an inability to reflect on the nature of discussion. Your assumptions today underline both points.
Stay on topic, please.
What are you talking about? You haven't even engaged me on the topic!
The fact that you are now trolling and babbling on demonstrates that you cannot discuss the topic. First note of your trolling.
They like to ignore the fact that he didn't just punch him. He punched him, got him on the ground, and was whaling the living shit out of him, while Zimmerman BEGGED people to help him.
They didn't, and he killed the little turd before the little turd killed him. That's why people carry guns.
Murder isn't. The jury has 2 options:
Stalking and murder? Or stalking and self-defense. Either way Zimmerman is no hero and should serve as a lesson to any dumbasses that think they should go out on patrol without any authorization.
Assume:
Makes an ASS out of U and ME. Keep thinking that.
haHA! Out of you AND me! Tis a crazy game we play Mr. Kormac!
We are mere observers, Avatar. Yes, we have opinions and assumptions. But that is all.
A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree,
That's the Florida Statute on Stalking. No one is even alleging that Zimmerman did that.
You cut the full quote which negates your legal definition. Let me help you.
"We are mere observers, Avatar. Yes, we have opinions and assumptions. But that is all. "Stalking" does not need to be a charge but can be a behavior adduced to lead credence to the prosecution's charges."
