Zona
A guy in ariZONA
What happened to the "Zimmerman is a racist" Fan Club?
Where is the proof of that?
Wait a minute, Zimmerman did tell a N joke in 1999 SO HE HAS TO BE A RACIST.
Convicted, 20 years to serve.
Really? Link?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What happened to the "Zimmerman is a racist" Fan Club?
Where is the proof of that?
Wait a minute, Zimmerman did tell a N joke in 1999 SO HE HAS TO BE A RACIST.
Convicted, 20 years to serve.
LOL, emo! What 'hypocrisy' are you referring to?Is there a difference between Hernandez and zimmerman that makes you think that there's some selective 'outrage'?
BOTH OF THEM ARE HISPANIC!!! THE PEOPLE THEY KILLED WERE BLACK!! One was a football star, and nobody cared. One is a neighborhood watch volunteer, and he's under more scrutiny than Fort Knox! Can you not see that you brain-dead oaf?! The hypocrisy is astounding! These two cases are nearly identical. But nobody is politicizing what Aaron Hernandez did.
Why no outrage, liberal?![]()
Remember when the defense asked the star witness..."What does wet grass sound like?"They were rolling around on the grass during the fight.You have an eye witness with Martin on top "pounding" Zimmerman and we have posters here THAT REFUSE to lend any credibility to that witness WHATSOEVER.
Marc, Phoenix, Sarah and others TOTALLY IGNORE that witness testimony.
Because they are biased, unobjective citizens with their heads in the sand.
Martin was black and dead and Zimmerman is white and whitey has to pay.
That is what this boils down to.
And it makes me sick that many are still so blind and will NOT LOOK at EYE WITNESS testimony.
At one point, Zimmerman was on top, at another Trayvon.
They were fighting, we know that.
So what!?!?
You are making it up as you go Marc.
Show us where there is ANY testimony that they were rolling around and Zimmerman WAS EVER on top of Martin.
Where is it?
Under your scenario either of them could have pulled a gun and shot the other and under Florida Law NOT GUILTY of murder.
That is using your scenario.
General Rule of Thumb: You do not get to shoot someone because they hit you.
really? that is not what the law says, though
Remember when the defense asked the star witness..."What does wet grass sound like?"They were rolling around on the grass during the fight.
At one point, Zimmerman was on top, at another Trayvon.
They were fighting, we know that.
So what!?!?
You are making it up as you go Marc.
Show us where there is ANY testimony that they were rolling around and Zimmerman WAS EVER on top of Martin.
Where is it?
Under your scenario either of them could have pulled a gun and shot the other and under Florida Law NOT GUILTY of murder.
That is using your scenario.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO0ZWxNlIsY]What does wet grass sound like? Zimmerman Trial - YouTube[/ame]
Yep, Martin tried to avoid him and zimmerman repeatedly followed him that night.
That's the saddest part of this. Zimmerman SAID Martin had run away from him and he had to hunt him down a second time.
I wish they'd put him on the stand because he has lied and changed his story several times. But, that's also why they won't.
Martin's girl friend testified on this and confirms completely that Trayvon told her he had lost Zimmerman at one point.
Sorry this ain't working out for you.
Want me to make up a theory for GZ's case? I promise it won't be boring.At this point in the trial, any reasonable thinking adult should be able to honestly look at the perception that both individuals had of each other that night. A reasonable person should be able to do this and continue to keep their theory of the case in its totalitly in tact.
If you cannot do that, if you allow your privy to hindsight information now to establish an opinion of how it would have been that night without the benefit of such information, then you are not being real, you are showing an obvious bias, fully willing to give your established opinon the benefit of the doubt while dismissing the same benefit to the other side.
This is rampant in this forum from both sides...ask me...Ive been on both sides of the issue and frankly I still am. Both sides add, skip, speculate, makeup and refuse to even make a tiny attempt to rationalize the other side...nope they stick to their guns and their opinion and anything less makes them feel like a sell out...speculation and conjecture are the popular words. Theirs is evidence and reasonable and yours is conjecture and speculation...gimme a break...almost everything that comes out of GZs mouth that we didnt hear specifically in the 911 tape is specualtion, conjecture and hearsay with only one side being alive to tell it. Try to think for the dead guy for once and stop being so boring.
Anyone notice GZ's best friend doing a complete slop sweat thing? Jeezus.. He's nervous about something..
GZ says TM was smothering him just before he shot TM. Yet there is no DNA evidence of that, and the audio supposedly had GZ screaming just before the shot. How do you scream while you are being smothered to death? I don't get it and the investigator did not get it either:
4:06 p.m. ET: I cant pinpoint where you were smothered, thats the problem Im having, said Serino. "We dont hear him at all either. Is he being quiet? Is he whispering? Is he calm?"
You dream up a stupid theory & now you are an DNA expert?
Serino said he believed Zimmerman, case closed!
bad deflection attempt... where's the meds, the calls of racism, the negging?
The dna evidence was provided earlier in the trial... the proposal is just as probable as Zimmerman's story. Serino said he's either telling the truth or a pathological liar. We now know for sure that GZ is in fact a pathological liar.
Not sure what the motorcycle avie thing is about...but I thought I would join in the party. Like my new look?
That's the saddest part of this. Zimmerman SAID Martin had run away from him and he had to hunt him down a second time.
I wish they'd put him on the stand because he has lied and changed his story several times. But, that's also why they won't.
Martin's girl friend testified on this and confirms completely that Trayvon told her he had lost Zimmerman at one point.
Sorry this ain't working out for you.
EXACTLY.
Trayvon had gotten away from Zimmerman and Zimmerman hunted him down a second time.
That's the saddest part of this. Zimmerman SAID Martin had run away from him and he had to hunt him down a second time.
I wish they'd put him on the stand because he has lied and changed his story several times. But, that's also why they won't.
Martin's girl friend testified on this and confirms completely that Trayvon told her he had lost Zimmerman at one point.
Sorry this ain't working out for you.
EXACTLY.
Trayvon had gotten away from Zimmerman and Zimmerman hunted him down a second time.
Well the lead detective did testify under cross today that Zimmerman showed no anger about Traayvon in his interviews and that Z's story had very few inconsistencies.
Anger? Zim was to proud of what he had done in gods name to be angry.
link
Want me to make up a theory for GZ's case? I promise it won't be boring.At this point in the trial, any reasonable thinking adult should be able to honestly look at the perception that both individuals had of each other that night. A reasonable person should be able to do this and continue to keep their theory of the case in its totalitly in tact.
If you cannot do that, if you allow your privy to hindsight information now to establish an opinion of how it would have been that night without the benefit of such information, then you are not being real, you are showing an obvious bias, fully willing to give your established opinon the benefit of the doubt while dismissing the same benefit to the other side.
This is rampant in this forum from both sides...ask me...Ive been on both sides of the issue and frankly I still am. Both sides add, skip, speculate, makeup and refuse to even make a tiny attempt to rationalize the other side...nope they stick to their guns and their opinion and anything less makes them feel like a sell out...speculation and conjecture are the popular words. Theirs is evidence and reasonable and yours is conjecture and speculation...gimme a break...almost everything that comes out of GZs mouth that we didnt hear specifically in the 911 tape is specualtion, conjecture and hearsay with only one side being alive to tell it. Try to think for the dead guy for once and stop being so boring.
I keep my kid out of the neighbor's windows...I wonder how some people with such a cavalier attitude like the above would react if their child was killed by a "bad neighborhood watch leader"?
I keep my kid out of the neighbor's windows and doesn't get suspended for having weed in school.
This hasn't been established as fact. Just more lies from the killer, George Zimmerman.
and doesn't get suspended for having weed in school.
WTF does this have to do with the case?
Shall we bring up the wife-beating, cop-fighting Zimmerman's past as well?
It's irrelevant. Zimmerman sustained injuries from a physical attack by Martin. Anyone would have been fearful under those circumstances. Thus Zimmerman was justified in using deadly force.The very same Valerie Rao who did this? Who contributed nothing significant to the case? You're taking her seriously?
Those are allegations. I didn't see where they stated that she wasn't qualified to do the job.
Not sure what the motorcycle avie thing is about...but I thought I would join in the party. Like my new look?
Where's your bike?
25 decided he wanted to be taken seriously so he changed his avatar to a Harley. Not one he actually know how to ride, but a Harley just the same.
I've tried to tell him that the avatar isn't what causes a man to be taken seriously, but well, you know 25...