Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So far, zimmerman has not testified.
the evidence supports zimmermans head in contact with the ground.
grabbed, punched, slapped .... the head was put in contact with the ground. Severity is of the injuries is not what is in question.
all mr dna is doing is saying they were in contact with each other.
That's correct.
And one way to interpret the injuries is that Zimmerman was hit in the face and fell backwards on the concrete, which caused the abrasions.
The forensic pathologist testified that she felt that there were 3 times that Zimmerman's head may have hit the concrete but no more than six times. All of the injuries were insignificant. Thus it seems that Zimmerman's head made contact as a result of punches or slaps..but was never deliberately "slammed" into the concrete.
That is a very serious inconsistency with Zimmerman's recollection of events.
punched, slapped or grabbed... its still martin sitting on top of him dont all of that.
ANd the witness drones on... and on... and on... and on.
At the rate this is going, the state's defense team will rest their case sometime around Labor Day.
Let him run the clock out for today.
This is a good place to leave it with the jury for the day off.
Somewhere in stained shirt and jacket land.
........Sukshine
Ummm.
What are those two little yellow bally things doing?
making up?
Americans consider blacks more likely to be racist than whites and Hispanics in this country.
Thirty-seven percent (37%) of American Adults think most black Americans are racist, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Just 15% consider most white Americans racist, while 18% say the same of most Hispanic Americans.
There is a huge ideological difference on this topic. Among conservative Americans, 49% consider most blacks racist, and only 12% see most whites that way. Among liberal voters, 27% see most white Americans as racist, and 21% say the same about black Americans.
From a partisan perspective, 49% of Republicans see most black Americans as racist, along with 36% of unaffiliated adults and 29% of Democrats.
Among black Americans, 31% think most blacks are racist, while 24% consider most whites racist and 15% view most Hispanics that way.
Among white adults, 10% think most white Americans are racist; 38% believe most blacks are racist, and 17% say most Hispanics are racist.
That's correct.
And one way to interpret the injuries is that Zimmerman was hit in the face and fell backwards on the concrete, which caused the abrasions.
The forensic pathologist testified that she felt that there were 3 times that Zimmerman's head may have hit the concrete but no more than six times. All of the injuries were insignificant. Thus it seems that Zimmerman's head made contact as a result of punches or slaps..but was never deliberately "slammed" into the concrete.
That is a very serious inconsistency with Zimmerman's recollection of events.
punched, slapped or grabbed... its still martin sitting on top of him dont all of that.
Zimmerman is in a unique position here..he's already admitted to fatally shooting another human being.
That's generally held as illegal.
And the standard for "self defense" is pretty high, since Martin was unarmed and not involved in any crime.
There are several very key points in his statement that are unsupported by the evidence.
Most importantly that his life was in danger.
ANd the witness drones on... and on... and on... and on.
At the rate this is going, the state's defense team will rest their case sometime around Labor Day.
Let him run the clock out for today.
This is a good place to leave it with the jury for the day off.
Somewhere in stained shirt and jacket land.
The judge seemed fairly eager for the State to wrap it up today, possibly Friday. I think court will run a little later than usual tonight.
Nice deflection.. SCOTUS... ROFL
So you conduct yourself inversely to SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) case law?
Are you posting from jail or the poorhouse?
Your inability to deal with my posting relevant fact is not a deflection.
Sorry. I just thought the statement SCOTUS law defines right & wrong was funny. I thought their job, primarily, was to determine the constitutionality of federal and state laws. Right and wrong... not so much.
Right, it doesn't really tell us anything. And apparently Zimmerman "found" him again.
zimmerman has injuries, regardless of now minor consistent with his version of events.
an eye witness puts martin on top beating up on the person under him.
But that doesn't mean that Martin started the fight, if true. It merely means that at one point in time Martin may have had the upper hand in defending himself.
it also does not mean that zimmmerman started the fight.
911 tapes clearly state that zimmerman said he "lost him"
Let him run the clock out for today.
This is a good place to leave it with the jury for the day off.
Somewhere in stained shirt and jacket land.
The judge seemed fairly eager for the State to wrap it up today, possibly Friday. I think court will run a little later than usual tonight.
The court camera just flashed a shot of the jury...
punched, slapped or grabbed... its still martin sitting on top of him dont all of that.
Zimmerman is in a unique position here..he's already admitted to fatally shooting another human being.
That's generally held as illegal.
And the standard for "self defense" is pretty high, since Martin was unarmed and not involved in any crime.
There are several very key points in his statement that are unsupported by the evidence.
Most importantly that his life was in danger.
you can also argue that gz was standing his ground.
It does not matter if any of us think his life was in danger. What is going to matter is if gz thought his life was in danger.
having someone sitting on top of you beating you up and grabbing for the gun.....
you tell me if you would "think" your life is in danger at the time.
i know i would think that in the moment it was all happening.
Well...he did say he had a really bad memory, which is why he had to get out of his car and "look for a street sign."That wasn't in Zimmerman's statement.
No, so the guy must be lying and his testimony should be discounted.
No.
Zimmerman may have told him that.
Which further illustrates that Zimmerman's recall is in question.
Right, it doesn't really tell us anything. And apparently Zimmerman "found" him again.But that doesn't mean that Martin started the fight, if true. It merely means that at one point in time Martin may have had the upper hand in defending himself.
it also does not mean that zimmmerman started the fight.
911 tapes clearly state that zimmerman said he "lost him"
Right, it doesn't really tell us anything. And apparently Zimmerman "found" him again.it also does not mean that zimmmerman started the fight.
911 tapes clearly state that zimmerman said he "lost him"
you can also argue that martin found zimmerman and attacked.
Well...he did say he had a really bad memory, which is why he had to get out of his car and "look for a street sign."No, so the guy must be lying and his testimony should be discounted.
No.
Zimmerman may have told him that.
Which further illustrates that Zimmerman's recall is in question.
And where no street signs exist.Well...he did say he had a really bad memory, which is why he had to get out of his car and "look for a street sign."No.
Zimmerman may have told him that.
Which further illustrates that Zimmerman's recall is in question.
Which also makes no sense.
Instead of looking for a street sign on the well lit part of where he was, he chooses to cross a dark courtyard wear a "dangerous individual" may be lurking.
Nice deflection.. SCOTUS... ROFL
So you conduct yourself inversely to SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) case law?
Are you posting from jail or the poorhouse?
Your inability to deal with my posting relevant fact is not a deflection.
Sorry. I just thought the statement SCOTUS law defines right & wrong was funny. I thought their job, primarily, was to determine the constitutionality of federal and state laws. Right and wrong... not so much.
