The Official Zimmerman Trial Verdict Thread

[Rat in the Hat]

That smug bitch judge needs to be removed from the bench NOW!

Oh man, what happened Rat?

She had a nasty smirk on her face when she denied M O'M's objection to the state tag-teaming their closing arguments.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Jury will be excused. Will hold the hearing on Mr. Donelly's testimony.

 

[testarosa]

That smug bitch judge needs to be removed from the bench NOW!

Oh man, what happened Rat?

He's feeling the injustice. We've been trying to prop him up and cover for him.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Of course it would.

Can you be more specific? Wouldn't you agree that GZ is at least a loser? You'd have to be to follow people around to try and feel self-important and spend half of your adult life calling the police on people for any reason.

In a time of apathy and selfishness, someone cares enough about the neighborhood that they live in to volunteer their time to try and keep that neighborhood safe by joining a Neighborhood Watch, but you call him a "loser"? What makes George Zimmerman a loser in your eyes? The fact that he cared? That's the OPPOSITE of a sociopath!

I didn't call him a loser.

 

[testarosa]

Mr. Stamina is trying to save some time ? Why ? This is the REAL mystery here.

There was someone else he needed to depose last night too.

I think there was trouble this morning over last night.

Everyone is walking on contempt eggshells.

He's Mr. Stamina--time is meaningless.

True dat baby

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

It's common for criminals to come up with an elaborate story to cover their crimes and those stories are invariably "consistent."

Who's the criminal? Zimmerman was well within his right of self defense. Asshole.

I believe Quick is explaining his own view of this case. He (Quick) has created a narrative and is sticking with it.

If he's guilty then he lied. That can't be more evident.

 

[Edgetho]

Haha, turns out there WILL BE no rebuttal witnesses!

Score!

I thought the State was still looking for the ATF Agent?

No?

 

[SantaFeWay]

Oh Yay...Baboon-face is up

 

[IlarMeilyr]

STATE persecutors: We want "provoked" to be defined as "anything done by the defendant that might rile up anybody."

O'M: Apparently wants to go with at least one piece of case law that appears to have "defined" "provoked" in a more rational fashion.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Haha, turns out there WILL BE no rebuttal witnesses!

Score!

I thought the State was still looking for the ATF Agent?

No?

Looking less and less likely that the State will call anybody. Mr. Pollack was the foundation for any further argument they had...

 

[testarosa]

This is pointless - even if that testimony is stricken the bell was rung.

 

[dilloduck]

damn--he is a baboon face. good call Santa

 

[Rat in the Hat]

A$$ is trying to get all the defense witnesses thrown out.

Judge Mope will probably agree.

 

[Mertex]

Apparently Mertex's comprehension challenges extend to recognizing sarcasm too, but whatcha gonna do?

There's a thin line between sarcasm and bigotry. I don't think you fool anyone.

On an unrelated note, he's still too much of a pussy to acknowledge he was full of shit when he claimed that Zimmerman said blacks always get away.

That's what was aired on a tape. That you don't want to admit it is because most racist claim denial when confronted.

But nobody ever said pusillanimity and ignorance are mutually exclusive.

Bigotry and ignorance go hand in hand, as you have so positively proven.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Mr. West thinks this is all hilarious.

 

[dilloduck]

This is pointless - even if that testimony is stricken the bell was rung.

Mama Angela is watching

 

[MarcATL]

If his defense stands up to cross examination then not guilty slam dunk.
I do not fault the defense for not putting him up.
This is not about ME but the jury. It may hurt him as there may be jurors that need to hear his side of this subject to cross.
I believe he does not need to testify but have spoken with many jurors that wanted to hear the defendant say his side live.

As a layman, I understand that the accused seldom takes the stand in a murder trial unless the Defense is in serious dog doo-doo

Yea, but in this case there's an additional reason. If Z testifies among the train wreck of the explanations he's already given, the jury will see first hand how peculiar his character is.

And how much of a pathological liar he is as well.

As a layman, I understand that the accused seldom takes the stand in a murder trial unless the Defense is in serious dog doo-doo

Yea, but in this case there's an additional reason. If Z testifies among the train wreck of the explanations he's already given, the jury will see first hand how peculiar his character is.

"Train wreck" That's good. The only train wreck here is the prosecution's case. Zimmerman has been pretty consistent.

Yeah, he's been consistently lying.

 

[R.D.]

Go ahead strike it. The jury will think you're a bully Donnellys testimony was heartfelt and believable

 

[Zona]

Zimmerman gets 25 years for killing an unarmed child. We can dream.

 

[testarosa]

Go ahead strike it. The jury will think you're a bully Donnellys testimony was heartfelt and believable

Layer that on top of being told here's the rebuttal! then no rebuttals - hopefully those women are smart enough to pick up what's being put down as far as that goes. Women ain't dat dum