The only gun control needed.

rustic wrote: Drop in the ocean compared to real crime, look up black on black crime.

But that is exactly what contributes to real crime...

... black on black and otherwise.
 
Buying a gun from another individual requires no background check...

... that is how criminals are able to circumvent the process...

... want ads are full of people wanting to sell guns.

Yet few crimes are committed from people who bought guns from those wishing to sell. Most stole their guns, bought hot guns, or otherwise found somebody to legally buy guns for them.
 
rustic wrote: Drop in the ocean compared to real crime, look up black on black crime.

But that is exactly what contributes to real crime...

... black on black and otherwise.
A few overpriced guns from gun shows are not ending up in gangbangers hands. Dumbass
 
Not from gun shows but from individuals hard up for quick cash.

It makes you wonder why they are so atimate about keeping that loophole open....are they worried that they may need some cash and want to keep the option open to arm dubious people?

This is one small step of many. Liberals can't be trusted, so with liberals, you have to start just as early as they do.
 
Is the nation suffering from national PTSD?
No more than usual, no.
Mass shootings from Newtown to San Bernardino are weighing ever more heavily on Americans
Umm, not really. They're horrific, but every shooting is horrific. These no more than the ones that came before, or the ones yet to come.

Looks to me like the only "new" development is that the press is having less and less luck getting people to shout in wrath.

And that has nothing to do with the shootings per se. Only that people are realizing the media is driving their reactions, and have decided not to play their game to generate headlines any more.

More and more people are opting to seek solutions that actually work, instead.

Only an idiot would think that. Basically the frequency has reduced the outrage; it's exactly the what the fundraisers at the NRA wanted--the atmosphere at least. Nobody is outraged any longer and the monies continue to pour in as they work hard to ramp up the fear factor.

What made Sandy Hook so painful was that it was 6 year olds. NRA executives had wives that were busting their balls to do something. When nothing was done, it sank in that our government was too entrenched to make any changes. Subsequent blood baths in Oregon, San Bernadino, Colorado, just dulled the senses. San Bernadino was unique because it was a Muslim and supposed ISIS involvement so it had some legs. But overall the public has moved on knowing that the Congress can offer nothing but thoughts and prayers to the victims of the NRA strategy.

Only an idiot would think that the public is blaming the media. Human nature is to express outrage at the outset of an issue then as it becomes the norm, the outrage disappears. Like when you discovered your kid dented your fender on Sunday, you were pissed. You're still not the same level of pissed on Tuesday and even less so on Friday.

Thank God we have a President that is actually doing something--as minor as it is--and is offering something other than thoughts and prayers to the victims.

What your President did was find an opportunity (once again) to use these poor souls to advance his political agenda. Even by his own admission these new policies won't do squat, but it's one step of many to try and get as close as he can to stomping on the Second amendment.

He also displayed his hatred in our system of government. When will you people wake up? We have a balance of power for a reason. Our founders designed it that way so people like DumBama can't overtake the entire government and make rules all by his lonesome.

What DumBama didn't realize however is the ammunition (excuse the pun) that he gave to us freedom loving gun owners. Now when terrible things happen, we will be here to remind everybody how his stupidity didn't solve one problem when it comes to guns, and that it only empowered the criminal element even more.

Yesssss! I couldn't have said it any better! :thup: In fact, I'm going to change my "thanks" into a "winner." :D
 
Is the nation suffering from national PTSD?
No more than usual, no.
Mass shootings from Newtown to San Bernardino are weighing ever more heavily on Americans
Umm, not really. They're horrific, but every shooting is horrific. These no more than the ones that came before, or the ones yet to come.

Looks to me like the only "new" development is that the press is having less and less luck getting people to shout in wrath.

And that has nothing to do with the shootings per se. Only that people are realizing the media is driving their reactions, and have decided not to play their game to generate headlines any more.

More and more people are opting to seek solutions that actually work, instead.

Only an idiot would think that. Basically the frequency has reduced the outrage; it's exactly the what the fundraisers at the NRA wanted--the atmosphere at least. Nobody is outraged any longer and the monies continue to pour in as they work hard to ramp up the fear factor.

What made Sandy Hook so painful was that it was 6 year olds. NRA executives had wives that were busting their balls to do something. When nothing was done, it sank in that our government was too entrenched to make any changes. Subsequent blood baths in Oregon, San Bernadino, Colorado, just dulled the senses. San Bernadino was unique because it was a Muslim and supposed ISIS involvement so it had some legs. But overall the public has moved on knowing that the Congress can offer nothing but thoughts and prayers to the victims of the NRA strategy.

Only an idiot would think that the public is blaming the media. Human nature is to express outrage at the outset of an issue then as it becomes the norm, the outrage disappears. Like when you discovered your kid dented your fender on Sunday, you were pissed. You're still not the same level of pissed on Tuesday and even less so on Friday.

Thank God we have a President that is actually doing something--as minor as it is--and is offering something other than thoughts and prayers to the victims.
Your big mistake is your thinking that everyone processes the world around them like you, we don't. You are highly emotionally driven and respond to emotional things, rising high and falling low. Your focus is on the NRA and guns when they are not the problem. obama's actions do nothing except make liberals feel good, and he did it for politics.

My opinions on gun control don't rise and fall when a nut lashes out at the world, we need to focus on the problem instead of attacking windmills. Rapidly deteriorating morals, unwillingness to separate the insane from society, the overuse of mind altering drugs, criminals, gangs, etc. We do little to nothing about those because the noise makers (people like you) are clueless.

Even though I usually think you are a total dickwad, that's a great post!

Just ask them where does it end? What "reasonable measures" are they going to want to take after the next psycho uses a gun to carry out his madman fantasies? Isn't it obvious to them YET that none of these measures have been successful?
 
Not from gun shows but from individuals hard up for quick cash.

It makes you wonder why they are so atimate about keeping that loophole open....are they worried that they may need some cash and want to keep the option open to arm dubious people?

This is one small step of many. Liberals can't be trusted, so with liberals, you have to start just as early as they do.

But you'll trust the guy who wants to buy a gun "off the record". Does a shit-for-brains moron like yourself stop for a split second and wonder why the guy is having to buy a gun without going through a background check?

Of course the answer is no. As long as its not your family members or anyone you know getting killed (yet), there is no need to wonder what he is going to be doing with the weapon...

Its basically why the society is in the situation it is...trust nobody regardless of how much sense they make if they look differently than you, worship differently, or have some objectional political views...sums up the GOP perfectly.
 
Not from gun shows but from individuals hard up for quick cash.

It makes you wonder why they are so atimate about keeping that loophole open....are they worried that they may need some cash and want to keep the option open to arm dubious people?

This is one small step of many. Liberals can't be trusted, so with liberals, you have to start just as early as they do.

But you'll trust the guy who wants to buy a gun "off the record". Does a shit-for-brains moron like yourself stop for a split second and wonder why the guy is having to buy a gun without going through a background check?

Of course the answer is no. As long as its not your family members or anyone you know getting killed (yet), there is no need to wonder what he is going to be doing with the weapon...

Its basically why the society is in the situation it is...trust nobody regardless of how much sense they make if they look differently than you, worship differently, or have some objectional political views...sums up the GOP perfectly.

And what "reasonable measures" are going to be next?
 
Not from gun shows but from individuals hard up for quick cash.

It makes you wonder why they are so atimate about keeping that loophole open....are they worried that they may need some cash and want to keep the option open to arm dubious people?

This is one small step of many. Liberals can't be trusted, so with liberals, you have to start just as early as they do.

But you'll trust the guy who wants to buy a gun "off the record". Does a shit-for-brains moron like yourself stop for a split second and wonder why the guy is having to buy a gun without going through a background check?

Of course the answer is no. As long as its not your family members or anyone you know getting killed (yet), there is no need to wonder what he is going to be doing with the weapon...

Its basically why the society is in the situation it is...trust nobody regardless of how much sense they make if they look differently than you, worship differently, or have some objectional political views...sums up the GOP perfectly.

And what "reasonable measures" are going to be next?

Limiting magazine and clip sizes so rampage killers will have to re-load. This gives people time to run and react and draw their own weaponry/return fire.

According to the multiple award winning series Frontline, the guy who tried to murder Gabby Gifford (the congresswoman from Arizona) had a 33 round clip on his Glock. He dropped his magazine while re-loading it and one of her aids grabbed it allowing the madman to be tackled and held until authorities showed up. Had he been limited to 5 bullets, people would still be alive.

It fits in the Constitution so there is no argument to be made on those grounds. It creates only a minor inconvenience for target shooters.
 
Not from gun shows but from individuals hard up for quick cash.

It makes you wonder why they are so atimate about keeping that loophole open....are they worried that they may need some cash and want to keep the option open to arm dubious people?

This is one small step of many. Liberals can't be trusted, so with liberals, you have to start just as early as they do.

But you'll trust the guy who wants to buy a gun "off the record". Does a shit-for-brains moron like yourself stop for a split second and wonder why the guy is having to buy a gun without going through a background check?

Of course the answer is no. As long as its not your family members or anyone you know getting killed (yet), there is no need to wonder what he is going to be doing with the weapon...

Its basically why the society is in the situation it is...trust nobody regardless of how much sense they make if they look differently than you, worship differently, or have some objectional political views...sums up the GOP perfectly.

And what "reasonable measures" are going to be next?

Limiting magazine and clip sizes so rampage killers will have to re-load. This gives people time to run and react and draw their own weaponry/return fire.

According to the multiple award winning series Frontline, the guy who tried to murder Gabby Gifford (the congresswoman from Arizona) had a 33 round clip on his Glock. He dropped his magazine while re-loading it and one of her aids grabbed it allowing the madman to be tackled and held until authorities showed up. Had he been limited to 5 bullets, people would still be alive.

It fits in the Constitution so there is no argument to be made on those grounds. It creates only a minor inconvenience for target shooters.

And when a murderer ignores your magazine limit laws? You are aware that murderers are not concerned with laws, aren't you?
 
Weapon on safe until needed, finger off trigger until ready to fire, and the round hits what I'm aiming at down range.

Haven't said this for a while, but this is a classic example of men seeing their peashooter as an extension of their wiener.

This post is more macho BS from the gun lovers and why most of us don;t buy this 'we want a gun to protect our family, it's our second amendment right <inserts BS, lame excuse here>..

Why can't all the gun-loving dorks admit that they like the sound a gun makes when fired, the smell of gun powder, and how they get a little stiffie when they hit the target/animal/person they are aiming at.
 
[

And when a murderer ignores your magazine limit laws? You are aware that murderers are not concerned with laws, aren't you?

You are aware that the vast majority of people don't get murdered right? Probably in excess of 99.999999999 percent of people die in other ways. So why worry about something that is almost never going to happen? Sounds like you live your life in fear...
 
[

And when a murderer ignores your magazine limit laws? You are aware that murderers are not concerned with laws, aren't you?

You are aware that the vast majority of people don't get murdered right? Probably in excess of 99.999999999 percent of people die in other ways. So why worry about something that is almost never going to happen? Sounds like you live your life in fear...

I'm not the one in support of useless redundant laws. MURDER is already illegal. It doesn't matter if you do it with a gun, a car, a wrench, a tire iron, whatever.
 
Weapon on safe until needed, finger off trigger until ready to fire, and the round hits what I'm aiming at down range.

Haven't said this for a while, but this is a classic example of men seeing their peashooter as an extension of their wiener.

This post is more macho BS from the gun lovers and why most of us don;t buy this 'we want a gun to protect our family, it's our second amendment right <inserts BS, lame excuse here>..

Why can't all the gun-loving dorks admit that they like the sound a gun makes when fired, the smell of gun powder, and how they get a little stiffie when they hit the target/animal/person they are aiming at.

What a retarded post. Do you have any points to make? Plenty of women are gun owners, smarty. It's a great equalizer.
 
[

And when a murderer ignores your magazine limit laws? You are aware that murderers are not concerned with laws, aren't you?

You are aware that the vast majority of people don't get murdered right? Probably in excess of 99.999999999 percent of people die in other ways. So why worry about something that is almost never going to happen? Sounds like you live your life in fear...

And what is your stance on this subject? Chime in please instead of making useless nonsensical comments.
 

Forum List

Back
Top