The other three juries…

[SweetSue92]

Have seen that the world does not end if you convict a former president.

So any hesitation they may have had in that area is gone

What juries? There are juries seated?

 

[candycorn]

Yeah, was Starr commissioned “just because” or did they have reason to start going after the Clinton’s? I’m not familiar with whitewater, that was before I started paying attention to politics.

In any case, we’re at a whole new level now.

You said that the GOP needs to start drilling into the personal lives of the Democrats. Starr’s charter was whitewater--an Arkansas land deal--that involve the Clintons . It ended up with Lewinsky.

So if you want to talk about “who fired the first shot” (I don’t by the way), the GOP has been getting all up in the democrat’s shit for decades.

 

[Rawley]

Well, if that is the case.....it goes to support th description of Joe Biden
being a.........well, a 'truth-teller'.

No?

No. A scumbag and the worst possible stain on the Presidency imaginable.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You said that the GOP needs to start drilling into the personal lives of the Democrats. Starr’s charter was whitewater--an Arkansas land deal--that involve the Clintons . It ended up with Lewinsky.

So if you want to talk about “who fired the first shot” (I don’t by the way), the GOP has been getting all up in the democrat’s shit for decades.

was whitewater investigation warranted and based on a sound legal theory?

Did Clinton not lie to Congress?

Those are a far cry from the railroading that the dems have been doing to Trump for almost 9 years.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Oh, don’t get me wrong, I agree with you that this is going to embolden the other juries, but I also support the “what goes around comes around” philosophy. I hope this awakens the republicans to start using these very same tactics on the left.

I think it would be better if republicans simply nominated non populist, non corrupt candidates that don't get in trouble with the law.

I know, crazy talk.

 

[candycorn]

was whitewater investigation warranted and based on a sound legal theory?

Investigations are always warranted if there are sound allegations made.

Did Clinton not lie to Congress?

I don’t recall.

Those are a far cry from the railroading that the dems have been doing to Trump for almost 9 years.

Railroading? He’s never seen the inside of a jailhouse dude.

The investigation started out about a land deal and ended up with investigators talking to someone who was, I think, 14 and lived 1200 miles away when the land deal took place.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I think it would be better if republicans simply nominated non populist, non corrupt candidates that don't get in trouble with the law.

I know, crazy talk.

It doesn’t matter what candidate the repubs nominate, the dems will go after them too.

If trump dropped out tomorrow, the next candidate to step up would find themselves under endless investigations, and would labeled “a trumper”.

It never ends.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

It doesn’t matter what candidate the repubs nominate, the dems will go after them too.

If trump dropped out tomorrow, the next candidate to step up would find themselves under endless investigations, and would labeled “a trumper”.

It never ends.

The orange bag O' shit not only embraced this sort of behavior, but ratcheted it up to 11. Democrats aren't the only ones guilty of this stuff.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Investigations are always warranted if there are sound allegations made.

I don’t recall.

Railroading? He’s never seen the inside of a jailhouse dude.

The investigation started out about a land deal and ended up with investigators talking to someone who was, I think, 14 and lived 1200 miles away when the land deal took place.

Investigations are always warranted if there are sound allegations made.

I agree, which is why what Bragg and James did was wrong.

I don’t recall.

Seriously? That’s what he was impeached over. It wasn’t for getting a knob job…

Railroading? He’s never seen the inside of a jailhouse dude.

Yep, railroading. The premeditated decision to engage in endless investigations until stormy Daniels fell into your lap. And I say that because I find it odd that Daniels decided to start pursuing this nda lawsuit during trumps campaign. Makes me wonder who put her up to it. Who prodded her to try and break this story in hopes of damaging Trump?

 

[ThisIsMe]

The orange bag O' shit not only embraced this sort of behavior, but ratcheted it up to 11. Democrats aren't the only ones guilty of this stuff.

I’m sure both sides have their dirty tricks..can’t deny that..

 

[candycorn]

I agree, which is why what Bragg and James did was wrong.

Doesn’t make sense.

Seriously? That’s what he was impeached over. It wasn’t for getting a knob job…

I really do not remember--it was like 30 years ago.

Yep, railroading. The premeditated decision to engage in endless investigations until stormy Daniels fell into your lap. And I say that because I find it odd that Daniels decided to start pursuing this nda lawsuit during trumps campaign.

Wow, really? Stormy knew she had something on the blob and exercises some leverage? Yeah, that is really out of character for a porn star. LOL

Makes me wonder who put her up to it. Who prodded her to try and break this story in hopes of damaging Trump?

I would imagine it didn’t take much imagination. She had an attorney named Avenatti at the time; a real scumbag who apparently wasn’t all that good an attorney.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Doesn’t make sense.

I really do not remember--it was like 30 years ago.

Wow, really? Stormy knew she had something on the blob and exercises some leverage? Yeah, that is really out of character for a porn star. LOL


I would imagine it didn’t take much imagination. She had an attorney named Avenatti at the time; a real scumbag who apparently wasn’t all that good an attorney.

Yeah but she could have used that leverage at any time. The alleged affair took place in 2006, she waits until October of 2016 to shop her story around. Just before the election. That’s either extortion on her part or someone in the dnc put her up to it.

 

[candycorn]

Yeah but she could have used that leverage at any time. The alleged affair took place in 2006, she waits until October of 2016 to shop her story around. Just before the election. That’s either extortion on her part or someone in the dnc put her up to it.

It was straight up extortion. Its unlikely the DNC would have set the figure so low.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I’m sure both sides have their dirty tricks..can’t deny that..

But you give way more shit about it to one particular party for reasons.

 

[ThisIsMe]

It was straight up extortion. Its unlikely the DNC would have set the figure so low.

Ok, so why isn’t she under indictment for extortion? Or, maybe we need to investigate it to find out if she acted on her own or if someone in the opposing campaign put her up to it.

We need answers!

 

[ThisIsMe]

But you give way more shit about it to one particular party for reasons.

Well yeah, you guys have enough arrows in your quiver that I don’t need to add to them..
However, the fact is, I DO criticize my own party for the things the do, maybe not often enough, but I do. Can you say the same?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Well yeah, you guys have enough arrows in your quiver that I don’t need to add to them..
However, the fact is, I DO criticize my own party for the things the do, maybe not often enough, but I do. Can you say the same?

I don't have a party. I criticize both.

 

[The Duke]

Your candidate has 34 felony convictions....

Your party is a joke, sister.

Your party lost thousands and thousands of voters with the New York Shamviction.

I have to wonder how many thousands of people have bailed on the Democrats in the past 2 days alone and will

continue to until November.

 

[candycorn]

Ok, so why isn’t she under indictment for extortion?

Trump could have filed a complaint. Instead...he cut her a check.

That should tell you something about your idol.

If he didn’t bang her...why did he pay her?

Or, maybe we need to investigate it to find out if she acted on her own or if someone in the opposing campaign put her up to it.

We need answers!

LOL...sure that is all the blob wants....more Stormy on the witness stand describing his junk. You know...the junk she never saw.

Bring it on!!!!

 

[ThisIsMe]

I don't have a party. I criticize both.

Hmm, perhaps we both don’t do it enough, but the truth is, I do go against the grain of those on the right.

Also, I too have a difficult time really aligning with a party, since I think “parties” inherently invite division. I always just say I “lean right”, in reference to the way I feel about Republican ideology.