The " Palestinian State" is DOA!

[Hollie]

Indeed, yes, Arabs-Moslems helped the British. And, indeed, the Arabs-Moslems were unable to manage their affairs and build a workable society.

Indeed, as then, now.

Britain, the world superpower of the time, attacking Palestinian civilians.

The Palestinians should have kicked their ass.

Yet they themselves helped Britain invade.

Jews did kick the asses of British occupiers to get independence, Arabs whined and attacked the Jews.
Arabs have no-one to blame for their own choices.

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

You forget what it was that the UN wanted to partition.

You forgot that there was a realization the Arabs-Moslems were incapable of accepting a state that included Jews as equals deserving equal rights.

 

[Kondor3]

The Palestinian State is not DOA.

The Palestinian State was stillborn.

It never drew a single breath, and never will.

 

[Kondor3]

...You forgot that there was a realization the Arabs-Moslems were incapable of accepting a state that included Jews as equals deserving equal rights.

Now, now... be fair...

You can't expect the Muzzies to forget 1300+ years of holding the Jews in Dhimmitude, and to accept their former second-classers as Equals.

Sounds a lot like the Jim Crow South used to be... with the Muzzies as the defeated Plantation Owner Class...

 

[USAF 2023]

The Palestinians do not want to change Palestine into a bantustan state.

A bantustan state? You are using words that appeal to emotions, but have no meaning in this context. What is a "bantustan" state? What would it look like? How is it different from a State state? (Don't be avoidant -- I understand the actual meaning of the word bantustan. I want to hear what you think it is in the context of Palestine.)

This will go over your head but I will post it anyway.

Yeah, yeah, you've posted that piece of BS a thousand times. When I tried to actually discuss several points with you -- you abandoned the conversation. (Typical).

I'm asking you a very specific question here. The implication of your post is that it is impossible for Palestine to be a normalized State. The implication is that the existence of Israel, in any form, somehow prevents Palestinian self-determination and that ANY Palestinian State will just be a "bantustan". You are therefore simply attempting to justify the deletion of the Israeli State.

Do I understand you correctly?

Israel could still exist. It is just that is would no longer be a racist state.

Israel is “ racist” with Arabs living there but a “ Palestinian State” with a No Israeli Allowed Policy isn’t? Typical Palestinian Mentality. Forgot; “Palestine “ does not exist.

 

[USAF 2023]

Indeed, the Arabs helped Britain win the war then Britain stabbed them in the back.

Indeed, yes, Arabs-Moslems helped the British. And, indeed, the Arabs-Moslems were unable to manage their affairs and build a workable society.

Indeed, as then, now.

Britain, the world superpower of the time, attacking Palestinian civilians.

The Palestinians should have kicked their ass.

Yet they themselves helped Britain invade.

Jews did kick the asses of British occupiers to get independence, Arabs whined and attacked the Jews.
Arabs have no-one to blame for their own choices.

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Palestinians do not want to change Palestine into a bantustan state.

A bantustan state? You are using words that appeal to emotions, but have no meaning in this context. What is a "bantustan" state? What would it look like? How is it different from a State state? (Don't be avoidant -- I understand the actual meaning of the word bantustan. I want to hear what you think it is in the context of Palestine.)

This will go over your head but I will post it anyway.

Yeah, yeah, you've posted that piece of BS a thousand times. When I tried to actually discuss several points with you -- you abandoned the conversation. (Typical).

I'm asking you a very specific question here. The implication of your post is that it is impossible for Palestine to be a normalized State. The implication is that the existence of Israel, in any form, somehow prevents Palestinian self-determination and that ANY Palestinian State will just be a "bantustan". You are therefore simply attempting to justify the deletion of the Israeli State.

Do I understand you correctly?

Israel could still exist. It is just that is would no longer be a racist state.

Israel is “ racist” with Arabs living there but a “ Palestinian State” with a No Israeli Allowed Policy isn’t? Typical Palestinian Mentality. Forgot; “Palestine “ does not exist.

Now all you have to do is convince millions of Palestinians that Palestine does not exist.

Good luck with that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed, yes, Arabs-Moslems helped the British. And, indeed, the Arabs-Moslems were unable to manage their affairs and build a workable society.

Indeed, as then, now.

Britain, the world superpower of the time, attacking Palestinian civilians.

The Palestinians should have kicked their ass.

Yet they themselves helped Britain invade.

Jews did kick the asses of British occupiers to get independence, Arabs whined and attacked the Jews.
Arabs have no-one to blame for their own choices.

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

 

[USAF 2023]

A bantustan state? You are using words that appeal to emotions, but have no meaning in this context. What is a "bantustan" state? What would it look like? How is it different from a State state? (Don't be avoidant -- I understand the actual meaning of the word bantustan. I want to hear what you think it is in the context of Palestine.)

This will go over your head but I will post it anyway.

Yeah, yeah, you've posted that piece of BS a thousand times. When I tried to actually discuss several points with you -- you abandoned the conversation. (Typical).

I'm asking you a very specific question here. The implication of your post is that it is impossible for Palestine to be a normalized State. The implication is that the existence of Israel, in any form, somehow prevents Palestinian self-determination and that ANY Palestinian State will just be a "bantustan". You are therefore simply attempting to justify the deletion of the Israeli State.

Do I understand you correctly?

Israel could still exist. It is just that is would no longer be a racist state.

Israel is “ racist” with Arabs living there but a “ Palestinian State” with a No Israeli Allowed Policy isn’t? Typical Palestinian Mentality. Forgot; “Palestine “ does not exist.

Now all you have to do is convince millions of Palestinians that Palestine does not exist.

Good luck with that.

All you have to do is convince Millions of Israelis that Israel does not exist, it’s “ racist” to have a Primarily Jewish Country with Arabsand Christians, yet it’s OK to have Palestine with a No Israelis allowed Policy. Good luck with that

 

[Hollie]

Britain, the world superpower of the time, attacking Palestinian civilians.

The Palestinians should have kicked their ass.

Yet they themselves helped Britain invade.

Jews did kick the asses of British occupiers to get independence, Arabs whined and attacked the Jews.
Arabs have no-one to blame for their own choices.

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Britain, the world superpower of the time, attacking Palestinian civilians.

The Palestinians should have kicked their ass.

Yet they themselves helped Britain invade.

Jews did kick the asses of British occupiers to get independence, Arabs whined and attacked the Jews.
Arabs have no-one to blame for their own choices.

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

You forget what it was that the UN wanted to partition.

You forgot that there was a realization the Arabs-Moslems were incapable of accepting a state that included Jews as equals deserving equal rights.

Every Country Has the Right to Deport Incompatible Elements

In 1948, the Sunni Moslem countries expelled all their Jews. So Israel has the right to expel all its Moslems.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Yet they themselves helped Britain invade.

Jews did kick the asses of British occupiers to get independence, Arabs whined and attacked the Jews.
Arabs have no-one to blame for their own choices.

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

El Cid Has Become El Sissy

Jihadi oil money is financing the secession of Catalonia. Until the Spaniards and French reconquer North Africa, their independence will be endangered. The best defense is a good offense.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Yet they themselves helped Britain invade.

Jews did kick the asses of British occupiers to get independence, Arabs whined and attacked the Jews.
Arabs have no-one to blame for their own choices.

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

 

[Sixties Fan]

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

Maybe not.

You have said:

Israel does not exist
The Israelis stole land
The Palestinian Arabs are the indigenous people of Palestine
The Jews are foreigners

Help us here. What else have you said which would basically say that Jews have no right to their ancient homeland, in any way, shape or form?

 

[Hollie]

A few things you are missing.
All during the Mandate, Britain allowed the Jews developed their military.
By 1939, Britain had the Palestinians disarmed and their leaders were expelled or killed.
Britain was broke and exhausted from WWII.

By 1948 it was a piece of cake for Israel's military to roll across Palestine expelling unarmed civilians.

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

Do you understand what you cut and paste?

 

[USAF 2023]

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

Maybe not.

You have said:

Israel does not exist
The Israelis stole land
The Palestinian Arabs are the indigenous people of Palestine
The Jews are foreigners

Help us here. What else have you said which would basically say that Jews have no right to their ancient homeland, in any way, shape or form?

All during the Mandate, the British put Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who started the riots against the Jews in 1920. Even if he was later wanted for those attacks and expelled, he continued to incite
Arabs against Jews, be it in the Mandate, or in Iraq - where the Faroud happened in 1941 because of him.

Are you seriously telling us that the Arabs in the Mandate did not build themselves an arsenal and use them against the Jews in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939 and continued to use them all the way to 1947 and 1948?

Are you seriously telling us that the Jews were supposed to just sit there unarmed and not buy weapons and then in 1936 start building themselves a military to deal not only with the Arabs but the British who went back on their word again because of Arab violence?

And you seem to be seriously saying that Israel, once Independent, decided to "roll across the Mandate of Palestine" and expel "unarmed civilians" instead of most of them fleeing at their Arab and Jordanian leaders, or expelled because they were attacking Jews with the guns they got since 1920.

Arabs have the right and must defend themselves against the Jews, but the Jews - the indigenous people - do not have the right to defend themselves since the first Arab attack on them in 1920.

Arabs have the right to attack and expel, but the Jews do not have the right to defense, and letting those who do not want to live in Israel peacefully go, since they started the 1948 war actually in November of 1947 after the UN recognized Israel as a country and the Arabs once again refused the partition because the other side was Jewish.

Muslims love to have their Jews under them.

Jews love to have the Muslims and Christians with them.


Maybe some day you will understand the difference.

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

Maybe not.

You have said:

Israel does not exist
The Israelis stole land
The Palestinian Arabs are the indigenous people of Palestine
The Jews are foreigners

Help us here. What else have you said which would basically say that Jews have no right to their ancient homeland, in any way, shape or form?

What is he claiming he never said? I can tell you one thing; He never condemned Abbas “ No Israelis Allowed” policy yet in his “ mind” that’s not racist

 

[Sixties Fan]

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

Maybe not.

You have said:

Israel does not exist
The Israelis stole land
The Palestinian Arabs are the indigenous people of Palestine
The Jews are foreigners

Help us here. What else have you said which would basically say that Jews have no right to their ancient homeland, in any way, shape or form?

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

Maybe not.

You have said:

Israel does not exist
The Israelis stole land
The Palestinian Arabs are the indigenous people of Palestine
The Jews are foreigners

Help us here. What else have you said which would basically say that Jews have no right to their ancient homeland, in any way, shape or form?

What is he claiming he never said? I can tell you one thing; He never condemned Abbas “ No Israelis Allowed” policy yet in his “ mind” that’s not racist

This:

"Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?"

I never said that.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

Maybe not.

You have said:

Israel does not exist
The Israelis stole land
The Palestinian Arabs are the indigenous people of Palestine
The Jews are foreigners

Help us here. What else have you said which would basically say that Jews have no right to their ancient homeland, in any way, shape or form?

The Palestinian forgot May 14, 1948

Of course not.

That is the day that Israel occupied Palestine.

Not true. You still cling to the false notion that the geographic area of Palestine was, and still is, an Islamist waqf. While that is what you are indoctrinated with at the mosque, those halcyon days of Islamist conquest and imposition of dhimmitude are long gone.

How is that reconquista of al-andalus going?

I never said that.

Maybe not.

You have said:

Israel does not exist
The Israelis stole land
The Palestinian Arabs are the indigenous people of Palestine
The Jews are foreigners

Help us here. What else have you said which would basically say that Jews have no right to their ancient homeland, in any way, shape or form?

What is he claiming he never said? I can tell you one thing; He never condemned Abbas “ No Israelis Allowed” policy yet in his “ mind” that’s not racist

Christian and Muslim polices of "No Jews/Israelis Allowed" has been going on for many centuries.

Habits never die when it comes to Christian and Muslim replacement policies.

England started expulsions in 1290 in Europe. The Muslims started it in 1920. No Jews are allowed to become sovereign over their own land. They cannot lose their scapegoat mascots.

 

[Shusha]

The Palestinian Mentality that Arabs can have a Jew-free country and not be racist while the Jewish State with full equality under the law for everyone is somehow racist is one of the more ridiculous claims.

 

[USAF 2023]

The Palestinian Mentality that Arabs can have a Jew-free country and not be racist while the Jewish State with full equality under the law for everyone is somehow racist is one of the more ridiculous claims.

Ask Tinmore to explain that “ logic” and there will be no response. It’s called the Palestinian Mentality.

 

[Shusha]

The Palestinian Mentality that Arabs can have a Jew-free country and not be racist while the Jewish State with full equality under the law for everyone is somehow racist is one of the more ridiculous claims.

Ask Tinmore to explain that “ logic” and there will be no response. It’s called the Palestinian Mentality.

He doesn't like to respond to my questions, and many other's questions. Too difficult, too awkward and exposes his hypocrisy.