jknowgood
Diamond Member
The way I look at it, if they mind their business and not attack me. Then they have zero chance of getting shot. If they choose to attack me, then they make me choose to shoot them. Mb chose to attack, so he made a bad decision and it cost him his life. He also chose to rob a store and assault the owner. Doesn't seem like he was making any good decisions that day.Well atleast I understand your frame of reference and your source for forming opinions. I doubt it will serve you very well as real life is not a video game, but hey continue living in fantasy landYeah, because if someone is attacking you, number one rule is to ask them if they have a gun before defending yourself.the idiot said he does not want justice for the officer that made the bastard good !! he said even if Brown assaulted the officer and charged the officer had no right to shoot him. most blacks and white liberals have the same point of view.
Dont shoot an unarmed person?....how terrible!
I hear ya...Sometimes when I play call of duty and someone attacks me with a knife I call in a Airstrike because I dont know what proportional means...oh and I dont have any police training
In a snide way I am talking about porportion.
See if someone hits me, then I shoot them...that reaction is not proportional.
Thats why this "defend yourself" line cannot be disagreed with but if you asked: If someone attacked you do you have the right to shoot them multiple times and possibly kill them?
Now the question is a little more detailed...ya know.
But as long as people make up scenarios where MB was some hulk like figure that can break people in half by mere touch and he used that touch on a poor helpless officer AND tried to take his gun AND turned around after running away to apparently charge a loaded gun being pointed at him like a bull (which no one does by the way)
Then oh my god....SHOOT AND KEEP FIRING!!!