The Real Choice on November 8th

[DGS49]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

 

[hazlnut]

Huh?

 

[owebo]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

 

[hazlnut]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

 

[PurpleOwl]

your only real choice is hillary clinton and thats the problem

 

[Fenton Lum]

The entire system is garbage, however it is operating exaclty as intended; the masses have the illusion of democratic representation with no meaningful input. As long as they can be kept seething at each other, the substantial people can cannibalize society at large at the expense of the many. Same as it ever was.

 

[hazlnut]

 

[owebo]

 

[Fenton Lum]

Partisanshitheads are what allows the dysfunctional system to prevail.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

I think the real choices are these.
1 Build a wall to stop illegal immigrants from entering this country, National ID for US citizens and the illegal felons get booted out of this country.
2 Prevent any and all Muslims from other countries from entering the US until this country can fix its own problems first.
3 Put welfare back like it was under Bill Clinton, where after 2 years it is cut off so you better find a job instead of sitting on your ass not even bothering to look for a job.


Other choice is
1 Keep letting future Democrat voters to cross the border eventually eliminating the white majority in the US but replace it with 3rd world nationals who don't give a rats ass about the country or environment, as shows with all the trash being thrown on the ground by them.
2. Keep bringing in Muslims(not Christians) from war torn countries that were caused by then ex secretary of state, who now wants to be president.
3. Give away everything for free(except someone has to pay for it with higher taxes, except her and her foundation) eventually creating more national debt left to her which she inherited from the 1st bi racial president who made unpatriotically 10 trillion more dollars(that he inherited 9 trillion dollars from the 1st 43 presidents combined). The choices are clear, want to be like Venezuela, vote for the vagina president. Don't want to be like Venezuela, vote for the guy president.

 

[BluesLegend]

OP must be a Johnson fan I guess.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Trump will willing release his taxes as soon as Hillary releases the 33,000 delete emails that she wipe clean off her hard drive. If she has nothing to hide, then why did she hide or delete all 33,000 emails? Crooked Hitlery. Crooked Obama, when Trump is president, Nuremburg Trials for the traitors to the country, if found guilty then they leave for Cuba or are given the guillotine.

 

[Auld Phart]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

 

[rightwinger]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

Hillary has more experience than any candidate since Daddy Bush

Hillary's experience as First lady alone gives her more experience than Reality Star Trump

 

[owebo]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

Hillary has more experience than any candidate since Daddy Bush

Hillary's experience as First lady alone gives her more experience than Reality Star Trump

You could say she was a great Secretary of Hate.....

 

[billyerock1991]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

View attachment 90308

 

[owebo]

Both Presidential candidates are human garbage. Neither one has shown any of the quality one would think of as INTEGRITY, at any time in this election cycle.


As for professional qualifications, while HRC has a lot of “government experience,” she has zero accomplishments to point to, despite years of trying. Trump has no “government experience,” but he has accumulated a lot of wealth, and that takes management ability, which HRC has never demonstrated.


Based on resumes, neither one would make it to the first interview for a meaningful executive position, and even if they got to the first interview, because of their horrible personalities their resumes would be in the trash can before they made it to the Exit sign.


So what do we have?


Trump’s policies, to the extent that they are discernable, either do, or purport to, benefit either the U.S. or Americans in general. For example,

• Reject and/or evict people who have come here illegally;
• use “profiling” and a very big stick to fight Islamic terrorism;
• don’t get into international conflicts unless the U.S. or NATO have a specific vital interest to protect;
• do everything you can to promote employment here in America, and to “punish” employers who “take jobs overseas.”
• Shun policies that are based on a pathetic desire not to offend anyone – ignore the practice of “political correctness.”

HRC’s policies, on the other hand, all seem to inure to the benefit of NON-Americans, or benefit one favored group at the expense of an un-favored group, or at the expense of EVERYONE ELSE. Examples:

• A “path to citizenship” for people who are here illegally. Who, exactly, does this benefit? Certainly not the American taxpayers who will have to pay for their food, shelter, healthcare, and schooling. The Democratic Party, which expects the votes of all of these largely wretched and dependent souls, will definitely benefit, which is all HRC cares about.

• “Free” college tuition. This benefits students AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE ELSE. And as with all socialist initiatives, it encourages foolish behavior.

• "Paid family medical leave,” benefits people who have children while employed, but as above, it is AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYBODY ELSE. Who pays that wage while the young parent is staying at home? Hillary doesn’t know, and she doesn’t care. But it’s the other employees who will have smaller raises, the owners of the company, the customers, and so forth. HRC, never having had a Real Job, couldn’t care less who pays for it.

• Higher minimum wage. Even ignoring the reduction in employment and reduced hours that this would cause, again one must ask, WHO PAYS FOR IT? Those dollars don’t materialize out of thin air. The owners, customers, and other employees must eat that extra cost.

• Support union and/or government employees (at the expense of everyone else).

And on and on. That’s the difference: Trump promotes policies that are in AMERICA’s best interests, and HRC promotes policies that will buy Democrat votes, regardless of whether they are good for the country or not.


Take your pick.

View attachment 90308

View attachment 90312 View attachment 90313

 

[Iceweasel]

your only real choice is hillary clinton and thats the problem

In which state?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

It still stuns me that she was elected in New York.

 

[Auld Phart]

When you start with HRC has no accomplishments and her decades of experience don't mean anything, you basically lose the argument right of the gate and look extremely foolish doing so -- like a race horse crapping on the track right before dropping dead at the starting line.

Better luck next time.

Decades of experience?

First Lady of Arkansas?
(no experience there)

First Lady of the US?
(no experience there either)

Carpetbagged from a red state to a blue state, because she, and Bill, knew she'd never get elected in Arkansas.

Secretary of State?

Consolation prize for not being able to beat a first term senator.

It still stuns me that she was elected in New York.

It wasn't Hillary Clinton running, it was the First Lady of the United States, with all the free advertising that came with that position.