Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, yes, the imbecility of the-guns-are-the-problem fallacy mouthed by lefty as he propagates degeneracy and lawlessness in popular culture and the state schools, indeed, as he marches through and tears down the civil and familiar institutions of civilization.Ah yes, the good old slippery slope fallacy. Again, this is really simple so pay attention. The drive to ban the assault weapon is not an attempt to stop crime or even the use of guns in crimes. It is merely an attempt to mitigate the damage from mass shootings, and perhaps cut down on their frequency. It is the simple response to a simple cost benefit analysis. Assault weapons provide little, if any benefit, to their ownership. Other guns can be used just as effectively, if not more effectively, than the assault rifle. Well, except for mass shootings, like children at elementary schools. The cost of their legality far exceeds any benefit they provide.
Ah yes, the good old slippery slope fallacy. Again, this is really simple so pay attention. The drive to ban the assault weapon is not an attempt to stop crime or even the use of guns in crimes. It is merely an attempt to mitigate the damage from mass shootings, and perhaps cut down on their frequency. It is the simple response to a simple cost benefit analysis. Assault weapons provide little, if any benefit, to their ownership. Other guns can be used just as effectively, if not more effectively, than the assault rifle. Well, except for mass shootings, like children at elementary schools. The cost of their legality far exceeds any benefit they provide.
From surada's link:
right----only from jews and other "untermenchen"I didn't say that. What's wrong with you? Conservatives often say Hitler and Nazis took away gun rights, but they didn't. Quite the opposite.
yes---the question is how. There is no question inIn case you haven't noticed, mass shootings, especially when they involve children, are much more heinous than the murders that happen throughout the country every day. It's easy to tell yourself "I'll never be in a position to become a part of the crime that causes so many deaths" For the vast majority of people that will be true. However, it's not so easy to watch innocent children die in piles. Most school shootings are done with military style rifles. that has to stop.
They're liars. That's why they do it.The vast majority of firearm crimes involve handguns, not anything like an AR-15. So why are Democrats targeting so called assault rifles?
Simple! Because the vast majority of firearm crimes involve handguns, not anything like an AR-15. It's all about strategy.
After they outlaw AR-15s, they'll wait until the next headline catching crime that involves a handgun, and point to the statistics to insist that now we have to outlaw handguns, too. They'll start talking about the "handgun loophole" and saying that they need to close it. They'll tell everyone that of course we have to outlaw handguns, saying that if the relatively small percentage of crime that involves a long gun was worthy of action, then the remaining 90% certainly warrants action.
Democrats aren't coming for your guns. Until they are.
so Biden either lied or he didnt know what he was talking about when he said no one needs to own a gun [9mm] that will blow the lung out of the body ? so which is it a lie or ignorance ?This is a lie; again, there is no ‘strategy’ to ban handguns.
I missed it-------what was the "useful" information?Thanks Surada for the link. As usual you provide sober and useful information. We may not always agree on every detail, but your contributions are appreciated.
Can’t say the same about most of your opponents here …
I am aware that we got M-16s in late June 1965 and Colt sent a team to Ft. Benning to demonstrate them.
Friend, the 1st Cavalry Division were issued M-16s in June and July 1965. We left for Vietnam Aug 13 with the M-16. We never had AR 15s. I know the history of both including the reduction of muzzle velocity and addition of a forward assist assembly.Those weren't M-16s. Those were what the AF were using, the AR-15 Model 601. It wasn't until the Army adopted the AR-15 that it was redesignated the M-16. In fact, the "M-16" I qualified in the AF on was stamped "AR-15 Model 601 (M-16). The M-16 stamp was added later sometime in 1968. The Army had not totally adopted the M-16 until early 1968. Until then, they were called AR-15 Model 601. When they were adopted, there were some changes where rails were added and some of the chromium plating was removed making the Model 602 an inferior weapon to the 601. Later on, the Chromium was readded. Between the poor powder, removing of some of the chromium plating and the removal of the cleaning kits, you Army types were screwed.
nope----not facetious----suradie did present theYou are being facetious, Irosie91. But in any case I was only referring to this link Surada provided, which actually presents many diverse views on German gun laws under Weimar and Nazi Germany.
Nazi gun control argument - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
The absurdity of analogies made between Nazi policies and the policies of today’s American liberals who support representative democracy (and more gun regulations) should imo be … self evident.
Wrong.Not for Jews, he didn't.
www.politifact.com
This is a lie; again, there is no ‘strategy’ to ban handguns.
...shall not be infringedThe vast majority of firearm crimes involve handguns, not anything like an AR-15. So why are Democrats targeting so called assault rifles?
Simple! Because the vast majority of firearm crimes involve handguns, not anything like an AR-15. It's all about strategy.
After they outlaw AR-15s, they'll wait until the next headline catching crime that involves a handgun, and point to the statistics to insist that now we have to outlaw handguns, too. They'll start talking about the "handgun loophole" and saying that they need to close it. They'll tell everyone that of course we have to outlaw handguns, saying that if the relatively small percentage of crime that involves a long gun was worthy of action, then the remaining 90% certainly warrants action.
Democrats aren't coming for your guns. Until they are.
Pololololoitifact.Wrong.
No, gun control regulation in Nazi Germany did not help advance the Holocaust
On March 13, 2018, gun control activists laid 7,000 pairs of shoes on the lawn outside the Capitol in D.C. to represent
The vast majority of firearm crimes involve handguns, not anything like an AR-15. So why are Democrats targeting so called assault rifles?
Simple! Because the vast majority of firearm crimes involve handguns, not anything like an AR-15. It's all about strategy.
After they outlaw AR-15s, they'll wait until the next headline catching crime that involves a handgun, and point to the statistics to insist that now we have to outlaw handguns, too. They'll start talking about the "handgun loophole" and saying that they need to close it. They'll tell everyone that of course we have to outlaw handguns, saying that if the relatively small percentage of crime that involves a long gun was worthy of action, then the remaining 90% certainly warrants action.
Democrats aren't coming for your guns. Until they are.
That might be the strategy of those at the top like Schumer, et al, but by and large it's shear ignorance. A lot of people on the left clamoring for a ban on AR-15s have never even seen nor fired one and many think they're automatic weapons. They don't even know what AR means. I've seen this play out on social media repeatedly.
Ah yes, the good old slippery slope fallacy. Again, this is really simple so pay attention. The drive to ban the assault weapon is not an attempt to stop crime or even the use of guns in crimes. It is merely an attempt to mitigate the damage from mass shootings, and perhaps cut down on their frequency. It is the simple response to a simple cost benefit analysis. Assault weapons provide little, if any benefit, to their ownership. Other guns can be used just as effectively, if not more effectively, than the assault rifle. Well, except for mass shootings, like children at elementary schools. The cost of their legality far exceeds any benefit they provide.
