oldsoul
Gold Member
Ok. How is forcing a baker to do something against their religious beliefs fighting for equality for anyone? Just an example, there are plenty more. I have not heard of even one left leaning person say that situation was wrong.Then maybe you can clear things up a bit. I said that if you fight for everyone's rights, everyone wins. You said it doesn't work that way. How have I gotten this wrong?Assuming a Zero sum.... I'll go with it though. If I exercise my right to free speech, for example, someone else has, by definition, been denied their right. Is that how it works?
Of course not
Why do conservatives suck at analogies?
Our rights are established in the Constitution and our laws
Everything else is public policy....taxes, expenditures on schools, military, healthcare, infrastructure, subsidies
All help some more than others
If we build more schools....it helps those who are raising children more than those without kids
What you call identity politicsI see it differently. Let me reword to demonstrate the difference:Our rights are established in the Constitution and our laws
Our rights are guaranteed by the constitution, which is the basis for our laws.
I trust you see the difference. It may seem trivial to some, but it is an important distinction to make. Your statement would lead one to believe that our rights come from government. My statement would lead one to believe that our rights come from somewhere else (ie. a higher authority, or God to some), and are only upheld (guaranteed) by the constitution. Furthermore, our rights are not established by any law, only clarified (at most) by them.Our rights are guaranteed by the constitution, which is the basis for our laws.
That's correct. Fighting to help a group, such as gay folks, to attain national recognition of their equal rights under the constitution isn't simply identity politics. It's a core principle for liberals of equality and justice.