Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh, didn't know that was what you met....Again, your economist link doesn't work.
The second is garbage.
Nod.
So, you can't do the math. Backed yourself into a corner.You aren't...you're doing it for you.
Your link leads to a paywalled article. I bet you haven't even read it.yeah but Xiden keeps spending.
Joe Biden is more responsible for high inflation than for abundant jobs
Joe Biden is more responsible for high inflation than for abundant jobs
The main effect of the president’s economic policies has been to boost priceswww.economist.com
Hearing Wrap Up: Biden Admin Ignored Warnings that Trillions in Spending Would Damage the Economy and Spur Inflation
Hearing Wrap Up: Biden Admin Ignored Warnings that Trillions in Spending Would Damage the Economy and Spur Inflation - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountabilityoversight.house.gov
Covid was never the reason for Xiden's spending....very little actually went to anything related to Covid and he admitted there was no federal solution to Covid
"Look, there is no federal solution," Biden said Monday,
Biden saying there is no federal solution to COVID means our patchwork response continues
Biden saying it's up to the states to end the pandemic puts a spotlight on just how different the states have reacted.www.usatoday.com
oh, didn't know that was what you met....
Joe Biden is more responsible for high inflation than for abundant jobs
Joe Biden is more responsible for high inflation than for abundant jobs
The main effect of the president’s economic policies has been to boost prices
You say it's garage but haven't been able to show anything to refute the BLS numbers....why is that?
You say it's garage but haven't been able to show anything to refute the BLS numbers....why is that?
I already offered to do that, Bluffy..So, you can't do the math. Backed yourself into a corner.
Fetch the data and do the math. It's your Rodeo.I already offered to do that, Bluffy..
So do you want to fetch the data and watch me do the math?
You're just here for the free lunch?Fetch the data and do the math. It's your Rodeo.
You're just here hoping for a free math lesson?You're just here for the free lunch?
Clearly not if my first offer was to do the math.You're just here hoping for a free math lesson?
You have been making bogus claims for several pages about some data and math you were going to cut and paste.Clearly not if my first offer was to do the math.
Instead of "clever", why don't you try
Walking the Walk
or
Admitting that you have no idea where to begin.
That's a bogus claim.You have been making bogus claims for several pages about some data and math you were going to cut and paste.
So, you never had any intention or ability to cut and paste the data and math you claimed you would provide.That's a bogus claim.
I've been quite specific.
The math involves finding a compound growth rate, or geometric average. Given that terms are multiples of 4, you are either solving for a 4th, or 8th, root.
Would you prefer to find the data?
Of course I didYour link leads to a paywalled article. I bet you haven't even read it.
But go ahead and post the salient part of the author's argument - from the text.
So you don’t have anything that actually disputes the BLS numbers?Read the OP again, liar.
I don't need to dispute the numbers....we've been experiencing disinflation for months, and the annualized rate is at 3% as of the most recent report.So you don’t have anything that actually disputes the BLS numbers?
Gotcha
Yes it’s come down since the fed raised historic levels of interest ratesI don't need to dispute the numbers....we've been experiencing disinflation for months, and the annualized rate is at 3% as of the most recent report.
Dems / Marxists like to focus on whatever number makes their party of tax and spend less awful.I don't need to dispute the numbers....we've been experiencing disinflation for months, and the annualized rate is at 3% as of the most recent report.
Inflation has been consistently falling just as we said it would. The remarkable thing is that it didn’t require a recession or high unemployment which common wisdom thought was unavoidable.Dems / Marxists like to focus on whatever number makes their party of tax and spend less awful.
The facts are that core consumer inflation is still hurting Americans.
The annual core consumer price inflation rate in the United States, which excludes volatile items such as food and energy, fell to 4.8% in June 2023, the lowest since October 2021, from 5.3% in the prior month and below market expectations of 5%. On a monthly basis, core consumer prices rose by 0.2% from a month earlier in June, also less than forecasts of a 0.3% increase. source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Read the OP.Yes it’s come down since the fed raised historic levels of interest rates
What’s your point?
Dems / Marxists like to focus on whatever number makes their party of tax and spend less awful.
The facts are that core consumer inflation is still hurting Americans.
The annual core consumer price inflation rate in the United States, which excludes volatile items such as food and energy, fell to 4.8% in June 2023, the lowest since October 2021, from 5.3% in the prior month and below market expectations of 5%. On a monthly basis, core consumer prices rose by 0.2% from a month earlier in June, also less than forecasts of a 0.3% increase. source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Dems / Marxists like to focus on whatever number makes their party of tax and spend less awful.
