- Thread starter
- #41
I still don’t get why this random guy needs to be made into some broader point. You haven’t explained why we should be doing that. Some academics say some fringe things. It happens some times. It happens on a range of subject. It doesn’t mean that the broader scientific community agrees with them.You are really doing bad at this.
Gayle Rubin (who supports the legitimization of NAMBLA,) Michel Foucault, with whom Rubin drew upon heavily for reference, (a postmodernist founder in philosophy,) who lobbied the french government to do away with the age of consent, and of course, recently, this girl/guy, trans prof. Allyn Walker, who has written that book trying to normalize "minor attracted persons," the whole point, is that queer theorists, actually believe, as I have already quoted, that minors have the ability to consent.
And you have just agreed with me, that you do not believe they do.
SO? Obviously it is wrong to make them believe they can consent to change or believe they can decide what gender they are, or consent to sexual activity before they pass puberty, or. . . as the interlocking globalists really WANT of them, to engage in being brainwashed into commercial contracts and political contracts, before puberty as well.
BUT FIRST, they have to be pried away from their parents, so they can be medically and sexually molested by the state.
Then they can be sexually and commercially raped by the state, which is the real agenda.