Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yet, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis, will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency, on an at-will basis. It is as market friendly as it gets, under any form of capitalism.it is about solving simple poverty to ensure full employment of capital resources and, a wealth of nations.All talk just to be clueless and Causeless?
I agree, when it comes to economics, you're clueless.
The Role of Unemployment as an Automatic Stabilizer During a Recession
And? Besides having zero to do with your "idea"?
"Solving poverty" isn't the same thing as using capital efficiently.
Handouts to unemployables will not improve efficiency or help GDP.
In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency
The fact that you think the natural rate is inefficiency and that any inefficiency can be reduced by government is amusing.
And no, handouts to unemployables are not market friendly.
it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will. labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis and still receive unemployment benefits. only the right wing prefers their socialism on a national basis.sure it does; for the market based metrics. only socialism eschews market based metrics, for national policies.Capital doesn't care; only the right wing, never gets it. Capital must circulate under any form of Capitalism.any lack in demand means less need for supply.
only the right wing, never gets it.
Paying people to not supply work......is inefficient use of capital.
Only the lazy never get it.
I agree, capital doesn't care about your silly "ideas".
And it certainly doesn't need to be circulated thru your hands for efficiency.
No, the government does not need to hand you money for the economy to be efficient.
Explain these "market based metrics" that demand you receive handouts.
yet, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis, will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency, on an at-will basis. It is as market friendly as it gets, under any form of capitalism.it is about solving simple poverty to ensure full employment of capital resources and, a wealth of nations.I agree, when it comes to economics, you're clueless.
The Role of Unemployment as an Automatic Stabilizer During a Recession
And? Besides having zero to do with your "idea"?
"Solving poverty" isn't the same thing as using capital efficiently.
Handouts to unemployables will not improve efficiency or help GDP.
In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency
The fact that you think the natural rate is inefficiency and that any inefficiency can be reduced by government is amusing.
And no, handouts to unemployables are not market friendly.
only the right wing, prefers their social policies on a national basis.
it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will. labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis and still receive unemployment benefits. only the right wing prefers their socialism on a national basis.sure it does; for the market based metrics. only socialism eschews market based metrics, for national policies.Capital doesn't care; only the right wing, never gets it. Capital must circulate under any form of Capitalism.Paying people to not supply work......is inefficient use of capital.
Only the lazy never get it.
I agree, capital doesn't care about your silly "ideas".
And it certainly doesn't need to be circulated thru your hands for efficiency.
No, the government does not need to hand you money for the economy to be efficient.
Explain these "market based metrics" that demand you receive handouts.
Yes, it will. It will also mean, better credit ratings.yet, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis, will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency, on an at-will basis. It is as market friendly as it gets, under any form of capitalism.it is about solving simple poverty to ensure full employment of capital resources and, a wealth of nations.
"Solving poverty" isn't the same thing as using capital efficiently.
Handouts to unemployables will not improve efficiency or help GDP.
In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency
The fact that you think the natural rate is inefficiency and that any inefficiency can be reduced by government is amusing.
And no, handouts to unemployables are not market friendly.
only the right wing, prefers their social policies on a national basis.
will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.
Wrong. Open ended unemployment compensation not tied to work will reduce employment and GDP.
why be legal to the law?it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will. labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis and still receive unemployment benefits. only the right wing prefers their socialism on a national basis.sure it does; for the market based metrics. only socialism eschews market based metrics, for national policies.Capital doesn't care; only the right wing, never gets it. Capital must circulate under any form of Capitalism.
I agree, capital doesn't care about your silly "ideas".
And it certainly doesn't need to be circulated thru your hands for efficiency.
No, the government does not need to hand you money for the economy to be efficient.
Explain these "market based metrics" that demand you receive handouts.
it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.
You have equal protection. What you don't have, and never will, is unlimited hand outs for not working.
labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis
Yes.
and still receive unemployment benefits.
Wrong. Hilariously wrong.
Yes, it will. It will also mean, better credit ratings.yet, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis, will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency, on an at-will basis. It is as market friendly as it gets, under any form of capitalism."Solving poverty" isn't the same thing as using capital efficiently.
Handouts to unemployables will not improve efficiency or help GDP.
In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency
The fact that you think the natural rate is inefficiency and that any inefficiency can be reduced by government is amusing.
And no, handouts to unemployables are not market friendly.
only the right wing, prefers their social policies on a national basis.
will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.
Wrong. Open ended unemployment compensation not tied to work will reduce employment and GDP.
why be legal to the law?it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will. labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis and still receive unemployment benefits. only the right wing prefers their socialism on a national basis.sure it does; for the market based metrics. only socialism eschews market based metrics, for national policies.I agree, capital doesn't care about your silly "ideas".
And it certainly doesn't need to be circulated thru your hands for efficiency.
No, the government does not need to hand you money for the economy to be efficient.
Explain these "market based metrics" that demand you receive handouts.
it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.
You have equal protection. What you don't have, and never will, is unlimited hand outs for not working.
labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis
Yes.
and still receive unemployment benefits.
Wrong. Hilariously wrong.
the right wing never gets it, if it is not a waste of money.Yes, it will. It will also mean, better credit ratings.yet, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis, will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency, on an at-will basis. It is as market friendly as it gets, under any form of capitalism.
In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency
The fact that you think the natural rate is inefficiency and that any inefficiency can be reduced by government is amusing.
And no, handouts to unemployables are not market friendly.
only the right wing, prefers their social policies on a national basis.
will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.
Wrong. Open ended unemployment compensation not tied to work will reduce employment and GDP.
Of course giving you free money will improve your credit rating.
But it would be bad for the country. Bad for GDP.
don't complain; be legal to federal law?why be legal to the law?it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will. labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis and still receive unemployment benefits. only the right wing prefers their socialism on a national basis.sure it does; for the market based metrics. only socialism eschews market based metrics, for national policies.
No, the government does not need to hand you money for the economy to be efficient.
Explain these "market based metrics" that demand you receive handouts.
it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.
You have equal protection. What you don't have, and never will, is unlimited hand outs for not working.
labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis
Yes.
and still receive unemployment benefits.
Wrong. Hilariously wrong.
Why be gibberish?
the right wing never gets it, if it is not a waste of money.Yes, it will. It will also mean, better credit ratings.yet, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis, will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.In this case, it is. It is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency
The fact that you think the natural rate is inefficiency and that any inefficiency can be reduced by government is amusing.
And no, handouts to unemployables are not market friendly.
only the right wing, prefers their social policies on a national basis.
will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.
Wrong. Open ended unemployment compensation not tied to work will reduce employment and GDP.
Of course giving you free money will improve your credit rating.
But it would be bad for the country. Bad for GDP.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare. We could be lowering our tax burden and improving the efficiency of our economy.
don't complain; be legal to federal law?why be legal to the law?it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will. labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis and still receive unemployment benefits. only the right wing prefers their socialism on a national basis.No, the government does not need to hand you money for the economy to be efficient.
Explain these "market based metrics" that demand you receive handouts.
it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.
You have equal protection. What you don't have, and never will, is unlimited hand outs for not working.
labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis
Yes.
and still receive unemployment benefits.
Wrong. Hilariously wrong.
Why be gibberish?
employment at will is not, time limited. only for-cause unemployment compensation should be limited by the for-cause employment criteria.the right wing never gets it, if it is not a waste of money.Yes, it will. It will also mean, better credit ratings.yet, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis, will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.
only the right wing, prefers their social policies on a national basis.
will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.
Wrong. Open ended unemployment compensation not tied to work will reduce employment and GDP.
Of course giving you free money will improve your credit rating.
But it would be bad for the country. Bad for GDP.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare. We could be lowering our tax burden and improving the efficiency of our economy.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare.
Because it's time limited, limited number of recipients and paid for by employers.
Turning it into endless welfare would boost unemployment, balloon government spending and shrink GDP.
I know, that sounds like the perfect liberal program.
Federal law = Overturning DC v Heller on federal law, supremacy grounds.don't complain; be legal to federal law?why be legal to the law?it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will. labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis and still receive unemployment benefits. only the right wing prefers their socialism on a national basis.
it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.
You have equal protection. What you don't have, and never will, is unlimited hand outs for not working.
labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis
Yes.
and still receive unemployment benefits.
Wrong. Hilariously wrong.
Why be gibberish?
Federal law = no handouts to unemployables. Why be illegal?
employment at will is not, time limited. only for-cause unemployment compensation should be limited by the for-cause employment criteria.the right wing never gets it, if it is not a waste of money.Yes, it will. It will also mean, better credit ratings.will engender a positive multiplier effect to enable us to achieve gains from capital productivity.
Wrong. Open ended unemployment compensation not tied to work will reduce employment and GDP.
Of course giving you free money will improve your credit rating.
But it would be bad for the country. Bad for GDP.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare. We could be lowering our tax burden and improving the efficiency of our economy.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare.
Because it's time limited, limited number of recipients and paid for by employers.
Turning it into endless welfare would boost unemployment, balloon government spending and shrink GDP.
I know, that sounds like the perfect liberal program.
Federal law = Overturning DC v Heller on federal law, supremacy grounds.don't complain; be legal to federal law?why be legal to the law?it is called, equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.
You have equal protection. What you don't have, and never will, is unlimited hand outs for not working.
labor has the legal right to quit on an at-will basis
Yes.
and still receive unemployment benefits.
Wrong. Hilariously wrong.
Why be gibberish?
Federal law = no handouts to unemployables. Why be illegal?
On what grounds, in an at-will employment State?employment at will is not, time limited. only for-cause unemployment compensation should be limited by the for-cause employment criteria.the right wing never gets it, if it is not a waste of money.Yes, it will. It will also mean, better credit ratings.
Of course giving you free money will improve your credit rating.
But it would be bad for the country. Bad for GDP.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare. We could be lowering our tax burden and improving the efficiency of our economy.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare.
Because it's time limited, limited number of recipients and paid for by employers.
Turning it into endless welfare would boost unemployment, balloon government spending and shrink GDP.
I know, that sounds like the perfect liberal program.
employment at will is not, time limited.
UE is.
nobody should take the national socialist right wing seriously about economics or the law.Federal law = Overturning DC v Heller on federal law, supremacy grounds.don't complain; be legal to federal law?why be legal to the law?
Why be gibberish?
Federal law = no handouts to unemployables. Why be illegal?
Federal law = get a job.
On what grounds, in an at-will employment State?employment at will is not, time limited. only for-cause unemployment compensation should be limited by the for-cause employment criteria.the right wing never gets it, if it is not a waste of money.Of course giving you free money will improve your credit rating.
But it would be bad for the country. Bad for GDP.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare. We could be lowering our tax burden and improving the efficiency of our economy.
UE compensation is simply, more cost effective than means tested welfare.
Because it's time limited, limited number of recipients and paid for by employers.
Turning it into endless welfare would boost unemployment, balloon government spending and shrink GDP.
I know, that sounds like the perfect liberal program.
employment at will is not, time limited.
UE is.
