The Right To Bear Arms

[rightwinger]

fyi; the Second Amendment allows you to have the other amendments.

For those totally ignorant of history

The right to vote secured by a free and open press allows you to have the other amendments

At no point in our history has our freedom,deliniated by the second amendment, been assured by private gun ownership. A free press protects our freedom every day

 

[Ernie S.]

That is not what was said. You are choosing to misinterpret what has been said here the same way you choose to misinterpret the 2nd amendment.

The 2nd amendment allows us the right to bear arms. How is that a misinterpretation?

What it actually says is:

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

This does not give individuals the right to bear arms. It is giving militias the right to bear arms. How is this at all relevant today??

You are 100% wrong, The 2 phrases can be taken independently. The founders realized that militias aren't a permanent entity. They may be raised, disbanded and become necessary again at a later time.
When, in the future, a citizen militia may be needed again, it will need arms. A oppressive government isn't about to arm its opposition.

 

[Si modo]

fyi; the Second Amendment allows you to have the other amendments.

For those totally ignorant of history

The right to vote secured by a free and open press allows you to have the other amendments

At no point in our history has our freedom,deliniated by the second amendment, been assured by private gun ownership. A free press protects our freedom every day

"Free and open press"

 

[Ernie S.]

Most NaziCons would wet their pants when ATF knocked on their door.

The ATF would likely never reach my door, unless they stopped by here first.
Besides, if your President ordered the ATF to go door to door to disarm the public, I doubt strongly that they would do well up against local and state police departments, National Guard units and the US Military who have all sworn to uphold the US Constitution.

Violating my right to keep and bear arms would not end well.

 

[Ernie S.]

Negging is for children, Pee-wee...

Turning rep off is for cowards that refuse to see how little respect people have for their opinions.

And, how long did it take the coward to do that after it announced that it would do that?

It was a big scary step. I believe that at the time, it was irreversible. Apparently, your rep can be turned off and on at will.

A question posed by a member in the form of a visitor message:

can you opt out of the rep system then opt back in? please clarify that rule?

And the answer from Cereal_Killer:

You sure can but be sure to get the number from us that we are wiping out. For example: your rep may be 223 on the boards but in the field that we are looking at when we wipe it out will read 1265. So I'll give you that number and have you keep it for safe keeping in case you want to opt back in. I hope that makes sense?

 

[Si modo]

That is not what was said. You are choosing to misinterpret what has been said here the same way you choose to misinterpret the 2nd amendment.

The 2nd amendment allows us the right to bear arms. How is that a misinterpretation?

What it actually says is:

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

This does not give individuals the right to bear arms. It is giving militias the right to bear arms. How is this at all relevant today??

Obviously you've never heard of District of Columbia v. Heller. The SCOTUS says the 2nd DOES give individuals the right to bear arms.

 

[Ernie S.]

fyi; the Second Amendment allows you to have the other amendments.

For those totally ignorant of history

The right to vote secured by a free and open press allows you to have the other amendments

At no point in our history has our freedom,deliniated by the second amendment, been assured by private gun ownership. A free press protects our freedom every day

A free press can inform the citizens, but is of no use to stop an oppressive government. What it CAN do, is call out the armed militia.

The Press is also free to support the oppression, kind of like MSNBC

 

[rightwinger]

fyi; the Second Amendment allows you to have the other amendments.

For those totally ignorant of history

The right to vote secured by a free and open press allows you to have the other amendments

At no point in our history has our freedom,deliniated by the second amendment, been assured by private gun ownership. A free press protects our freedom every day

A free press can inform the citizens, but is of no use to stop an oppressive government. What it CAN do, is call out the armed militia.

The Press is also free to support the oppression, kind of like MSNBC

An oppressive government is more afraid of your vote than your gun

 

[rightwinger]

fyi; the Second Amendment allows you to have the other amendments.

For those totally ignorant of history

The right to vote secured by a free and open press allows you to have the other amendments

At no point in our history has our freedom,deliniated by the second amendment, been assured by private gun ownership. A free press protects our freedom every day

"Free and open press"

With the advent of the internet, we have a more free and open press than in any time of our history

 

[peach174]

That is not what was said. You are choosing to misinterpret what has been said here the same way you choose to misinterpret the 2nd amendment.

The 2nd amendment allows us the right to bear arms. How is that a misinterpretation?

What it actually says is:

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

This does not give individuals the right to bear arms. It is giving militias the right to bear arms. How is this at all relevant today??

Then it wourld have said the right of the militia to keep and bear arms.
It says what it means and means what it says, for the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
Reading it the way it says and along with the founders letters and papers they meant for the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, not just the military.
I'm sick and tired of the lefties of this country trying to mis-read our Constitution and interpret it for their political agendas.

Adding what you want or think that the Constitution should say is totally against our freedoms as well as our Constitution.

 

[GuyPinestra]

That is not what was said. You are choosing to misinterpret what has been said here the same way you choose to misinterpret the 2nd amendment.

The 2nd amendment allows us the right to bear arms. How is that a misinterpretation?

What it actually says is:

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

This does not give individuals the right to bear arms. It is giving militias the right to bear arms. How is this at all relevant today??

Fuck, you're stupid!! We ARE the 'militia'...

 

[rightwinger]

The 2nd amendment allows us the right to bear arms. How is that a misinterpretation?

What it actually says is:

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

This does not give individuals the right to bear arms. It is giving militias the right to bear arms. How is this at all relevant today??

Fuck, you're stupid!! We ARE the 'militia'...

No you are not

You are just a bunch of morons running around with guns

 

[GuyPinestra]

What it actually says is:

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

This does not give individuals the right to bear arms. It is giving militias the right to bear arms. How is this at all relevant today??

Fuck, you're stupid!! We ARE the 'militia'...

No you are not

You are just a bunch of morons running around with guns

Definition of MILITIA
1
a : a part of the organized armed forces of a country liable to call only in emergency
b : a body of citizens organized for military service
2
: the whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service

You're as fucking stupid as she is!!

 

[rightwinger]

Fuck, you're stupid!! We ARE the 'militia'...

No you are not

You are just a bunch of morons running around with guns

Definition of MILITIA
1
a : a part of the organized armed forces of a country liable to call only in emergency
b : a body of citizens organized for military service
2
: the whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service

You're as fucking stupid as she is!!

You don't even meet the second criteria

 

[Si modo]

It's amazing to me that so many don't know about Heller.

 

[Zander]

It's amazing to me that so many don't know about Heller.

Doesn't surprise me at all. Precedent? Schmecedent!! Pack the court with new justices!!!

Dem/Prog/Lib/Socialist/Commies see the Constitution as a "living" document, subject to constant reinterpretation.....Obama thinks it is "flawed"......This is America today.

 

[Si modo]

It's amazing to me that so many don't know about Heller.

Doesn't surprise me at all. Precedent? Schmecedent!! Pack the court with new justices!!!

Dem/Prog/Lib/Socialist/Commies see the Constitution as a "living" document, subject to constant reinterpretation.....Obama thinks it is "flawed"......This is America today.

I just hope that moron Ginsberg remains alive until after January 2017.

 

[hazlnut]

fyi; the Second Amendment allows you to have the other amendments.

For those totally ignorant of history

The right to vote secured by a free and open press allows you to have the other amendments

At no point in our history has our freedom,deliniated by the second amendment, been assured by private gun ownership. A free press protects our freedom every day

A free press can inform the citizens, but is of no use to stop an oppressive government. What it CAN do, is call out the armed militia.

The Press is also free to support the oppression, kind of like MSNBC

Gun safety = oppression.

What are seat belts, gag balls?

 

[hazlnut]

It's amazing to me that so many don't know about Heller.

Doesn't surprise me at all. Precedent? Schmecedent!! Pack the court with new justices!!!

Dem/Prog/Lib/Socialist/Commies see the Constitution as a "living" document, subject to constant reinterpretation.....Obama thinks it is "flawed"......This is America today.

You idiots sound like such bitches...

 

[Contumacious]

An oppressive government is more afraid of your vote than your gun

HUH? WTF?

An oppressive government does not give a shit about anybody's vote.


Bu I agree, the 2A is obsolete, we are being governed by angels, DC has incarcerated all the criminal element , yep, the US is a paradise now.

We don't need guns anymore


.