Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
Obama is an ego manic and dangerous to us. people should be demanding he be impeached...Instead you sit in silence
SNIP:
Somehow, Obama manages to be both.
By Jonah Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Of all the time-honored failings for which we criticize sitting presidents by we I mean pundits, academics, and other members of the chattering phylum two charges stand out: imperialism and shrinkage. Usually its one or the other.
When the president is unpopular or when hes lost control of his agenda or when he just seems inadequate to the demands of the job, the headline The Incredible Shrinking Presidency proliferates like kudzu. When the Republicans lost control of Congress in 2006, The Economist proclaimed The Incredible Shrinking Presidency of George W. Bush on its cover. Barack Obama has been diagnosed with presidential shrinkage many times, including in Politico, the New York Times, and my own National Review.
The flip side of the shrinking presidency is the imperial presidency, something weve been fretting about, by name, since at least Franklin Roosevelt and in principle since the Founding.
Politically, what is remarkable is that Obama seems to be doing both at the same time. His Year of Action intended to dispel that lame-duck scent is simultaneously Caesar-like and pathetic. (Maybe the presidential seal should depict that dude from the Little Caesars pizza commercials?) Last week, he announced that he would unilaterally raise the minimum wage for federal contractors seeking new work. Only 1 percent of the workforce makes the minimum wage, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and vanishingly few of them work for the federal government. This probably explains why the White House wouldnt give an actual number when asked how many people his bold action would benefit.
Yet, at the Democratic retreat last week, Obama threw cold water on the idea that he could do much more on immigration from the Oval Office, saying there are outer limits to what we can do by executive action.
The Year of Action should actually be seen as a replay of President Clintons small-ball comeback after the 1994 midterms. Clinton picked micro-initiatives school uniforms, the V-chip, etc. that poll-tested well but amounted to very little in terms of policy. The clever twist Obama is putting on his micro-agenda is doing it in a way that successfully baits opponents into making the case that hes more powerful and relevant than he really is.
all of it here
The Shrinking Imperialist President | National Review Online
SNIP:
Somehow, Obama manages to be both.
By Jonah Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg
Of all the time-honored failings for which we criticize sitting presidents by we I mean pundits, academics, and other members of the chattering phylum two charges stand out: imperialism and shrinkage. Usually its one or the other.
When the president is unpopular or when hes lost control of his agenda or when he just seems inadequate to the demands of the job, the headline The Incredible Shrinking Presidency proliferates like kudzu. When the Republicans lost control of Congress in 2006, The Economist proclaimed The Incredible Shrinking Presidency of George W. Bush on its cover. Barack Obama has been diagnosed with presidential shrinkage many times, including in Politico, the New York Times, and my own National Review.
The flip side of the shrinking presidency is the imperial presidency, something weve been fretting about, by name, since at least Franklin Roosevelt and in principle since the Founding.
Politically, what is remarkable is that Obama seems to be doing both at the same time. His Year of Action intended to dispel that lame-duck scent is simultaneously Caesar-like and pathetic. (Maybe the presidential seal should depict that dude from the Little Caesars pizza commercials?) Last week, he announced that he would unilaterally raise the minimum wage for federal contractors seeking new work. Only 1 percent of the workforce makes the minimum wage, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and vanishingly few of them work for the federal government. This probably explains why the White House wouldnt give an actual number when asked how many people his bold action would benefit.
Yet, at the Democratic retreat last week, Obama threw cold water on the idea that he could do much more on immigration from the Oval Office, saying there are outer limits to what we can do by executive action.
Some of his unilateral actions are a bigger deal, of course. The Environmental Protection Agencys decision to treat carbon dioxide as a pollutant is an outrageous expansion of executive power. But Obama doesnt tout that as a bullet point; he let the EPA take the political heat for that decision a while ago. His multiple unilateral revisions to Obamacare run the gamut from desperate tinkering to outright lawlessness. But flop-sweat panic to compensate for executive incompetence and to fend off a rout in the midterms doesnt exactly project presidential boldness either.
The Year of Action should actually be seen as a replay of President Clintons small-ball comeback after the 1994 midterms. Clinton picked micro-initiatives school uniforms, the V-chip, etc. that poll-tested well but amounted to very little in terms of policy. The clever twist Obama is putting on his micro-agenda is doing it in a way that successfully baits opponents into making the case that hes more powerful and relevant than he really is.
all of it here
The Shrinking Imperialist President | National Review Online