Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, you could not continue forever, Rott.
Your lies do. N. C. is a Red State, for example.
Fire him, friend: he is making people reject his far right philosophy.
Fakey, you really are one stupid bitch.
James B hunt, dimocrap scumbag, was guvner of NC from 1993 to 2001.
Mike Easley, dimocrap duche, was gubner of NC from 2001 to 2009.
Beverly Perdue, dimocrap excuse for a female, was governator from 2009 to 2013.
In 2008, NC went for the lying cocksucker in chief, barack HUSSEIN obama.
Try not being such a lazy bitch, Fakey. Do a little research
But.... You're a dimocrap. 'Work' is an unknown to you
In the past, Republicans thought that the market ought to set wages, and that a combination of government devicesincluding the earned-income tax credit, housing subsidies, food stamps, Medicaid, and other social-welfare programscould fill in the gaps to make that social contract work, while also trying to remove disincentives from work via welfare reform.
The Moral and Economic Case for Raising the Minimum Wage
Three points to make here:
- How is it possible that the left is incapable of comprehending that if the minimum wage for flipping a burger goes up 20%, the cost of the burger goes up 20%, which means the cost of shipping that burger to each store goes up 20%, which means the cost of electricity goes up 20%, which means the minimum wage worker is no further ahead than they were before the minimum wage went up 20%? I'm literally astounded by the left's ignorant belief that every action occurs in a vacuum. This is basic stuff that even small children understand.
- The solution to the problem is pretty damn simple. Stop subsidizing the failure of the individual. If they can't put food on their table, there are 6 mechanisms of safety nets to ensure food gets there that do not include government. If 6 safety nets are not enough, well, then you were destined to go hungry. Just accept it and move on (and we all know that will NEVER happen with 6 safety nets, but that won't stop the liberals on USMB from making outrageous scenario's where those safety nets aren't enough).
- Once again we see the left literally make stuff up out of thin air. What "social contract"?!? I've never seen one. And I sure as hell never signed one.
In the past, Republicans thought that the market ought to set wages, and that a combination of government devicesincluding the earned-income tax credit, housing subsidies, food stamps, Medicaid, and other social-welfare programscould fill in the gaps to make that social contract work, while also trying to remove disincentives from work via welfare reform.
The Moral and Economic Case for Raising the Minimum Wage
Three points to make here:
- How is it possible that the left is incapable of comprehending that if the minimum wage for flipping a burger goes up 20%, the cost of the burger goes up 20%, which means the cost of shipping that burger to each store goes up 20%, which means the cost of electricity goes up 20%, which means the minimum wage worker is no further ahead than they were before the minimum wage went up 20%? I'm literally astounded by the left's ignorant belief that every action occurs in a vacuum. This is basic stuff that even small children understand.
- The solution to the problem is pretty damn simple. Stop subsidizing the failure of the individual. If they can't put food on their table, there are 6 mechanisms of safety nets to ensure food gets there that do not include government. If 6 safety nets are not enough, well, then you were destined to go hungry. Just accept it and move on (and we all know that will NEVER happen with 6 safety nets, but that won't stop the liberals on USMB from making outrageous scenario's where those safety nets aren't enough).
- Once again we see the left literally make stuff up out of thin air. What "social contract"?!? I've never seen one. And I sure as hell never signed one.
Yeah the Burgers in Oregon and Washington are $17 bucks for a whopper.
Wait, no they arent but Oregon and Washington has the highest min wage in the US? Hows that possible?
In the past, Republicans thought that the market ought to set wages, and that a combination of government devicesincluding the earned-income tax credit, housing subsidies, food stamps, Medicaid, and other social-welfare programscould fill in the gaps to make that social contract work, while also trying to remove disincentives from work via welfare reform.
The Moral and Economic Case for Raising the Minimum Wage
Three points to make here:
- How is it possible that the left is incapable of comprehending that if the minimum wage for flipping a burger goes up 20%, the cost of the burger goes up 20%, which means the cost of shipping that burger to each store goes up 20%, which means the cost of electricity goes up 20%, which means the minimum wage worker is no further ahead than they were before the minimum wage went up 20%? I'm literally astounded by the left's ignorant belief that every action occurs in a vacuum. This is basic stuff that even small children understand.
- The solution to the problem is pretty damn simple. Stop subsidizing the failure of the individual. If they can't put food on their table, there are 6 mechanisms of safety nets to ensure food gets there that do not include government. If 6 safety nets are not enough, well, then you were destined to go hungry. Just accept it and move on (and we all know that will NEVER happen with 6 safety nets, but that won't stop the liberals on USMB from making outrageous scenario's where those safety nets aren't enough).
- Once again we see the left literally make stuff up out of thin air. What "social contract"?!? I've never seen one. And I sure as hell never signed one.
Yeah the Burgers in Oregon and Washington are $17 bucks for a whopper.
Wait, no they arent but Oregon and Washington has the highest min wage in the US? Hows that possible?
If the minimum wage increases to $15.00, the price of a burger will not go to $17.00. However, the price will probably double or triple. That means a lot fewer people will be buying fast food. People will pay $4.00 for a big mack, but not $8.00 or $12.00. Why would anyone buy fast food for lunch if it costs more than a restaurant meal? that means fast food companies will start laying off workers in droves. That's a great way to help people with no skills, isn't it?
I wouldn't buy a big mack even if it cost .29 cents; all fast food is tasteless except for the taste of salt, and in some cases days old grease.
Of course none of this relates to the Social Contract, a theory of governing which is reflected in the Preamble to our Constitution:
"We The People ...", come on folks, you know it now think about it, how unique it is, and as a vision statement for goals our elected and appointed officials have yet to meet.
Yeah the Burgers in Oregon and Washington are $17 bucks for a whopper.
Wait, no they arent but Oregon and Washington has the highest min wage in the US? Hows that possible?
If the minimum wage increases to $15.00, the price of a burger will not go to $17.00. However, the price will probably double or triple. That means a lot fewer people will be buying fast food. People will pay $4.00 for a big mack, but not $8.00 or $12.00. Why would anyone buy fast food for lunch if it costs more than a restaurant meal? that means fast food companies will start laying off workers in droves. That's a great way to help people with no skills, isn't it?
Except the Min wage now is the highest in the US and they havent seen those dreaded increases you keep screaming about. Why not? Magic?
If the minimum wage increases to $15.00, the price of a burger will not go to $17.00. However, the price will probably double or triple. That means a lot fewer people will be buying fast food. People will pay $4.00 for a big mack, but not $8.00 or $12.00. Why would anyone buy fast food for lunch if it costs more than a restaurant meal? that means fast food companies will start laying off workers in droves. That's a great way to help people with no skills, isn't it?
Except the Min wage now is the highest in the US and they havent seen those dreaded increases you keep screaming about. Why not? Magic?
No one has ever said that increases in unemployment will be massive. However, they will be among people who can least afford it.
Furthermore, only idiots believe you can isolate the affects of one government policy from all the other government policies and factors affect some economic variable.
so you think cheating in elections is warrented because your too stupid to figure out how to leave a country you hate?
Democrats are the only ones who have ever been caught cheating, asshole.
I wouldn't buy a big mack even if it cost .29 cents; all fast food is tasteless except for the taste of salt, and in some cases days old grease.
Whether you like Big Macs isn't relevant to anything. Noe one cares what you like. The bottom line is that raising the minimum wage will cause unemployment among the people who can least afford it.
Of course none of this relates to the Social Contract, a theory of governing which is reflected in the Preamble to our Constitution:
"We The People ...", come on folks, you know it now think about it, how unique it is, and as a vision statement for goals our elected and appointed officials have yet to meet.
The preamble doesn't mention any so-called "social contract." Furthermore, the preamble is just propaganda. It has no relevance to anything tangible.
Even if the Founding Fathers believed in something called a "social contract," that wouldn't prove it actually exists.
Without proof, any claims about the "social contract" are just so much eye-wash.
If the minimum wage increases to $15.00, the price of a burger will not go to $17.00. However, the price will probably double or triple. That means a lot fewer people will be buying fast food. People will pay $4.00 for a big mack, but not $8.00 or $12.00. Why would anyone buy fast food for lunch if it costs more than a restaurant meal? that means fast food companies will start laying off workers in droves. That's a great way to help people with no skills, isn't it?
Except the Min wage now is the highest in the US and they havent seen those dreaded increases you keep screaming about. Why not? Magic?
No one has ever said that increases in unemployment will be massive. However, they will be among people who can least afford it.
Furthermore, only idiots believe you can isolate the affects of one government policy from all the other government policies and factors affect some economic variable.
so you think cheating in elections is warrented because your too stupid to figure out how to leave a country you hate?
Democrats are the only ones who have ever been caught cheating, asshole.
Tell that joke to Jeb Bush who got caught trying to create a felons list which didn't include Hispanic felons. I'm sure he'll get a good laugh too.
Except the Min wage now is the highest in the US and they havent seen those dreaded increases you keep screaming about. Why not? Magic?
No one has ever said that increases in unemployment will be massive. However, they will be among people who can least afford it.
Furthermore, only idiots believe you can isolate the affects of one government policy from all the other government policies and factors affect some economic variable.
As if you give a shit about those people. But fear not, they'll be just fine. Brain-dead Conservative predictions of doom and gloom if the minimum wage gets raised have never come through to fruition.
I wouldn't buy a big mack even if it cost .29 cents; all fast food is tasteless except for the taste of salt, and in some cases days old grease.
Whether you like Big Macs isn't relevant to anything. Noe one cares what you like. The bottom line is that raising the minimum wage will cause unemployment among the people who can least afford it.
Of course none of this relates to the Social Contract, a theory of governing which is reflected in the Preamble to our Constitution:
"We The People ...", come on folks, you know it now think about it, how unique it is, and as a vision statement for goals our elected and appointed officials have yet to meet.
The preamble doesn't mention any so-called "social contract." Furthermore, the preamble is just propaganda. It has no relevance to anything tangible.
Even if the Founding Fathers believed in something called a "social contract," that wouldn't prove it actually exists.
Without proof, any claims about the "social contract" are just so much eye-wash.
Again, the "social contract" they envisioned was not what people call it today.
Jay said we bind together to preserve rights. That is it.
He didn't say we are responsible to feed each other.
Whether you like Big Macs isn't relevant to anything. Noe one cares what you like. The bottom line is that raising the minimum wage will cause unemployment among the people who can least afford it.
The preamble doesn't mention any so-called "social contract." Furthermore, the preamble is just propaganda. It has no relevance to anything tangible.
Even if the Founding Fathers believed in something called a "social contract," that wouldn't prove it actually exists.
Without proof, any claims about the "social contract" are just so much eye-wash.
Again, the "social contract" they envisioned was not what people call it today.
Jay said we bind together to preserve rights. That is it.
He didn't say we are responsible to feed each other.
Whatever it is, calling it a "contract" is deception since that implies we all agreed to it.
Whether you like Big Macs isn't relevant to anything. Noe one cares what you like. The bottom line is that raising the minimum wage will cause unemployment among the people who can least afford it.
The preamble doesn't mention any so-called "social contract." Furthermore, the preamble is just propaganda. It has no relevance to anything tangible.
Even if the Founding Fathers believed in something called a "social contract," that wouldn't prove it actually exists.
Without proof, any claims about the "social contract" are just so much eye-wash.
Again, the "social contract" they envisioned was not what people call it today.
Jay said we bind together to preserve rights. That is it.
He didn't say we are responsible to feed each other.
Whatever it is, calling it a "contract" is deception since that implies we all agreed to it.
Again, the "social contract" they envisioned was not what people call it today.
Jay said we bind together to preserve rights. That is it.
He didn't say we are responsible to feed each other.
Whatever it is, calling it a "contract" is deception since that implies we all agreed to it.
Then call it whatever you want and stop crying about it.
Geez...Repubs cry about reality all day. Social Contract wahh! Political Correctness Waaa!
Get off you ass and Change it then. But when you find out you cant control reality you'll go back to crying
I wouldn't buy a big mack even if it cost .29 cents; all fast food is tasteless except for the taste of salt, and in some cases days old grease.
Whether you like Big Macs isn't relevant to anything. Noe one cares what you like. The bottom line is that raising the minimum wage will cause unemployment among the people who can least afford it.
Of course none of this relates to the Social Contract, a theory of governing which is reflected in the Preamble to our Constitution:
"We The People ...", come on folks, you know it now think about it, how unique it is, and as a vision statement for goals our elected and appointed officials have yet to meet.
The preamble doesn't mention any so-called "social contract." Furthermore, the preamble is just propaganda. It has no relevance to anything tangible.
Even if the Founding Fathers believed in something called a "social contract," that wouldn't prove it actually exists.
Without proof, any claims about the "social contract" are just so much eye-wash.
Again, the "social contract" they envisioned was not what people call it today.
REALLY? So we can infer the "Arms" mentioned in the Second Amendment and the "Arms" available to citizens today are not what James Madison and George Mason envisioned.
Jay said we bind together to preserve rights. That is it.
He didn't say we are responsible to feed each other.
