Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To reiterate, the tyranny of the majority cannot be used to deny individuals their Constitutional rights. The SCOTUS has no option but to uphold this principle or it has to declare the 14th Amendment to equal rights under the law unconstitutional. That is never going to happen so gay marriage is here to stay.
To reiterate, the tyranny of the majority cannot be used to deny individuals their Constitutional rights. The SCOTUS has no option but to uphold this principle or it has to declare the 14th Amendment to equal rights under the law unconstitutional. That is never going to happen so gay marriage is here to stay.
Show me where the US Constitution specifies that a limited set of deviant sexual behaviors suddenly qualify for protection under "race" "religion", "gender" or "country of origin".
Do you think that while the Justices are thinking "LGBT" they are not also thinking "P" too? [polygamy] etc?
The 14th Amendment if memory serves.To reiterate, the tyranny of the majority cannot be used to deny individuals their Constitutional rights. The SCOTUS has no option but to uphold this principle or it has to declare the 14th Amendment to equal rights under the law unconstitutional. That is never going to happen so gay marriage is here to stay.
Show me where the US Constitution specifies that a limited set of deviant sexual behaviors suddenly qualify for protection under "race" "religion", "gender" or "country of origin".
Do you think that while the Justices are thinking "LGBT" they are not also thinking "P" too? [polygamy] etc?
Show me where the constitution says anything about those things you mentioned except religion
The 14th Amendment if memory serves.Show me where the US Constitution specifies that a limited set of deviant sexual behaviors suddenly qualify for protection under "race" "religion", "gender" or "country of origin".
Do you think that while the Justices are thinking "LGBT" they are not also thinking "P" too? [polygamy] etc?
Show me where the constitution says anything about those things you mentioned except religion
To reiterate, the tyranny of the majority cannot be used to deny individuals their Constitutional rights. The SCOTUS has no option but to uphold this principle or it has to declare the 14th Amendment to equal rights under the law unconstitutional. That is never going to happen so gay marriage is here to stay.
Show me where the US Constitution specifies that a limited set of deviant sexual behaviors suddenly qualify for protection under "race" "religion", "gender" or "country of origin".
Do you think that while the Justices are thinking "LGBT" they are not also thinking "P" too? [polygamy] etc?
It suffices for us to acknowledge that adults may choose to enter upon this relationship in the confines of their homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free persons. When sexuality finds overt expression in intimate conduct with another person, the conduct can be but one element in a personal bond that is more enduring. The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice.
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
The 14th Amendment if memory serves.Show me where the US Constitution specifies that a limited set of deviant sexual behaviors suddenly qualify for protection under "race" "religion", "gender" or "country of origin".
Do you think that while the Justices are thinking "LGBT" they are not also thinking "P" too? [polygamy] etc?
Show me where the constitution says anything about those things you mentioned except religion
In explaining the respect the Constitution demands for the autonomy of the person in making these choices, we stated as follows:
These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define ones own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life. Beliefs about these matters could not define the attributes of personhood were they formed under compulsion of the State. Ibid.
Persons in a homosexual relationship may seek autonomy for these purposes, just as heterosexual persons do.
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
Sil, this dog won't hunt, the war is over, and you lost. How long before you start dealing with the reality that gay people now get to get married like straight people? That never should have been up for a vote in the first place but it wouldn't matter now if it was, you'd still lose since the times have changed, and yet, you haven't...
position....., on your knees or......??
Sil, this dog won't hunt, the war is over, and you lost. How long before you start dealing with the reality that gay people now get to get married like straight people? That never should have been up for a vote in the first place but it wouldn't matter now if it was, you'd still lose since the times have changed, and yet, you haven't...
we fully understand your position....., on your knees or......??
I think it's time to move on with this issue....it's over, gays won. Just be happy for them or pretend to be for votes maybe.
This dog not only hunted "Paint" but it bit the Gay Agenda right in the butt July 18, 2014. The fight isn't over. In fact for your side the pendulum swing-back has only just begun.
Brace yourself for a series of legal setbacks. If that's what you call restoring the control of human behaviors and who may marry back to state level "a defeat". I consider it a victory for democracy.
A limited grouping of deviant sex behaviors-as-cult using the 14th Amendment to dictate to an unwilling majority is the dog that ain't gonna hunt friend...
This dog not only hunted "Paint" but it bit the Gay Agenda right in the butt July 18, 2014. The fight isn't over. In fact for your side the pendulum swing-back has only just begun.
Brace yourself for a series of legal setbacks. If that's what you call restoring the control of human behaviors and who may marry back to state level "a defeat". I consider it a victory for democracy.
A limited grouping of deviant sex behaviors-as-cult using the 14th Amendment to dictate to an unwilling majority is the dog that ain't gonna hunt friend...
prescisely defined constitutional rights that protect minorities against unconstitutional discriminatioin by the majority (voters or not}. SCOTUS has re-affirmed this many times. And with Kennedy (maybe the most ardent defender of gay rights on the Court) solidly aligned with the four "liberal" leaning justices PMH is right, the ship has sailed on the groups who want to codify discrimination.
This dog not only hunted "Paint" but it bit the Gay Agenda right in the butt July 18, 2014. The fight isn't over. In fact for your side the pendulum swing-back has only just begun.
Brace yourself for a series of legal setbacks. If that's what you call restoring the control of human behaviors and who may marry back to state level "a defeat". I consider it a victory for democracy.
A limited grouping of deviant sex behaviors-as-cult using the 14th Amendment to dictate to an unwilling majority is the dog that ain't gonna hunt friend...
prescisely defined constitutional rights that protect minorities against unconstitutional discriminatioin by the majority (voters or not}. SCOTUS has re-affirmed this many times. And with Kennedy (maybe the most ardent defender of gay rights on the Court) solidly aligned with the four "liberal" leaning justices PMH is right, the ship has sailed on the groups who want to codify discrimination.
Homosexuals are not a minority.
Everyone has the ability to claim to be a homosexual. Not everyone can lay claim to being an African-American, a Native American, of Latino origin, or a woman(though I don't consider them a minority).
If you do something stupid on the job. Don't apologize for it, just tell the boss you are gay. They can't fire you that way, it would be discrimination.
I don't have the slightness confidence that the ban will be upheld by the SCOTUS. I don't think they care if the will of the people are suppressed nor voters are disenfranchised.
prescisely defined constitutional rights that protect minorities against unconstitutional discriminatioin by the majority (voters or not}. SCOTUS has re-affirmed this many times. And with Kennedy (maybe the most ardent defender of gay rights on the Court) solidly aligned with the four "liberal" leaning justices PMH is right, the ship has sailed on the groups who want to codify discrimination.
Homosexuals are not a minority.
Everyone has the ability to claim to be a homosexual. Not everyone can lay claim to being an African-American, a Native American, of Latino origin, or a woman(though I don't consider them a minority).
If you do something stupid on the job. Don't apologize for it, just tell the boss you are gay. They can't fire you that way, it would be discrimination.
prescisely defined constitutional rights that protect minorities against unconstitutional discriminatioin by the majority (voters or not}. SCOTUS has re-affirmed this many times. And with Kennedy (maybe the most ardent defender of gay rights on the Court) solidly aligned with the four "liberal" leaning justices PMH is right, the ship has sailed on the groups who want to codify discrimination.
prescisely defined constitutional rights that protect minorities against unconstitutional discriminatioin by the majority (voters or not}. SCOTUS has re-affirmed this many times. And with Kennedy (maybe the most ardent defender of gay rights on the Court) solidly aligned with the four "liberal" leaning justices PMH is right, the ship has sailed on the groups who want to codify discrimination.
Behaviors aren't "minorities". So your premise fails before your argument even gets off the ground...
prescisely defined constitutional rights that protect minorities against unconstitutional discriminatioin by the majority (voters or not}. SCOTUS has re-affirmed this many times. And with Kennedy (maybe the most ardent defender of gay rights on the Court) solidly aligned with the four "liberal" leaning justices PMH is right, the ship has sailed on the groups who want to codify discrimination.
Behaviors aren't "minorities". So your premise fails before your argument even gets off the ground...
Onus is on YOU to PROVE that homosexuality is a "behavior".
Until you can your position is a non starter.
