The supreme court today announced...

[otto105]

That they were unable to identify the person who leaked the dobbs decision because uncle clareance thomas says that he doesn't speak to his wife about those issues.

 

[Rambunctious]

It was a leftist justice... isn't that obvious?....

 

[otto105]

It was a leftist justice... isn't that obvious?....

Why?

The failure to find the leaker tells me it wasn't really looked for by the conservative majority.

 

[bodecea]

That they were unable to identify the person who leaked the dobbs decision because uncle clareance thomas says that he doesn't speak to his wife about those issues.

They didn't want to know.....but it was Aleito. (unless Kavanaugh was offered a case of his favorite beer)

 

[TNHarley]

ok cool

 

[Rambunctious]

Why?

The failure to find the leaker tells me it wasn't really looked for by the conservative majority.

One of the liberal justices or their staff leaked it to harm republicans chances in the midterms...

 

[otto105]

One of the liberal justices or their staff leaked it to harm republicans chances in the midterms...

it was leaked by a conservative justice to lock the decision in with the thought it would help conservatives in the mid-terms.

 

[Rambunctious]

it was leaked by a conservative justice to lock the decision in with the thought it would help conservatives in the mid-terms.

That doesn't make any sense...

 

[bodecea]

One of the liberal justices or their staff leaked it to harm republicans chances in the midterms...

The final decision came out BEFORE the midterms. Try again.

 

[Rambunctious]

it was leaked by a conservative justice to lock the decision in with the thought it would help conservatives in the mid-terms.

Its dems that always over step the constitution and the law to defeat republicans...

 

[otto105]

That doesn't make any sense...

Sure, it does since the decision was released in the summer before the mid-terms.

 

[Rambunctious]

The final decision came out BEFORE the midterms. Try again.

Yes but by leaking it without the facts of the
decision they could spin it any way they wanted....
dems don't change the way they operate so predicting their moves is getting very easy to do....

 

[Rambunctious]

Sure, it does since the decision was released in the summer before the mid-terms.

Yes but by leaking it without the facts of the
decision they could spin it any way they wanted....
dems don't change the way they operate so predicting their moves is getting very easy to do....

 

[otto105]

Yes but by leaking it without the facts of the
decision they could spin it any way they wanted....
dems don't change the way they operate so predicting their moves is getting very easy to do....

Waterboi.

I bet ginny thomas did it after some pillow talk with her uncle clarence.

 

[Rambunctious]

The final decision came out BEFORE the midterms. Try again.

Hell I wish the GOP would start acting like dems but they won't....

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

uncle… thomas

Fuck you, racist piece of shit.

 

[Rambunctious]

Waterboi.

I bet ginny thomas did it after some pillow talk with her uncle clarence.

You are very weird.....

 

[otto105]

Hell I wish the GOP would start acting like dems but they won't....

I wish they would act sane too.

 

[MisterBeale]

The final decision came out BEFORE the midterms. Try again.

The final decision was not as important as the leak.
The leak gave time for the press, and the DNC party, to spin this as a political issue, for both fundraising and media campaigns.

The leak was far more advantageous to the establishment left and the establishment right, than it was for Trump aligned MAGA type politicians.


It was necessary to get that leak out BEFORE the GOP primaries. The DNC even admitted that they gave money to GOP primary contests.


It is pretty clear, and, I had long ago commented MANY TIMES, that they would never tell the public who leaked the decision, because the leak was intentional, by both establishment leaning liberals and conservatives.

The only person we can be sure that has his hands clean, is probably Thomas.


This was meant to get as many MAGA GOP candidates to win in the primaries, so that the DNC would have easy victories in the mid-terms.



Wise up.

 

[otto105]

The final decision was not as important as the leak. T
The leak gave time for the press, and the DNC party, to spin this as a political issue, for both fundraising and media campaigns.

The leak was far more advantageous to the establishment left and the establishment right, than it was for Trump aligned MAGA type politicians.


It was necessary to get that leak out BEFORE the GOP primaries. The DNC even admitted that they gave money to GOP primary contests.


It is pretty clear, and, I had long ago commented MANY TIMES, that they would never tell the public who leaked the decision, because the leak was intentional, by both establishment leaning liberals and conservatives.

The only person we can be sure that has his hands clean, is probably Thomas.


This was meant to get as many MAGA GOP candidates to win in the primaries, so that the DNC would have easy victories in the mid-terms.



Wise up.

The leaker wanted to prove that the former 1-term fuckups justices would deliver the goods.

Hence the leak. The leaker clearly underestimated the response of the people who support a right of privacy.