The Temple Mount Myth Revealed

[Weatherman2020]

Rip it down and get it over with, enough of the Itinerant Arab Muslims in Israel having a focal point from which to incite more violence. The site has NO historical value in the Muslim faith. It was nothign more than a brand put on Israel and it needs to be erased

It will come down, that is assured. The only question is how it will be done and peace remain as foretold.

 

[Hossfly]

You have no idea how foolish yours is. Who do you think the original Palestinians were, Canaanites , Phoenicians and whoever else lived there. Its was never Israel. Never was an Israel. Israel was only in the OT. What you base your faith in is null and void. Most of it , the OT , is just lies and stories, made up. They have their Talmud, and that was wrote in Babylon. Whoever was living there when Rome took over were not Israelites or Jews. There most likely was not even a Sol (sun) omon.

Civilizations have risen and fallen all over this planet, but we can see you were not a good student in school if you can't even write simple English correctly. It's a shame that Jesus wasn't still around to tell the good Roman Catholic Penelope that he was a Jew and not to call his Bible a fairy tale. I wonder if Penelope knows what Jesus was celebrating at the Last Supper.

The way that Penelope carries on against the Jews, I can imagine how happy she would have been leading a pogrom.

Hoss,if Jesus returned today,do you really think he would tolerate the behaviour of the Zionists,No he would not,they are so far removed from the teachings of Christ.......they would be an anathema to him.......get real..your friend steve

The teachings of Christ happen to be the adulterated version of Judaism the Romans and Greeks took away from the holy land with them. Just as islam is the adulterated version of Judaism and Christianity that mo'mad invented.

If Jesus came back today he would pick up a gun and stand shoulder to shoulder with the IDF as he was a ZIONIST in the true sence of the word

omg You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST.....Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God........Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS.....Pheo.....you and the rest of Your Horde,are not only MAD but would be a total anathema to Jesus...........he would NOT stand shoulder to shoulder with Zionists or the IDF......BUT WOULD SMITE YOU ALL DOWN.

As I said you all speak madness because you are completely MAD......H.I.M.S.I.A.M.

Repeat of post 178
OMG,You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit Pheo.,if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST....(Invented in 1890's)..Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God....Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS....Pheo...you and the rest of your Terrorist Horde,are not only Mad but would be a total ANATHEMA to Jesus....he would not stand shoulder to shoulder(how ridiculous) with ZIONIST TRASH or the IDF.....BUT WOULD SMITE YOU DOWN
As I said you all speak Madness because YOU ARE COMPLETELY MAD.....H.I.M.S.I.A.M......

As I said YOU ARE MAD

Jesus was a Jewish Rabbi. That means he was a Zionist. He never was a practicing Christian.

 

[Phoenall]

WRONG

It is forbidden for the Jews to enter the holy of holies which is under the carbuncle built in the 19C and rebuilt in the 20C. No contrversy as artifacts pertaining to the Temple have been found in the spoil heaps of muslim archeological digs.

And just who gave the swden commission the authority to do that, would it by any chance be the muslims ?

Concerning religious view:
"A few hours after the Temple Mount came under Israeli control during the Six-Day War, a message from the Chief Rabbis of Israel, Isser Yehuda Unterman and Yitzhak Nissim was broadcast, warning that Jews were not permitted to enter the site.[120] This warning was reiterated by the Council of the Chief Rabbinate a few days later, which issued an explanation written by Rabbi Bezalel Jolti (Zolti) that "Since the sanctity of the site has never ended, it is forbidden to enter the Temple Mount until the Temple is built."[120] The signatures of more than 300 prominent rabbis were later obtained."- Wikipedia

During the British Mandate over Palestine, the Buraq Revolution took place on 23 August, 1929; an international commission was formed to examine the claims of Muslims and Jews to the Western Wall. The commission was headed by the former Swedish Foreign Minister, Eliel Lofgren; the former Vice President of the International Court of Justice, Charles Bard from Switzerland, served as a member. After the investigation conducted by this committee and after hearing all points of view, the committee issued a report in 1930 and submitted it to the League of Nations; it confirmed the undoubted right of the Muslims to ownership of the Buraq Wall.

If the Rabbinate said that Jews couldn't enter the Holy of Holies, how come heathen Muslims can desecrate the site with their filthy shoes on?

Muslims and Christians are not concerned by jewish myths mostly there is no unanimity about its place.

Yet they have stole them and used them as their own for the last 2000 years/1400years. That is how much they are concerned about them.

When I first saw this thread I thought that it was to explore the myth of mo'mad riding a donkey at night and landing in al aqsa outside of Medina.

When muslims enter Jerusalem jews were minority, it was small mount village and the place of Alqsa mosque was an empty area. They built the mosque.

They stole the Christian chhurch that was there and built the mosque around it, why cant you ever tell the truth about your fellow muslims.

 

[Phoenall]

no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon,

Show me historical evidence of anyone from 3,500 years ago. Find me evidence Mohammed existed.
Oh yeah, written historical evidence just as it is with David and Solomon.

Not an archeologist around who denies the existence of David and Solomon.

Find me evidence King David or Solomon did. In any case it doesn't matter. The temple mount belongs to the Palestinians, the Zionists had better things to do stealing everyone's money. Destroyed Russia, Germany, and now the US.

Nope it belongs to the Jews under internatinal law, and the arab muslims need to get of the land

 

[Phoenall]

You really have no idea how foolish your "argument" is, do you? There were no Palestinians "back in the day" either. They were Israelites. And Judeans. Some of them stayed in the land. Some of them were exiled. Some are still in the land. And some have returned from exile. The land was then and now: Israel.

You have no idea how foolish yours is. Who do you think the original Palestinians were, Canaanites , Phoenicians and whoever else lived there. Its was never Israel. Never was an Israel. Israel was only in the OT. What you base your faith in is null and void. Most of it , the OT , is just lies and stories, made up. They have their Talmud, and that was wrote in Babylon. Whoever was living there when Rome took over were not Israelites or Jews. There most likely was not even a Sol (sun) omon.

Civilizations have risen and fallen all over this planet, but we can see you were not a good student in school if you can't even write simple English correctly. It's a shame that Jesus wasn't still around to tell the good Roman Catholic Penelope that he was a Jew and not to call his Bible a fairy tale. I wonder if Penelope knows what Jesus was celebrating at the Last Supper.

The way that Penelope carries on against the Jews, I can imagine how happy she would have been leading a pogrom.

Hoss,if Jesus returned today,do you really think he would tolerate the behaviour of the Zionists,No he would not,they are so far removed from the teachings of Christ.......they would be an anathema to him.......get real..your friend steve

The teachings of Christ happen to be the adulterated version of Judaism the Romans and Greeks took away from the holy land with them. Just as islam is the adulterated version of Judaism and Christianity that mo'mad invented.

If Jesus came back today he would pick up a gun and stand shoulder to shoulder with the IDF as he was a ZIONIST in the true sence of the word

omg You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST.....Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God........Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS.....Pheo.....you and the rest of Your Horde,are not only MAD but would be a total anathema to Jesus...........he would NOT stand shoulder to shoulder with Zionists or the IDF......BUT WOULD SMITE YOU ALL DOWN.

As I said you all speak madness because you are completely MAD......H.I.M.S.I.A.M.

Shows just how much you know about the man who led the revolt against the Romans. Try reading the account of his death again and see what happened, do the math on how long he was on the cross for and how long it takes to die that way

 

[Phoenall]

The land already had a bride, the Palestinians, which are Christian, Jewish and Muslim, the ones who stayed, during and after the exile, after Greek and Roman empires, and throughout the Ottoman empire, those who worked the land.

Yes. And the Jewish Palestinians are the oldest surviving peoples who originated on that land. Some of them were able to stay and some of them were exiled. Now those same Jewish Palestinians would like to have self-determination on their historical land. Separate from the Arab Palestinians. Which is convenient because the Arab Palestinians also want self-determination, separate from the Jewish Palestinians.

The problem comes when people can't keep their own arguments straight enough to remember the basic historical truths that you just wrote in that paragraph and start trying to find all sorts of silly excuses for denying those basic facts.

There is no such thing as a palestinian. We have Arab Muslim colonists and we have the Judaic people. There is an extremely low level of data to suggest that the Judaic people converted when the Arab Muslim armies swept through. It was the very recent second invasion in which nearly all of the present itinerant Arab Muslim colonists arrived; they basically followed the jobs created by the Zionist movement and subsequent improvements to the area.

With other peoples Money

No with Israel's money and that is what gets right up your muslim nose. That the Jews will provide for their own while your own people wont give but the minimum. There are only 12 million Jews in the world,and still they can earn more than the 2 billion muslims can showing who works the hardest. Why are you muslims at the bottom of every table that deals with earnings, education and prospects ?

Joke,Israel's money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Try American Tax-Payers Money

When did they start getting American taxpayers money then, do you even know. Shows just how little you islamonazi's really know about the reality of this world, next you will be saying that Ayres rock is a muslim holy site because the local imam said so

 

[theliq]

Civilizations have risen and fallen all over this planet, but we can see you were not a good student in school if you can't even write simple English correctly. It's a shame that Jesus wasn't still around to tell the good Roman Catholic Penelope that he was a Jew and not to call his Bible a fairy tale. I wonder if Penelope knows what Jesus was celebrating at the Last Supper.

The way that Penelope carries on against the Jews, I can imagine how happy she would have been leading a pogrom.

Hoss,if Jesus returned today,do you really think he would tolerate the behaviour of the Zionists,No he would not,they are so far removed from the teachings of Christ.......they would be an anathema to him.......get real..your friend steve

The teachings of Christ happen to be the adulterated version of Judaism the Romans and Greeks took away from the holy land with them. Just as islam is the adulterated version of Judaism and Christianity that mo'mad invented.

If Jesus came back today he would pick up a gun and stand shoulder to shoulder with the IDF as he was a ZIONIST in the true sence of the word

omg You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST.....Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God........Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS.....Pheo.....you and the rest of Your Horde,are not only MAD but would be a total anathema to Jesus...........he would NOT stand shoulder to shoulder with Zionists or the IDF......BUT WOULD SMITE YOU ALL DOWN.

As I said you all speak madness because you are completely MAD......H.I.M.S.I.A.M.

Repeat of post 178
OMG,You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit Pheo.,if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST....(Invented in 1890's)..Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God....Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS....Pheo...you and the rest of your Terrorist Horde,are not only Mad but would be a total ANATHEMA to Jesus....he would not stand shoulder to shoulder(how ridiculous) with ZIONIST TRASH or the IDF.....BUT WOULD SMITE YOU DOWN
As I said you all speak Madness because YOU ARE COMPLETELY MAD.....H.I.M.S.I.A.M......

As I said YOU ARE MAD

Jesus was a Jewish Rabbi. That means he was a Zionist. He never was a practicing Christian.

Bloody Hell Hoss.........1st Time I have ever seen you speak so much SHIT in print..............Rabbi Jesus LOL,he was a ZIONIST,......lay off the Grog and Happy Purple Pills Man,.....it will Fuck your Brain...steve

 

[theliq]

You have no idea how foolish yours is. Who do you think the original Palestinians were, Canaanites , Phoenicians and whoever else lived there. Its was never Israel. Never was an Israel. Israel was only in the OT. What you base your faith in is null and void. Most of it , the OT , is just lies and stories, made up. They have their Talmud, and that was wrote in Babylon. Whoever was living there when Rome took over were not Israelites or Jews. There most likely was not even a Sol (sun) omon.

Civilizations have risen and fallen all over this planet, but we can see you were not a good student in school if you can't even write simple English correctly. It's a shame that Jesus wasn't still around to tell the good Roman Catholic Penelope that he was a Jew and not to call his Bible a fairy tale. I wonder if Penelope knows what Jesus was celebrating at the Last Supper.

The way that Penelope carries on against the Jews, I can imagine how happy she would have been leading a pogrom.

Hoss,if Jesus returned today,do you really think he would tolerate the behaviour of the Zionists,No he would not,they are so far removed from the teachings of Christ.......they would be an anathema to him.......get real..your friend steve

The teachings of Christ happen to be the adulterated version of Judaism the Romans and Greeks took away from the holy land with them. Just as islam is the adulterated version of Judaism and Christianity that mo'mad invented.

If Jesus came back today he would pick up a gun and stand shoulder to shoulder with the IDF as he was a ZIONIST in the true sence of the word

omg You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST.....Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God........Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS.....Pheo.....you and the rest of Your Horde,are not only MAD but would be a total anathema to Jesus...........he would NOT stand shoulder to shoulder with Zionists or the IDF......BUT WOULD SMITE YOU ALL DOWN.

As I said you all speak madness because you are completely MAD......H.I.M.S.I.A.M.

Shows just how much you know about the man who led the revolt against the Romans. Try reading the account of his death again and see what happened, do the math on how long he was on the cross for and how long it takes to die that way

Try Again you are heading towards blaming the Jews or in your fcuked up timeline..Zionists for murdering Jesus,you and Hoss are walking on Quick Sand here...watch you mouths

 

[Phoenall]

Hoss,if Jesus returned today,do you really think he would tolerate the behaviour of the Zionists,No he would not,they are so far removed from the teachings of Christ.......they would be an anathema to him.......get real..your friend steve

The teachings of Christ happen to be the adulterated version of Judaism the Romans and Greeks took away from the holy land with them. Just as islam is the adulterated version of Judaism and Christianity that mo'mad invented.

If Jesus came back today he would pick up a gun and stand shoulder to shoulder with the IDF as he was a ZIONIST in the true sence of the word

omg You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST.....Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God........Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS.....Pheo.....you and the rest of Your Horde,are not only MAD but would be a total anathema to Jesus...........he would NOT stand shoulder to shoulder with Zionists or the IDF......BUT WOULD SMITE YOU ALL DOWN.

As I said you all speak madness because you are completely MAD......H.I.M.S.I.A.M.

Repeat of post 178
OMG,You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit Pheo.,if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST....(Invented in 1890's)..Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God....Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS....Pheo...you and the rest of your Terrorist Horde,are not only Mad but would be a total ANATHEMA to Jesus....he would not stand shoulder to shoulder(how ridiculous) with ZIONIST TRASH or the IDF.....BUT WOULD SMITE YOU DOWN
As I said you all speak Madness because YOU ARE COMPLETELY MAD.....H.I.M.S.I.A.M......

As I said YOU ARE MAD

Jesus was a Jewish Rabbi. That means he was a Zionist. He never was a practicing Christian.

Bloody Hell Hoss.........1st Time I have ever seen you speak so much SHIT in print..............Rabbi Jesus LOL,he was a ZIONIST,......lay off the Grog and Happy Purple Pills Man,.....it will Fuck your Brain...steve

Is that your problem too many purple pills. Read the Bible and you will see that Jesus preached the same thing as the Zionists of today, that Israel is the Jewish national home and the muslims have no authority in the land

 

[Phoenall]

Civilizations have risen and fallen all over this planet, but we can see you were not a good student in school if you can't even write simple English correctly. It's a shame that Jesus wasn't still around to tell the good Roman Catholic Penelope that he was a Jew and not to call his Bible a fairy tale. I wonder if Penelope knows what Jesus was celebrating at the Last Supper.

The way that Penelope carries on against the Jews, I can imagine how happy she would have been leading a pogrom.

Hoss,if Jesus returned today,do you really think he would tolerate the behaviour of the Zionists,No he would not,they are so far removed from the teachings of Christ.......they would be an anathema to him.......get real..your friend steve

The teachings of Christ happen to be the adulterated version of Judaism the Romans and Greeks took away from the holy land with them. Just as islam is the adulterated version of Judaism and Christianity that mo'mad invented.

If Jesus came back today he would pick up a gun and stand shoulder to shoulder with the IDF as he was a ZIONIST in the true sence of the word

omg You really are in a state of flooded Bullshit if you believe that Jesus is or would ever be a ZIONIST.....Jesus was not a two-bit TERRORIST but the son of God........Some of you posters ARE COMPLETELY BONKERS.....Pheo.....you and the rest of Your Horde,are not only MAD but would be a total anathema to Jesus...........he would NOT stand shoulder to shoulder with Zionists or the IDF......BUT WOULD SMITE YOU ALL DOWN.

As I said you all speak madness because you are completely MAD......H.I.M.S.I.A.M.

Shows just how much you know about the man who led the revolt against the Romans. Try reading the account of his death again and see what happened, do the math on how long he was on the cross for and how long it takes to die that way

Try Again you are heading towards blaming the Jews or in your fcuked up timeline..Zionists for murdering Jesus,you and Hoss are walking on Quick Sand here...watch you mouths

As I said read the accounts of his alleged death and see who they dont make any sense. It is the catholic nazi's that blame the Jews for his murder, and you muslims jumped on that bandwagon 700 years latert. He was killed by the Romans at Masada when they put down the last of the resistance forces. Ever since then the catholics and muslims have blamed the Jews for his murder, the first blood libel.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Let me expand on that someone cheeky post above by saying first, that I in no way support the destruction of Al-Aqsa nor the Dome of the Rock. I am against, in principle, the idea that destroying other people's holy places is....well....kosher. Let me also be clear that I am also very much against usurping other people's holy places. And the Temple Mount IS a Jewish holy place and was a Jewish holy place thousands of years before a succession of invaders came.

But Freeman's post makes "morally right" a number of clear wrongs.

*that reducing a holy place to rubble makes the place "available" for anyone walking by to take
*that if people are prevented from utilizing a holy place, it makes that place "available" for anyone walking by
*that lack of knowledge about the holiness of a place, renders that place not holy
*that once you are made aware of your trespass, you bear no responsibility for correcting it

You're probably referring to my cheeky post about demolition of the abominations on the Temple Mount. No way do they belong there. Al Aqsa was built in 705 CE. Mohammed made his Night Journey in 621 CE and died in 632 CE. He either didn't make the trip or else he was a time traveler. I don't believe one bit of that fairy tale.

Al Aqsa is so important to Muslims they don't even mention it in their Koran.

Or even face it while praying on the Temple Mount itself.

 

[Phoenall]

Let me expand on that someone cheeky post above by saying first, that I in no way support the destruction of Al-Aqsa nor the Dome of the Rock. I am against, in principle, the idea that destroying other people's holy places is....well....kosher. Let me also be clear that I am also very much against usurping other people's holy places. And the Temple Mount IS a Jewish holy place and was a Jewish holy place thousands of years before a succession of invaders came.

But Freeman's post makes "morally right" a number of clear wrongs.

*that reducing a holy place to rubble makes the place "available" for anyone walking by to take
*that if people are prevented from utilizing a holy place, it makes that place "available" for anyone walking by
*that lack of knowledge about the holiness of a place, renders that place not holy
*that once you are made aware of your trespass, you bear no responsibility for correcting it

You're probably referring to my cheeky post about demolition of the abominations on the Temple Mount. No way do they belong there. Al Aqsa was built in 705 CE. Mohammed made his Night Journey in 621 CE and died in 632 CE. He either didn't make the trip or else he was a time traveler. I don't believe one bit of that fairy tale.

Al Aqsa is so important to Muslims they don't even mention it in their Koran.

Or even face it while praying on the Temple Mount itself.

Have you noticed that every muslim holy place was originally Jewish, even the mosque in Mecca was Jewish and was Abrahams last resting place

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Let me expand on that someone cheeky post above by saying first, that I in no way support the destruction of Al-Aqsa nor the Dome of the Rock. I am against, in principle, the idea that destroying other people's holy places is....well....kosher. Let me also be clear that I am also very much against usurping other people's holy places. And the Temple Mount IS a Jewish holy place and was a Jewish holy place thousands of years before a succession of invaders came.

But Freeman's post makes "morally right" a number of clear wrongs.

*that reducing a holy place to rubble makes the place "available" for anyone walking by to take
*that if people are prevented from utilizing a holy place, it makes that place "available" for anyone walking by
*that lack of knowledge about the holiness of a place, renders that place not holy
*that once you are made aware of your trespass, you bear no responsibility for correcting it

You're probably referring to my cheeky post about demolition of the abominations on the Temple Mount. No way do they belong there. Al Aqsa was built in 705 CE. Mohammed made his Night Journey in 621 CE and died in 632 CE. He either didn't make the trip or else he was a time traveler. I don't believe one bit of that fairy tale.

Al Aqsa is so important to Muslims they don't even mention it in their Koran.

Or even face it while praying on the Temple Mount itself.

Have you noticed that every muslim holy place was originally Jewish, even the mosque in Mecca was Jewish and was Abrahams last resting place

Well, they might claim that Mecca was Abraham's final resting place, but the real resting place of Abraham is the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron. (Although I think they do recognize Abraham's Tomb in Hebron, and they just think that he visited Ishmael and Hagar in Mecca.)

 

[theliq]

Let me expand on that someone cheeky post above by saying first, that I in no way support the destruction of Al-Aqsa nor the Dome of the Rock. I am against, in principle, the idea that destroying other people's holy places is....well....kosher. Let me also be clear that I am also very much against usurping other people's holy places. And the Temple Mount IS a Jewish holy place and was a Jewish holy place thousands of years before a succession of invaders came.

But Freeman's post makes "morally right" a number of clear wrongs.

*that reducing a holy place to rubble makes the place "available" for anyone walking by to take
*that if people are prevented from utilizing a holy place, it makes that place "available" for anyone walking by
*that lack of knowledge about the holiness of a place, renders that place not holy
*that once you are made aware of your trespass, you bear no responsibility for correcting it

You're probably referring to my cheeky post about demolition of the abominations on the Temple Mount. No way do they belong there. Al Aqsa was built in 705 CE. Mohammed made his Night Journey in 621 CE and died in 632 CE. He either didn't make the trip or else he was a time traveler. I don't believe one bit of that fairy tale.

Al Aqsa is so important to Muslims they don't even mention it in their Koran.

Or even face it while praying on the Temple Mount itself.

Have you noticed that every muslim holy place was originally Jewish, even the mosque in Mecca was Jewish and was Abrahams last resting place

Well Jews were derived from Arabs in the first place Pheo

 

[Penelope]

Let me expand on that someone cheeky post above by saying first, that I in no way support the destruction of Al-Aqsa nor the Dome of the Rock. I am against, in principle, the idea that destroying other people's holy places is....well....kosher. Let me also be clear that I am also very much against usurping other people's holy places. And the Temple Mount IS a Jewish holy place and was a Jewish holy place thousands of years before a succession of invaders came.

But Freeman's post makes "morally right" a number of clear wrongs.

*that reducing a holy place to rubble makes the place "available" for anyone walking by to take
*that if people are prevented from utilizing a holy place, it makes that place "available" for anyone walking by
*that lack of knowledge about the holiness of a place, renders that place not holy
*that once you are made aware of your trespass, you bear no responsibility for correcting it

You're probably referring to my cheeky post about demolition of the abominations on the Temple Mount. No way do they belong there. Al Aqsa was built in 705 CE. Mohammed made his Night Journey in 621 CE and died in 632 CE. He either didn't make the trip or else he was a time traveler. I don't believe one bit of that fairy tale.

Al Aqsa is so important to Muslims they don't even mention it in their Koran.

Or even face it while praying on the Temple Mount itself.

Have you noticed that every muslim holy place was originally Jewish, even the mosque in Mecca was Jewish and was Abrahams last resting place

Well, they might claim that Mecca was Abraham's final resting place, but the real resting place of Abraham is the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron. (Although I think they do recognize Abraham's Tomb in Hebron, and they just think that he visited Ishmael and Hagar in Mecca.)

We'll never know will we?

 

[Phoenall]

Let me expand on that someone cheeky post above by saying first, that I in no way support the destruction of Al-Aqsa nor the Dome of the Rock. I am against, in principle, the idea that destroying other people's holy places is....well....kosher. Let me also be clear that I am also very much against usurping other people's holy places. And the Temple Mount IS a Jewish holy place and was a Jewish holy place thousands of years before a succession of invaders came.

But Freeman's post makes "morally right" a number of clear wrongs.

*that reducing a holy place to rubble makes the place "available" for anyone walking by to take
*that if people are prevented from utilizing a holy place, it makes that place "available" for anyone walking by
*that lack of knowledge about the holiness of a place, renders that place not holy
*that once you are made aware of your trespass, you bear no responsibility for correcting it

You're probably referring to my cheeky post about demolition of the abominations on the Temple Mount. No way do they belong there. Al Aqsa was built in 705 CE. Mohammed made his Night Journey in 621 CE and died in 632 CE. He either didn't make the trip or else he was a time traveler. I don't believe one bit of that fairy tale.

Al Aqsa is so important to Muslims they don't even mention it in their Koran.

Or even face it while praying on the Temple Mount itself.

Have you noticed that every muslim holy place was originally Jewish, even the mosque in Mecca was Jewish and was Abrahams last resting place

Well Jews were derived from Arabs in the first place Pheo

SAYS WHO as their DNA is not compatible. The Jews DNA is that of the people who died 2000 years before the arabs were invented.


Is this what your imam is telling you now ?

 

[Penelope]

no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon,

Show me historical evidence of anyone from 3,500 years ago. Find me evidence Mohammed existed.
Oh yeah, written historical evidence just as it is with David and Solomon.

Not an archeologist around who denies the existence of David and Solomon.

Or proves it. We have no proof of anything about David or Solomon.

 

[theliq]

Let me expand on that someone cheeky post above by saying first, that I in no way support the destruction of Al-Aqsa nor the Dome of the Rock. I am against, in principle, the idea that destroying other people's holy places is....well....kosher. Let me also be clear that I am also very much against usurping other people's holy places. And the Temple Mount IS a Jewish holy place and was a Jewish holy place thousands of years before a succession of invaders came.

But Freeman's post makes "morally right" a number of clear wrongs.

*that reducing a holy place to rubble makes the place "available" for anyone walking by to take
*that if people are prevented from utilizing a holy place, it makes that place "available" for anyone walking by
*that lack of knowledge about the holiness of a place, renders that place not holy
*that once you are made aware of your trespass, you bear no responsibility for correcting it

You're probably referring to my cheeky post about demolition of the abominations on the Temple Mount. No way do they belong there. Al Aqsa was built in 705 CE. Mohammed made his Night Journey in 621 CE and died in 632 CE. He either didn't make the trip or else he was a time traveler. I don't believe one bit of that fairy tale.

Al Aqsa is so important to Muslims they don't even mention it in their Koran.

Or even face it while praying on the Temple Mount itself.

Have you noticed that every muslim holy place was originally Jewish, even the mosque in Mecca was Jewish and was Abrahams last resting place

Well Jews were derived from Arabs in the first place Pheo

Just for Pheo www.peacewithrealism.org/jewarab2.htm steve

 

[Phoenall]

You're probably referring to my cheeky post about demolition of the abominations on the Temple Mount. No way do they belong there. Al Aqsa was built in 705 CE. Mohammed made his Night Journey in 621 CE and died in 632 CE. He either didn't make the trip or else he was a time traveler. I don't believe one bit of that fairy tale.

Al Aqsa is so important to Muslims they don't even mention it in their Koran.

Or even face it while praying on the Temple Mount itself.

Have you noticed that every muslim holy place was originally Jewish, even the mosque in Mecca was Jewish and was Abrahams last resting place

Well, they might claim that Mecca was Abraham's final resting place, but the real resting place of Abraham is the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron. (Although I think they do recognize Abraham's Tomb in Hebron, and they just think that he visited Ishmael and Hagar in Mecca.)

We'll never know will we?

We will if we are ever allowed to do tests on the remains, but seeing as that would prove the muslims claims wrong they will never allow this to happen.

 

[Phoenall]

no they can't find any historical evidence of David or Solomon,

Show me historical evidence of anyone from 3,500 years ago. Find me evidence Mohammed existed.
Oh yeah, written historical evidence just as it is with David and Solomon.

Not an archeologist around who denies the existence of David and Solomon.

Or proves it. We have no proof of anything about David or Solomon.

Even though the evidence has been provided you still deny a fundemental part of the Christian religion. And you call yourself a Christian ? ? ? ? ? ? ?